Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
@ChrisMayLA6 The #US may not be under the jurisdiction of the #ICC, but we did sign the #GenevaConvention.
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
They are following illegal orders.
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
@ChrisMayLA6 and there is no reason any future president could not hand over a Trump pardoned criminal to the Hague. They will only have been pardoned within America.
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
I hope so.
-
@jwi @ChrisMayLA6 no one of any consequence is going to experience any repercussions, but some token scapegoats will maybe get spanks.
We, the people, need to remember every single Nazi and hunt them down until we find them all. No rest. No quarter.
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
@ChrisMayLA6 Of course they will.
-
@ChrisMayLA6 The #US may not be under the jurisdiction of the #ICC, but we did sign the #GenevaConvention.
@farbel @ChrisMayLA6 The US acknowledged it. They are not signatories to the Geneva Convention, so they are not bound by it.
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
@ChrisMayLA6
I would very much hope that any country that has signed up to & believes in the universal jurisdiction of the ICC would see its conditions through to the letter.
...Or they risk seeing it disintegrate. -
@farbel @ChrisMayLA6 The US acknowledged it. They are not signatories to the Geneva Convention, so they are not bound by it.
@drwho @farbel @ChrisMayLA6
And who "polices" the Geneva Convention anyway?
You know, stuff like *genocide* - what has happened to the perpetrators so far?
-
@farbel @ChrisMayLA6 The US acknowledged it. They are not signatories to the Geneva Convention, so they are not bound by it.
@drwho @ChrisMayLA6 The US signed the Geneva Convention. Only the Netherlands and the US ratified it.
-
@drwho @farbel @ChrisMayLA6
And who "polices" the Geneva Convention anyway?
You know, stuff like *genocide* - what has happened to the perpetrators so far?@Quantillion @drwho @ChrisMayLA6 Good question. It is an international treaty. If you break it you also relinquish protection under it. If you are arrested in a participating nation, you can be sent to the Hague. Most countries including the US have laws based on it against war crimes.
-
@drwho @farbel @ChrisMayLA6
And who "polices" the Geneva Convention anyway?
You know, stuff like *genocide* - what has happened to the perpetrators so far?@Quantillion @farbel @ChrisMayLA6 Sweet fuck all has happened.
-
@Quantillion @farbel @ChrisMayLA6 Sweet fuck all has happened.
-
@ChrisMayLA6
ICC or ICJ?ICC
-
Will the US AirForce fulfil the Tangerine Tyrant's threat to 'decimate' Iran's civilian infrastructure?.... widely regarded as being a potential war crime.
The US is explicitly not under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, but the US has so annoyed some allies that any USAF personal involved might need to be careful where they holiday, as any country claiming 'universal jurisdiction' for war crimes might see them as legitimate subjects for arrest?
@ChrisMayLA6 Also puts Starmer / Scottish govt in a difficult position if TT decides to visit one of his Scottish golf courses.
Do we attempt to arrest "the leader of the free world"??
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
