Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. an interesting thread on Bluesky about why people are choosing to build on #ATProto instead of #ActivityPubhttps://witchsky.app/profile/did:plc:rtf3bjc3w2yn4syxtm4r7jt2/post/3mfrp6tovy22g

an interesting thread on Bluesky about why people are choosing to build on #ATProto instead of #ActivityPubhttps://witchsky.app/profile/did:plc:rtf3bjc3w2yn4syxtm4r7jt2/post/3mfrp6tovy22g

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
atprotoactivitypub
42 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • oblomov@sociale.networkO oblomov@sociale.network

    @liaizon ironic that the page won't load, I guess, but I'm sure they answer they give isn't «because people never learn»

    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
    liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
    liaizon@social.wake.st
    wrote last edited by
    #5

    @oblomov what page wont load?

    oblomov@sociale.networkO makdaam@chaos.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

      an interesting thread on Bluesky about why people are choosing to build on #ATProto instead of #ActivityPub
      https://witchsky.app/profile/did:plc:rtf3bjc3w2yn4syxtm4r7jt2/post/3mfrp6tovy22g

      laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      laurenshof@indieweb.social
      wrote last edited by
      #6

      @liaizon the quote post of the original question also give some good insight

      Witchsky

      favicon

      (witchsky.app)

      like yeah part of it are the cultural issues, but there are some pretty clear dev-ux points as well why people build on atproto

      json-ld, and more specifically, the implicit ideal of data being open ended vs lexicon's being structured is a major part to it imo

      laurenshof@indieweb.socialL stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS julian@activitypub.spaceJ 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • oblomov@sociale.networkO oblomov@sociale.network

        @liaizon ironic that the page won't load, I guess, but I'm sure they answer they give isn't «because people never learn»

        julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julian@activitypub.space
        wrote last edited by
        #7

        @oblomov@sociale.network in a nutshell:

        1. 2x Here because Rudy from Blacksky is here
        2. Rudy (quoted) says ATProto is the distillation of everything good that blockchain/web3 offers without the crypto scams
        3. One talks about hazing of devs trying to do good stuff on fedi
        4. Another shares secondhand stories of devs wanting to do AP dev but are turned off by the above
        5. 2x Fediverse too quiet, couldn't build audience immediately (ironic!!)
        6. Unique identity
        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        1
        • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL laurenshof@indieweb.social

          @liaizon the quote post of the original question also give some good insight

          Witchsky

          favicon

          (witchsky.app)

          like yeah part of it are the cultural issues, but there are some pretty clear dev-ux points as well why people build on atproto

          json-ld, and more specifically, the implicit ideal of data being open ended vs lexicon's being structured is a major part to it imo

          laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          laurenshof@indieweb.social
          wrote last edited by
          #8

          @liaizon im waiting for the truly cursed day when someone decides to stuff a lexicon into activitypubs @context field

          liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

            @oblomov what page wont load?

            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
            oblomov@sociale.network
            wrote last edited by
            #9

            @liaizon that link in your post?

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
              oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
              oblomov@sociale.network
              wrote last edited by
              #10

              @julian thanks for the summary

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              0
              • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL laurenshof@indieweb.social

                @liaizon im waiting for the truly cursed day when someone decides to stuff a lexicon into activitypubs @context field

                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                liaizon@social.wake.st
                wrote last edited by
                #11

                @laurenshof watching the lexicon thing unfold and it really just seems like this is how it should work here. It makes the whole division of concerns clearer for everyone

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL laurenshof@indieweb.social

                  @liaizon the quote post of the original question also give some good insight

                  Witchsky

                  favicon

                  (witchsky.app)

                  like yeah part of it are the cultural issues, but there are some pretty clear dev-ux points as well why people build on atproto

                  json-ld, and more specifically, the implicit ideal of data being open ended vs lexicon's being structured is a major part to it imo

                  stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                  stefan@stefanbohacek.online
                  wrote last edited by
                  #12

                  @laurenshof @liaizon Off-topic, but how do I open this link on bsky.app?

                  Tried the old "put the URL in the search box" Mastodon trick, no luck.

                  laurenshof@indieweb.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL laurenshof@indieweb.social

                    @liaizon the quote post of the original question also give some good insight

                    Witchsky

                    favicon

                    (witchsky.app)

                    like yeah part of it are the cultural issues, but there are some pretty clear dev-ux points as well why people build on atproto

                    json-ld, and more specifically, the implicit ideal of data being open ended vs lexicon's being structured is a major part to it imo

                    julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    julian@activitypub.space
                    wrote last edited by
                    #13

                    > @laurenshof@indieweb.social said in an interesting thread on Bluesky about why people are choosing to build on #ATProto instead of #ActivityPubhttps://witchsky.app/profile/did:plc:rtf3bjc3w2yn4syxtm4r7jt2/post/3mfrp6tovy22g:
                    >
                    > json-ld, and more specifically, the implicit ideal of data being open ended vs lexicon's being structured is a major part to it imo

                    Wait what does this mean?

                    1. JSON-LD is technically optional (I only put a token effort into it and only because people complained to me about it)
                    2. Open-ended protocols have a history of being successful precisely due to its open-ended nature (see: HTML)
                    3. Isn't JSON-LD an attempt to bring structure to AP just like Lexicons do to ATProto?

                    So which one's actually more open-ended? <img class="not-responsive emoji" src="https://activitypub.space/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=3463a4088f6" title="😆" />

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                      @oblomov what page wont load?

                      makdaam@chaos.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      makdaam@chaos.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      makdaam@chaos.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #14

                      @liaizon The posts via witchsky.app don't load reliably. Going through the main bluesky webUI works better.

                      @oblomov There are some "the crypto is built in by design" answers. Some are about how confusing and potentially unstable individual servers are. Most are "I like my services centralized" (ie. central indexing, search and the usual corpo social media stuff). One complaint about racism on fedi.
                      I'm happy they found a place to build all that away from fedi, far away from fedi.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                        liaizon@social.wake.st
                        wrote last edited by
                        #15

                        @julian you don't want to platform people who are unwelcoming to devs? I think the issue is that a lot of the devs who show up are also totally oblivious to how their stuff effects the network and people who use it and the implications of their code on peoples lives. So I don't think it's as easy as just us being more welcoming to builders either sadly

                        julian@activitypub.spaceJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                          @laurenshof @liaizon Off-topic, but how do I open this link on bsky.app?

                          Tried the old "put the URL in the search box" Mastodon trick, no luck.

                          laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          laurenshof@indieweb.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #16

                          @stefan @liaizon easiest way is to just replace witchsky with bsky in the url, the data structure is all exactly the same so this trick tends to work mostly

                          stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL laurenshof@indieweb.social

                            @stefan @liaizon easiest way is to just replace witchsky with bsky in the url, the data structure is all exactly the same so this trick tends to work mostly

                            stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                            stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
                            stefan@stefanbohacek.online
                            wrote last edited by
                            #17

                            @laurenshof Right, but I'm looking for a user-friendly way to do this. You know, for normies.

                            @liaizon

                            liaizon@social.wake.stL laurenshof@indieweb.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                              laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                              laurenshof@indieweb.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #18

                              @julian

                              it really matters which part of the system exactly is open ended. atproto's lexicon system is open ended in the sense that everyone can publish any lexicon they want, but each individual lexicon is constraint (by design)

                              json-ld also technically has this open-ended nature (you can put whatever you want in @context), but then also tries to make it so that this can result in every mesage being parsable by everything else

                              laurenshof@indieweb.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • laurenshof@indieweb.socialL laurenshof@indieweb.social

                                @julian

                                it really matters which part of the system exactly is open ended. atproto's lexicon system is open ended in the sense that everyone can publish any lexicon they want, but each individual lexicon is constraint (by design)

                                json-ld also technically has this open-ended nature (you can put whatever you want in @context), but then also tries to make it so that this can result in every mesage being parsable by everything else

                                laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                laurenshof@indieweb.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #19

                                @julian like there is this implicit assumption that every server should be able to read every message type, or at least be able to parse it to determine whether they want to or not

                                this separations of concerns is much clearer with lexicons: part of your app design is making an explicit choice of 'my app reads these lexicons and disregards the rest'. that distinction is much less clear in activitypub, because you it is so open-ended

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                                  @laurenshof Right, but I'm looking for a user-friendly way to do this. You know, for normies.

                                  @liaizon

                                  liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  liaizon@social.wake.st
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #20

                                  @stefan @laurenshof many apps over there have an "open in Bluesky" button on the 3rd party interfaces, this one is just a fork of the main bluesky codebase by someone who added pronoun viewer support which is why I started using it

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS stefan@stefanbohacek.online

                                    @laurenshof Right, but I'm looking for a user-friendly way to do this. You know, for normies.

                                    @liaizon

                                    laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    laurenshof@indieweb.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    laurenshof@indieweb.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @stefan @liaizon there isnt any. its bascially the same question of why phanpy doesnt have a button to view a post in ivory.

                                    difference is that phanpy does have a button to view the post on the home instance. but there is no home instance on atproto in that same sense. like it would mean opening the raw record on your pds

                                    stefan@stefanbohacek.onlineS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • n00q@don.n00q.netN n00q@don.n00q.net

                                      @liaizon

                                      I'm surprised that most of these I don't consider good/very compelling reasons!

                                      foolishowl@social.coopF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      foolishowl@social.coopF This user is from outside of this forum
                                      foolishowl@social.coop
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @n00q @liaizon There's a lot of people who just can't get their heads around the idea that we don't want a centralized system that's easily parsed and commodified.

                                      liaizon@social.wake.stL 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • liaizon@social.wake.stL liaizon@social.wake.st

                                        @julian you don't want to platform people who are unwelcoming to devs? I think the issue is that a lot of the devs who show up are also totally oblivious to how their stuff effects the network and people who use it and the implications of their code on peoples lives. So I don't think it's as easy as just us being more welcoming to builders either sadly

                                        julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        julian@activitypub.spaceJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        julian@activitypub.space
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @liaizon@social.wake.st I don't want to platform one-sided discussion against the development of new functonality built on top of ActivityPub.

                                        Critique is fine. It's even accepted. I'm not saying that nobody should ever disagree on implementation, design, etc.

                                        The problem here is that the disagreements are not done on a level playing field. You have one side that has judged another without fully understanding the situation (or not having put any thought in besides "I like this person, they don't like you, and therefore you are bad"), having absolutely demonized this person from the very beginning, and you expect that person to start that uphill battle?

                                        It's absolutely no surprise that they choose to leave instead.

                                        It's an absolute fucking miracle that @quillmatiq@mastodon.social and @snarfed.org@fed.brid.gy are still here.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        • foolishowl@social.coopF foolishowl@social.coop

                                          @n00q @liaizon There's a lot of people who just can't get their heads around the idea that we don't want a centralized system that's easily parsed and commodified.

                                          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          liaizon@social.wake.stL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          liaizon@social.wake.st
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #24

                                          @foolishowl that's an incredibly unhelpful read on people there tbh

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups