Oh good, more pointless quantum hype.

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

Oh good, more pointless quantum hype.

Once again, totally fine to get to PQ if you can. It ain't happening in 2029; the qubit math doesn't add up.

Google bumps up Q Day deadline to 2029, far sooner than previously thought

Company warns entire industry to move off RSA and EC more quickly.

Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)

[mttaggart@infosec.exchange]

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@mttaggart/116163107290977793

Previously:

[buherator@infosec.place]

@mttaggart Plus the store-now-decrypt-later threat model is not really affected by the time of the first practical quantum attack (you just store more data). I think the original announcement is more about the good rate of pqc adoption rather than q-computing breakthroughs...

[scottley@infosec.exchange]

@mttaggart always question work created by those that would benefit from the requested change.

Always trust an expert in a field.

This is the quantum superposition of trust... we must simultaneously adhere to and doubt the work of mega corps with incredible research capabilities