Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. skarnet.org will be down until further notice - it may take up to 10 days (!)

skarnet.org will be down until further notice - it may take up to 10 days (!)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
37 Posts 10 Posters 37 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
    ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
    ska@social.treehouse.systems
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    skarnet.org will be down until further notice - it may take up to 10 days (!)

    I wanted to reboot the server on a newly tailored kernel to avoid CopyFail shenanigans. The shutdown failed right before rebooting (because of a small oversight in s6-linux-init that is easy to fix and will not impact anyone else). Normally that wouldn't be a problem: log in to the web interface to the VPS administration, press the reboot button, done.

    Except, Gandi added 2FA since I last logged in, and did not notify their users. And they decided that by default, the verification code would be sent to the registered primary e-mail address.

    My registered primary e-mail address is hosted on skarnet.org. Because it was never a possibility that it would be needed for the bootstrap chain. Except that now it is, and I can't access it.

    This is the dumbest catch-22 in the history of catch-22s. And the recovery procedure, when you have to prove your identity when writing to the support outside of a logged in account, can take up to 10 days. And tomorrow is a holiday. Fuck me, I guess.

    I should have paid more attention, but the consequences of my not paying enough attention should definitely not be so vast, and I have choice words for several of the decisions that were made.

    navi@social.vlhl.devN ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

      skarnet.org will be down until further notice - it may take up to 10 days (!)

      I wanted to reboot the server on a newly tailored kernel to avoid CopyFail shenanigans. The shutdown failed right before rebooting (because of a small oversight in s6-linux-init that is easy to fix and will not impact anyone else). Normally that wouldn't be a problem: log in to the web interface to the VPS administration, press the reboot button, done.

      Except, Gandi added 2FA since I last logged in, and did not notify their users. And they decided that by default, the verification code would be sent to the registered primary e-mail address.

      My registered primary e-mail address is hosted on skarnet.org. Because it was never a possibility that it would be needed for the bootstrap chain. Except that now it is, and I can't access it.

      This is the dumbest catch-22 in the history of catch-22s. And the recovery procedure, when you have to prove your identity when writing to the support outside of a logged in account, can take up to 10 days. And tomorrow is a holiday. Fuck me, I guess.

      I should have paid more attention, but the consequences of my not paying enough attention should definitely not be so vast, and I have choice words for several of the decisions that were made.

      navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
      navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
      navi@social.vlhl.dev
      wrote last edited by
      #2
      @ska my first thought for stuff like this would be to quickly setup one of those mail services that allow custom domains for free

      make the MX entries, get the recovery code, and remove the entries

      that is assuming dns access isn't also tied to the email address
      ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
        @ska my first thought for stuff like this would be to quickly setup one of those mail services that allow custom domains for free

        make the MX entries, get the recovery code, and remove the entries

        that is assuming dns access isn't also tied to the email address
        ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
        ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
        ska@social.treehouse.systems
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @navi well, alyss is also the DNS server for skarnet.org, so. πŸ˜‘

        navi@social.vlhl.devN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

          @navi well, alyss is also the DNS server for skarnet.org, so. πŸ˜‘

          navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
          navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
          navi@social.vlhl.dev
          wrote last edited by
          #4
          @ska can't that be temporarily changed w/ the registrar?

          i'm completely unaware of how hosting a dns server works
          ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
            @ska can't that be temporarily changed w/ the registrar?

            i'm completely unaware of how hosting a dns server works
            ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
            ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
            ska@social.treehouse.systems
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @navi Gandi is the registrar, I'd need to access my account to change that πŸ™„

            ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

              @navi Gandi is the registrar, I'd need to access my account to change that πŸ™„

              ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
              ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
              ska@social.treehouse.systems
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @navi Really, the system is perfectly elegant and self-contained, and has one outside line to bootstrap from: my access to the web interface to control the VPS.

              And they decided to move that access into the closed loop, without notifying me.

              navi@social.vlhl.devN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                @navi Really, the system is perfectly elegant and self-contained, and has one outside line to bootstrap from: my access to the web interface to control the VPS.

                And they decided to move that access into the closed loop, without notifying me.

                navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                navi@social.vlhl.dev
                wrote last edited by
                #7
                @ska i would honestly be a bit worried about putting all my eggs in a single basket like that tbh
                ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
                  @ska i would honestly be a bit worried about putting all my eggs in a single basket like that tbh
                  ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                  ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                  ska@social.treehouse.systems
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @navi What's the alternative? Paying for a second VPS hosted elsewhere? Having to manage another e-mail address?

                  One of the points of skarnet.org is maximum independence. And really, it has worked pretty well so far: I could always recover from mistakes.

                  Now my new recovery address will be my gmail one. Lovely. I could change and ask for some hosted address somewhere else, but that defeats the purpose of being self-reliant.

                  Really, it all comes down to "don't cut my lifeline without telling me you fucking clowns".

                  domi@donotsta.reD navi@social.vlhl.devN anachronistjohn@zia.ioA 3 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                    @navi What's the alternative? Paying for a second VPS hosted elsewhere? Having to manage another e-mail address?

                    One of the points of skarnet.org is maximum independence. And really, it has worked pretty well so far: I could always recover from mistakes.

                    Now my new recovery address will be my gmail one. Lovely. I could change and ask for some hosted address somewhere else, but that defeats the purpose of being self-reliant.

                    Really, it all comes down to "don't cut my lifeline without telling me you fucking clowns".

                    domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                    domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                    domi@donotsta.re
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @ska@treehouse.systems @navi@social.vlhl.dev you could have added a second, lower-priority MX record, which points to some server that doesn't even have to be on all the time, but worst-case scenario you can fetch your mail through it

                    of course, not a solution for right now...

                    ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • domi@donotsta.reD domi@donotsta.re

                      @ska@treehouse.systems @navi@social.vlhl.dev you could have added a second, lower-priority MX record, which points to some server that doesn't even have to be on all the time, but worst-case scenario you can fetch your mail through it

                      of course, not a solution for right now...

                      ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                      ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                      ska@social.treehouse.systems
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @domi @navi it's not like I expected my e-mail to ever be used as a necessary stepping stone to recover access to my e-mail

                      domi@donotsta.reD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                        @domi @navi it's not like I expected my e-mail to ever be used as a necessary stepping stone to recover access to my e-mail

                        domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                        domi@donotsta.reD This user is from outside of this forum
                        domi@donotsta.re
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @ska@treehouse.systems @navi@social.vlhl.dev well, now you know! ^^

                        i think i had those thoughts when I changed my ovh mail address to the domain bought on OVH. my solution is having all my resources shared to another OVH account... and paying for the domain 5 years in advance XD

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                          @navi What's the alternative? Paying for a second VPS hosted elsewhere? Having to manage another e-mail address?

                          One of the points of skarnet.org is maximum independence. And really, it has worked pretty well so far: I could always recover from mistakes.

                          Now my new recovery address will be my gmail one. Lovely. I could change and ask for some hosted address somewhere else, but that defeats the purpose of being self-reliant.

                          Really, it all comes down to "don't cut my lifeline without telling me you fucking clowns".

                          navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                          navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                          navi@social.vlhl.dev
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12
                          @ska honestly having the registrar somewhere else, and a backup mail account

                          my registrar is separate from my vps provider, and doesn't have my self hosted email as primary, solely because i was afraid of messing up smth and being locked out of their dns panel with a broken mail setup
                          ska@social.treehouse.systemsS lanodan@queer.hacktivis.meL 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
                            @ska honestly having the registrar somewhere else, and a backup mail account

                            my registrar is separate from my vps provider, and doesn't have my self hosted email as primary, solely because i was afraid of messing up smth and being locked out of their dns panel with a broken mail setup
                            ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                            ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                            ska@social.treehouse.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @navi Spreading your dependencies is clearly a more resilient setup and you're right to do so.

                            But the thing is, this incident also confirms me in my belief that it's a good thing for me to have control on as many things as possible, because as soon as I depend on one external entity, they fuck something up. So I want to be self-reliant even more.

                            And I guess my external line will now be gmail, for the sole reason that they're too big to fail. Which I don't like, but I'm going to use that property.

                            navi@social.vlhl.devN skyfaller@jawns.clubS H mirabilos@toot.mirbsd.orgM 4 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
                              @ska honestly having the registrar somewhere else, and a backup mail account

                              my registrar is separate from my vps provider, and doesn't have my self hosted email as primary, solely because i was afraid of messing up smth and being locked out of their dns panel with a broken mail setup
                              lanodan@queer.hacktivis.meL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lanodan@queer.hacktivis.meL This user is from outside of this forum
                              lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14
                              @navi @ska Also reminds me of why I don't put all my domains at the same registrar, way too many stories of accounts being locked/closed/…

                              But well I started with hosting almost everything at home, and then had to get a VPS for sending out emails and when I did that also put a secondary MX at home (and made DNS redundant around the same time).
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                                @navi Spreading your dependencies is clearly a more resilient setup and you're right to do so.

