Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Subject: Information processing in autism.

Subject: Information processing in autism.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
audhdneurodivergentepistemicinjustactuallyautistiautism
78 Posts 16 Posters 103 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

    @astridpoot

    It does show it. I love this picture.

    astridpoot@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    astridpoot@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
    astridpoot@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @KatyElphinstone the sense of connection between everything

    katyelphinstone@mas.toK 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • astridpoot@mastodon.socialA astridpoot@mastodon.social

      @KatyElphinstone the sense of connection between everything

      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
      katyelphinstone@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @astridpoot

      It's really beautiful. I'm just looking at your site and waiting for the English translation to load (as I cannot claim to understand much Dutch).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • astridpoot@mastodon.socialA astridpoot@mastodon.social

        @KatyElphinstone the sense of connection between everything

        katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
        katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
        katyelphinstone@mas.to
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @astridpoot

        I love your series of boring paintings. I went straight in there.

        katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C cordova5029@dragonscave.space

          @KatyElphinstone I had a huge fasenation with doors, and doorbells, and oh god, every time we were anywhere with a doorbell or a unique doorknob I had to check it out again. OH, we're at my aunt's house, hey I gotta ring the doorbell at least 4 different times. Me at age 5 31 years ago lol.

          markc568@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          markc568@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
          markc568@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @cordova5029 @KatyElphinstone I had a fascination with doorknobs when I was young.

          I determined at an early age that the simple ones, like in a house, have a plain shaft that connects both sides. Turning one side turns the other side.

          But commercial knobs typically have a separate mechanism for each side. Turning one side does not turn the other. Which I found fascinating, so of course I had to try this out whenever we went somewhere new.

          But there was a house around the corner from ours that had some type of multi- chime doorbell that played a song. Which was fascinating and unheard of in the 70s.

          katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

            @astridpoot

            I love your series of boring paintings. I went straight in there.

            katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
            katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
            katyelphinstone@mas.to
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @astridpoot

            The beauty in the banal 🥰

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • markc568@beige.partyM markc568@beige.party

              @cordova5029 @KatyElphinstone I had a fascination with doorknobs when I was young.

              I determined at an early age that the simple ones, like in a house, have a plain shaft that connects both sides. Turning one side turns the other side.

              But commercial knobs typically have a separate mechanism for each side. Turning one side does not turn the other. Which I found fascinating, so of course I had to try this out whenever we went somewhere new.

              But there was a house around the corner from ours that had some type of multi- chime doorbell that played a song. Which was fascinating and unheard of in the 70s.

              katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
              katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
              katyelphinstone@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @markc568 @cordova5029

              I once had to figure one out because it was broken. It was surprisingly complex! It would have been very useful to have you there!

              panda@assemblag.esP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                All of this means it can be a) more tiring, and b) more time-consuming for us to move through the world, taking it in.

                This can make everyday environments more effortful (more processing load, more filtering required), which can feel more tiring and sometimes slower.

                This could also account for why autistic people need a lot of low-stimulus downtime, to recover from it all. Anyone would!

                End of thread 🧵

                Refs below.

                x0@dragonscave.spaceX This user is from outside of this forum
                x0@dragonscave.spaceX This user is from outside of this forum
                x0@dragonscave.space
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @KatyElphinstone This likely has a direct connection to the phrase "just tune it out" that we get all the time, especially with hearing and auditory processing. For whatever reason, I guess the NT brain just has better active filtering on the senses than the autistic brain? I'm blind, but from what I understand that degree of filtering is virtually required for vision to function, as the eyes generate a ton of spurious information such as motion blur on their own, not to mention the sheer amount of detail they can capture, and so the brain subjects it to heavy filtering to try and build a coherent mental perception. With ears, all the info is coming into the auditory cortex which also has to build a coherent mental perception (sound) out of it. And I guess that either the auditory cortex or whatever its output goes to just can have different degrees of filtering? These can be slightly manipulated by people, actually. It's a myth that blind people literally *hear* better than people who are not blind, but the case could theoretically be made that they *listen* better? Their brain, consciously or subconsciously, assigned more processing to their ears than a person who has to spend all that bandwidth on visual input instead. Although I haven't looked at correlations between blindness and auditory processing disorders and likelihood of overstimulation, I wonder if anyone's done research on that!
                Edit: Not sure about auditory processing disorders and overstimulation specifically, but there is certainly evidence to suggest that the auditory cortex adapts itself to be more capable of perceiving detail. The example they use here in sound frequency and motion, and the frequency part might have something to do with that anecdotal correlation between blindness and enhanced pitch perception and musicality. https://www.washington.edu/news/2019/04/22/brains-of-blind-people-adapt-to-sharpen-sense-of-hearing-study-shows/

                katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                  Subject: Information processing in autism. Is our style necessarily a deficit?

                  Why do autistic people find new or high-stimulus environments stressful; even overwhelming?

                  Why can it seem, at times, we're slower than others? To take in scenes; to mentally process them; to make decisions based on them 🤷

                  This thread is an alternative take on autistic processing style & speed.

                  👇

                  (Comments & feedback welcomed, as always!)

                  #Autism #ActuallyAutistic #EpistemicInjustice #Neurodivergent #AuDHD

                  joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  joshsusser@autistics.life
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @KatyElphinstone Interesting angle on it. I have an analogy with computers that has worked pretty well before: Database optimization for read vs write. When you store information in a database, there are two basic ways to find it later: you can scan every record until you find the ones with that info, or you can use an index to look up the records that match the search term. Which is like looking up a word in a book's index to get a list of all the pages where that word is used – it's much faster to check only those pages than every page of the book. So it's faster to find the data, but the catch is that it takes a little work to keep the index updated as you add records. If you look stuff up more often than you add records, that trade-off works out and you spend less time overall.

                  I think of autistic processing as something like that. My autistic brain spends more time up front processing new information and building connections to other information, so it's faster for me to recall information or find interesting associations to other info. Just like keeping a database index up to date makes adding info a little slower so finding it later is a lot faster. It's all about trade-offs. Nobody can be the best at everything, especially when being the best means optimizing for that situation at the expense of others. I just want people to stop expecting me to have a write-optimized brain instead of a read-optimized one.

                  katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • x0@dragonscave.spaceX x0@dragonscave.space

                    @KatyElphinstone This likely has a direct connection to the phrase "just tune it out" that we get all the time, especially with hearing and auditory processing. For whatever reason, I guess the NT brain just has better active filtering on the senses than the autistic brain? I'm blind, but from what I understand that degree of filtering is virtually required for vision to function, as the eyes generate a ton of spurious information such as motion blur on their own, not to mention the sheer amount of detail they can capture, and so the brain subjects it to heavy filtering to try and build a coherent mental perception. With ears, all the info is coming into the auditory cortex which also has to build a coherent mental perception (sound) out of it. And I guess that either the auditory cortex or whatever its output goes to just can have different degrees of filtering? These can be slightly manipulated by people, actually. It's a myth that blind people literally *hear* better than people who are not blind, but the case could theoretically be made that they *listen* better? Their brain, consciously or subconsciously, assigned more processing to their ears than a person who has to spend all that bandwidth on visual input instead. Although I haven't looked at correlations between blindness and auditory processing disorders and likelihood of overstimulation, I wonder if anyone's done research on that!
                    Edit: Not sure about auditory processing disorders and overstimulation specifically, but there is certainly evidence to suggest that the auditory cortex adapts itself to be more capable of perceiving detail. The example they use here in sound frequency and motion, and the frequency part might have something to do with that anecdotal correlation between blindness and enhanced pitch perception and musicality. https://www.washington.edu/news/2019/04/22/brains-of-blind-people-adapt-to-sharpen-sense-of-hearing-study-shows/

                    katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                    katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                    katyelphinstone@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @x0

                    The bandwidth idea is fascinating. I've spent time thinking about that in relation to social interactions and cues - that autistic people may develop expertise simply in areas other than human socialization. Most humans are not aware of how much bandwidth is dedicated to that topic, never having thought about it (fish: what is water?), & then think autistic people are somehow endowed with incredible/unusual ability.

                    x0@dragonscave.spaceX 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ joshsusser@autistics.life

                      @KatyElphinstone Interesting angle on it. I have an analogy with computers that has worked pretty well before: Database optimization for read vs write. When you store information in a database, there are two basic ways to find it later: you can scan every record until you find the ones with that info, or you can use an index to look up the records that match the search term. Which is like looking up a word in a book's index to get a list of all the pages where that word is used – it's much faster to check only those pages than every page of the book. So it's faster to find the data, but the catch is that it takes a little work to keep the index updated as you add records. If you look stuff up more often than you add records, that trade-off works out and you spend less time overall.

                      I think of autistic processing as something like that. My autistic brain spends more time up front processing new information and building connections to other information, so it's faster for me to recall information or find interesting associations to other info. Just like keeping a database index up to date makes adding info a little slower so finding it later is a lot faster. It's all about trade-offs. Nobody can be the best at everything, especially when being the best means optimizing for that situation at the expense of others. I just want people to stop expecting me to have a write-optimized brain instead of a read-optimized one.

                      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                      katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                      katyelphinstone@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @joshsusser

                      Aha yes, I see! And that would be where the pattern-seeking comes into it, too.

                      I seem to go very much in-depth in those subjects I'm interested in, creating webs of meaning (indexing) all over the place. My info recall is incredible in those areas.

                      Whereas I have no idea what the names of my neighbors are, or when the school committee meetings are taking place, and perhaps never will.

                      joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                        Seymour, R. A., et al. (2019). Dysregulated oscillatory connectivity in the visual system in autism spectrum disorder. Brain.
                        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6763739/

                        — Reduced feedback V4→V1; feedforward similar between groups.

                        Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025). Clinical Testing and Diagnosis for Autism Spectrum Disorder.
                        https://www.cdc.gov/autism/hcp/diagnosis/index.html

                        — DSM-5 diagnostic criteria summary; includes sensory differences.

                        ⬇️

                        katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                        katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                        katyelphinstone@mas.to
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        And the ravioli story comes from the book 'Autism: A New Introduction to Psychological Theory and Current Debate', by Sue Fletcher-Watson & Francesca Happé.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                          @joshsusser

                          Aha yes, I see! And that would be where the pattern-seeking comes into it, too.

                          I seem to go very much in-depth in those subjects I'm interested in, creating webs of meaning (indexing) all over the place. My info recall is incredible in those areas.

                          Whereas I have no idea what the names of my neighbors are, or when the school committee meetings are taking place, and perhaps never will.

                          joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          joshsusser@autistics.life
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @KatyElphinstone Yep, that's like how you don't make an index for every table in a database, just the ones where lookup time is important. This works as an analogy, but I don't imagine that brains and databases work the same way. The point of the analogy is that there can be good reasons to spend more time incorporating new information, even if it looks like you're just being slow.

                          katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • joshsusser@autistics.lifeJ joshsusser@autistics.life

                            @KatyElphinstone Yep, that's like how you don't make an index for every table in a database, just the ones where lookup time is important. This works as an analogy, but I don't imagine that brains and databases work the same way. The point of the analogy is that there can be good reasons to spend more time incorporating new information, even if it looks like you're just being slow.

                            katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                            katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                            katyelphinstone@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #34

                            @joshsusser

                            The volume of information is important. You need a critical mass in order to make meaningful connections.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                              In effect, the boy was not allowing his pre-existing beliefs to cloud his judgement about that piece of ravioli on the bed 😉

                              All told, could it be that, as autistic people, we’re simply taking in more signals from the outside world than most?

                              The research of Pellicano and Burr suggests autistic perception seems indeed to rely less heavily on expectations and preconceptions than the norm.

                              We may, in fact, be more ‘eye to brain’, so to speak.

                              👇

                              jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote last edited by
                              #35

                              @KatyElphinstone I often find those classified as allistic (or ”normal”) to come of as a bit shallow.

                              To me they seem not able to, or even interested in, geting into the details, having deeper interests, or even maintaining discourse on a topic for a reasonably long time.

                              This feeling could also stem from my own occupational injuries. As a software engineer I spend my entire days drilling into the nitty gritty.

                              Third option is they’re masking, and do a good job at it. Hard to tell.

                              katyelphinstone@mas.toK jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                @KatyElphinstone I often find those classified as allistic (or ”normal”) to come of as a bit shallow.

                                To me they seem not able to, or even interested in, geting into the details, having deeper interests, or even maintaining discourse on a topic for a reasonably long time.

                                This feeling could also stem from my own occupational injuries. As a software engineer I spend my entire days drilling into the nitty gritty.

                                Third option is they’re masking, and do a good job at it. Hard to tell.

                                katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                katyelphinstone@mas.toK This user is from outside of this forum
                                katyelphinstone@mas.to
                                wrote last edited by
                                #36

                                @jordgubben

                                I think masking can go pretty deep. To the point one doesn't even know one's doing it, I guess!

                                jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                  @KatyElphinstone I often find those classified as allistic (or ”normal”) to come of as a bit shallow.

                                  To me they seem not able to, or even interested in, geting into the details, having deeper interests, or even maintaining discourse on a topic for a reasonably long time.

                                  This feeling could also stem from my own occupational injuries. As a software engineer I spend my entire days drilling into the nitty gritty.

                                  Third option is they’re masking, and do a good job at it. Hard to tell.

                                  jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.placeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jordgubben@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @KatyElphinstone Shallow, and still worthy of care and respect, I should add. People are different; not everyone has the privilege of being born ’nerd able’.

                                  So give your fellow ”alli” (can we please start calling allistic people that?) a hug (if they concent), or at least a pat on the shoulder, for trying their hardest to fit in among the rest of us.

                                  They deserve a bit of encouragement now and then.

                                  katyelphinstone@mas.toK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                                    @x0

                                    The bandwidth idea is fascinating. I've spent time thinking about that in relation to social interactions and cues - that autistic people may develop expertise simply in areas other than human socialization. Most humans are not aware of how much bandwidth is dedicated to that topic, never having thought about it (fish: what is water?), & then think autistic people are somehow endowed with incredible/unusual ability.

                                    x0@dragonscave.spaceX This user is from outside of this forum
                                    x0@dragonscave.spaceX This user is from outside of this forum
                                    x0@dragonscave.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @KatyElphinstone I assume the existence of the concept of mental bandwidth, but I think most people would agree it's a thing, although one could get into arguments about specializations of certain areas of the brain and how that contributes to things, since it's not just like a CPU that has to execute one stream of instructions. Overstimulation follows simply from there, not having enough bandwidth left to process all the incoming info. Certain kinds of brains that need specific levels of multitasking to keep themselves on track and productive have a minimum bandwidth requirement, otherwise that unused bandwidth is given to ADHD kinds of random thoughts. Drugs, life events, and sleep among many things are known to affect it regardless of what brain you're talkingabout.

                                    x0@dragonscave.spaceX panda@assemblag.esP 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • x0@dragonscave.spaceX x0@dragonscave.space

                                      @KatyElphinstone I assume the existence of the concept of mental bandwidth, but I think most people would agree it's a thing, although one could get into arguments about specializations of certain areas of the brain and how that contributes to things, since it's not just like a CPU that has to execute one stream of instructions. Overstimulation follows simply from there, not having enough bandwidth left to process all the incoming info. Certain kinds of brains that need specific levels of multitasking to keep themselves on track and productive have a minimum bandwidth requirement, otherwise that unused bandwidth is given to ADHD kinds of random thoughts. Drugs, life events, and sleep among many things are known to affect it regardless of what brain you're talkingabout.

                                      x0@dragonscave.spaceX This user is from outside of this forum
                                      x0@dragonscave.spaceX This user is from outside of this forum
                                      x0@dragonscave.space
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @KatyElphinstone Capacity might be a more apt term for it, but I tend to think in terms of bandwidth in the meaning as the instantaneous capacity, how much space is being used in the channel right now.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • x0@dragonscave.spaceX x0@dragonscave.space

                                        @KatyElphinstone I assume the existence of the concept of mental bandwidth, but I think most people would agree it's a thing, although one could get into arguments about specializations of certain areas of the brain and how that contributes to things, since it's not just like a CPU that has to execute one stream of instructions. Overstimulation follows simply from there, not having enough bandwidth left to process all the incoming info. Certain kinds of brains that need specific levels of multitasking to keep themselves on track and productive have a minimum bandwidth requirement, otherwise that unused bandwidth is given to ADHD kinds of random thoughts. Drugs, life events, and sleep among many things are known to affect it regardless of what brain you're talkingabout.

                                        panda@assemblag.esP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        panda@assemblag.esP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        panda@assemblag.es
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @x0 @KatyElphinstone What you'e writing about bandwidth is exactly what is described by the monotropism theory.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • katyelphinstone@mas.toK katyelphinstone@mas.to

                                          @markc568 @cordova5029

                                          I once had to figure one out because it was broken. It was surprisingly complex! It would have been very useful to have you there!

                                          panda@assemblag.esP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          panda@assemblag.esP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          panda@assemblag.es
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          @KatyElphinstone @markc568 @cordova5029 I find it relates to my, and I believe that of many other Autists, fascination with what Georges Perec named the infra-ordinary. Observing what is so ordinary that many others (mostly neurotypicals?) just don't see anymore. Also looking at things from unusual angles.

                                          For instance I find that what I photograph and how is typically Autistic (which you can check at https://www.flickr.com/photos/acrostich/?)

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups