As some of you may know, we're building Flatline, a self‑hostable soft fork of the Signal Server.

[mollyim@fosstodon.org]

As some of you may know, we're building Flatline, a self‑hostable soft fork of the Signal Server. It lets you run a mostly Signal‑compatible server for research and private deployments.

We already run a Flatline server in Bahnhof cloud for internal development.

#Signal #mollyim #flatline

[mollyim@fosstodon.org]

Now we're working on accounts without phone numbers, and the technical draft is public.

If you're interested or might ever want to run your own server, have a look.

flatline-docs/drafts/phone-less-registration.md at main · mollyim/flatline-docs

Specifications and project-wide documentation for Flatline. - flatline-docs/drafts/phone-less-registration.md at main · mollyim/flatline-docs

GitHub (github.com)

Open to questions or suggestions.

#Flatline

[hipsterelectron@circumstances.run]

@mollyim this fucking rocks

[rubdos@mastodon.social]

@mollyim I'd be interested in having a Flatline-on-demand in my Gitlab pipeline integration, and as a Github-Actions-equivalent. Is that something that should be provided in the upstream Flatline repos?

[hipsterelectron@circumstances.run]

@mollyim i also have some opinions about the new cryptosystem introduced by signal's new cryptographer and will be looking to implement a separate double ratchet implementation for separate reasons. i don't expect my implementation will be useful for the molly project but was wondering if there was any discussion about double ratchet vs spqr for this independent implementation