                                But the thing is, this incident also confirms me in my belief that it's a good thing for me to have control on as many things as possible, because as soon as I depend on one external entity, they fuck something up. So I want to be self-reliant even more.

                                And I guess my external line will now be gmail, for the sole reason that they're too big to fail. Which I don't like, but I'm going to use that property.

                                navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                                navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                                navi@social.vlhl.dev
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15
                                @ska oh yes, i want control of every bit i can get

                                what i can't get i try to distribute and setup redundancies
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ska@social.treehouse.systemsS ska@social.treehouse.systems

                                  @navi Spreading your dependencies is clearly a more resilient setup and you're right to do so.

                                  But the thing is, this incident also confirms me in my belief that it's a good thing for me to have control on as many things as possible, because as soon as I depend on one external entity, they fuck something up. So I want to be self-reliant even more.

                                  And I guess my external line will now be gmail, for the sole reason that they're too big to fail. Which I don't like, but I'm going to use that property.

                                  skyfaller@jawns.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  skyfaller@jawns.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  skyfaller@jawns.club
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @ska @navi Considering Gmail "too big to fail" is very... optimistic.

                                  Google can and will destroy anything in their control, up to and including Google Search. Look at the Google Graveyard! Is Google really a company you should trust with anything? https://killedbygoogle.com/

                                  I also use Gmail and I'm typing this from Android, but I live in fear of these becoming untenable overnight. I would spend a lot of time, money and effort to achieve stability elsewhere. Google may continue, but will Gmail?

                                  navi@social.vlhl.devN ska@social.treehouse.systemsS 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • skyfaller@jawns.clubS skyfaller@jawns.club

                                    @ska @navi Considering Gmail "too big to fail" is very... optimistic.

                                    Google can and will destroy anything in their control, up to and including Google Search. Look at the Google Graveyard! Is Google really a company you should trust with anything? https://killedbygoogle.com/

                                    I also use Gmail and I'm typing this from Android, but I live in fear of these becoming untenable overnight. I would spend a lot of time, money and effort to achieve stability elsewhere. Google may continue, but will Gmail?

                                    navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    navi@social.vlhl.devN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    navi@social.vlhl.dev
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17
                                    @skyfaller @ska considering how much data they get by hosting gmail, yeah -- while both google is alive and email is used by people, gmail will last

                                    it'll get shittier tho, but that doesn't matter much
                                    ada@zoner.workA skyfaller@jawns.clubS 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • navi@social.vlhl.devN navi@social.vlhl.dev
                                      @skyfaller @ska considering how much data they get by hosting gmail, yeah -- while both google is alive and email is used by people, gmail will last

                                      it'll get shittier tho, but that doesn't matter much
                                      ada@zoner.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ada@zoner.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ada@zoner.work
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @navi@social.vlhl.dev @ska@social.treehouse.systems @skyfaller@jawns.club people don't actually use gmail so it getting worse won't do much as long as it still sends and receives emails

                                      if the ui becomes utter garbage people will use external clients like when they did the initial redesign like 15 years ago

                                      ada@zoner.workA 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • skyfaller@jawns.clubS skyfaller@jawns.club

                                        @ska @navi Considering Gmail "too big to fail" is very... optimistic.

                                        Google can and will destroy anything in their control, up to and including Google Search. Look at the Google Graveyard! Is Google really a company you should trust with anything? https://killedbygoogle.com/

                                        I also use Gmail and I'm typing this from Android, but I live in fear of these becoming untenable overnight. I would spend a lot of time, money and effort to achieve stability elsewhere. Google may continue, but will Gmail?

                                        ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ska@social.treehouse.systemsS This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ska@social.treehouse.systems
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @skyfaller @navi For all intents and purposes of this conversation, "too big too fail" means that gmail will be adequate to receive recovery e-mails, and that if Google kills it, it won't be overnight, and I'll have ample warnings and time to modify my setup.

                                        The lifetime and management of Google projects is something I'm well aware of, but isn't exactly relevant to my current predicament.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ada@zoner.workA ada@zoner.work

                                          @navi@social.vlhl.dev @ska@social.treehouse.systems @skyfaller@jawns.club people don't actually use gmail so it getting worse won't do much as long as it still sends and receives emails

                                          if the ui becomes utter garbage people will use external clients like when they did the initial redesign like 15 years ago

                                          ada@zoner.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ada@zoner.workA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ada@zoner.work
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          @navi@social.vlhl.dev @ska@social.treehouse.systems @skyfaller@jawns.club people are still using outlook/hotmail after all

                                          ada@zoner.workA 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups