Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI

ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
142 Posts 95 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B blarg_dunsen@sh.itjust.works

    Oh boy, do I have bad news about 90% of the internet for you...

    mudkip@lemdro.idM This user is from outside of this forum
    mudkip@lemdro.idM This user is from outside of this forum
    mudkip@lemdro.id
    wrote last edited by
    #108

    Linus sent an email recently to the Kernel Mailing List trashing AI slop and rejecting AI generated patches. The fact that he used it to play around with a script doesn't invalidate the fact that he distrusts code written by LLMs when it actually matters.

    5 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M mirrorgiraffe@piefed.social

      Classic "test in production" strategy, very solid!

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      callmemagnus@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #109

      Consider a donation to help people providing you the open source software you seem to depend upon.

      Usage of a helper tool to perform tasks on code whether it is AI or the IDE internal features can reduce the work load of benevolent developers who has not asked you to use their softwares.

      Maybe the language was not appropriate but get real. With the little revenue generated by the usage of people complaining, the use of AI agentic coding might be the only way to bring features without pushing benevolent devs to burnout.

      Edit: to bring, not to being!

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mudkip@lemdro.idM mudkip@lemdro.id

        Linus sent an email recently to the Kernel Mailing List trashing AI slop and rejecting AI generated patches. The fact that he used it to play around with a script doesn't invalidate the fact that he distrusts code written by LLMs when it actually matters.

        5 This user is from outside of this forum
        5 This user is from outside of this forum
        5gruel@lemmy.world
        wrote last edited by
        #110

        you mean this statement? https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/08/linus_versus_llms_ai_slop_docs/?td=rt-3a

        If yes, your statement does not really match what Linus said.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R railcar8095@lemmy.world

          Test in production is the best. We spent months warning from data bugs and nobody bat an eye (upstream bug, not our responsibility but we noticed)
          When it was d launched in prod we just pointed out the bug that nobody fixed was still there and immediately a war room was formed and the bug fixed within an hour.

          It honestly seems more efficient to let shit hit the fan than to fight everybody to do their job.

          H This user is from outside of this forum
          H This user is from outside of this forum
          hornedfiend@piefed.social
          wrote last edited by
          #111

          Testing in production is the most idiotic last 10 years or so concept, which is mainly driven by incompetence of project managers.

          Imagine if you get sold a car by a company, for 100k, then it starts having major issues and the car company tells you: "we'll fix it".

          While that does not necessarily apply to software or services or webapps, the logic still stands. You are selling bugs to people. Bugs that could have been cought, with some risk management and planning.

          Edit: F-ing ios keyboard.

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G greenknight23@lemmy.world

            been using EMQX plus an MQTT client on my phone for a few months now, I like it better than gotify since the app was chewing through my battery like a vampire.

            it might be better now since my issues happened three-ish years ago.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            cyber@feddit.uk
            wrote last edited by
            #112

            This EMQX?

            Seems it's no longer FOSS?

            I've been using Gotify for a few notifications from Home Assistant and it doesn't appear to be eating my battery.

            It's a little more responsive than ntfy - sometimes ntfy doesn't alert for ages after the trigger (could be phone power saving the wifi...), but then I also get realerts from yesterday.... not had that with Gotify.

            G 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C cyber@feddit.uk

              This EMQX?

              Seems it's no longer FOSS?

              I've been using Gotify for a few notifications from Home Assistant and it doesn't appear to be eating my battery.

              It's a little more responsive than ntfy - sometimes ntfy doesn't alert for ages after the trigger (could be phone power saving the wifi...), but then I also get realerts from yesterday.... not had that with Gotify.

              G This user is from outside of this forum
              G This user is from outside of this forum
              greenknight23@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #113

              that's the one.

              FOSS or not, it still runs just fine on my infra. I prefer it over something like rabbitmq because it has a pretty slick admin webgui.

              I'll have to give gotify another try.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H hornedfiend@piefed.social

                Testing in production is the most idiotic last 10 years or so concept, which is mainly driven by incompetence of project managers.

                Imagine if you get sold a car by a company, for 100k, then it starts having major issues and the car company tells you: "we'll fix it".

                While that does not necessarily apply to software or services or webapps, the logic still stands. You are selling bugs to people. Bugs that could have been cought, with some risk management and planning.

                Edit: F-ing ios keyboard.

                R This user is from outside of this forum
                R This user is from outside of this forum
                railcar8095@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by
                #114

                which is mainly driven by incompetence of project managers.

                I completely agree. I work on an internal solution, which is a part of a very large product. It's not a live product, only part of a pipeline that runs on a predetermined schedule. Our bit is the only one with actual business/performance KPIs, most of the other teams measure only "user story/CR points". If the other teams screw up, it will impact our performance unless we prove it's their fault. And of it's their fault, they open a US/bug which improves their metrics (one more US closed).
                Our team has to think ahead and try to do things well in one go, because our bugfixing doesn't count as work. But our speed is measured against people who benefits from half doing stuff.
                When we did massive effort, we got complaints we were slow. Now we do less effort and once every blue moon we have to do a hotfix.
                Most often than not when we have an production issue is due to the other teams that run before us on the pipeline, so we even had to develop checks to our input because they won't add checks to their outputs. And they won't because that's a CR that requires extra funding that's not approved, but we had to create them for our own sanity.

                Yes, I'm looking to move out haha

                H 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • exu@feditown.comE exu@feditown.com

                  Do you know any? I've never really looked beyond ntfy.sh until now

                  trustedtyrant@sopuli.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                  trustedtyrant@sopuli.xyzT This user is from outside of this forum
                  trustedtyrant@sopuli.xyz
                  wrote last edited by
                  #115

                  I recently switched to gotify. Push notifications to iOS aren’t as good but I’m happy with it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world

                    According to the release:

                    Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

                    The code was written by Cursor and Claude

                    14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

                    reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

                    This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

                    Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    S This user is from outside of this forum
                    sanpe_@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #116

                    I'm so tired of that.

                    I'm using it for scripts notifications + unifiedpush. I don't know where to start to find the fitting alternative.

                    S douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • R rozlav@lemmy.blahaj.zone

                      there is this repo that lists some slopware :
                      https://codeberg.org/small-hack/open-slopware
                      maybe someone can add it

                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      osanna@lemmy.vg
                      wrote last edited by
                      #117

                      oh no. not ladybird! You were supposed to save us!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C callmemagnus@lemmy.world

                        Consider a donation to help people providing you the open source software you seem to depend upon.

                        Usage of a helper tool to perform tasks on code whether it is AI or the IDE internal features can reduce the work load of benevolent developers who has not asked you to use their softwares.

                        Maybe the language was not appropriate but get real. With the little revenue generated by the usage of people complaining, the use of AI agentic coding might be the only way to bring features without pushing benevolent devs to burnout.

                        Edit: to bring, not to being!

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        mirrorgiraffe@piefed.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #118

                        You are completely correct, and to be honest I've tested commercial product features in prod as well on teams that have the capacity to handle it and make a living on it, unlike this maintainer.

                        I'm also experimenting heavily with vibe coding and I think it has many uses for a seasoned programmer while getting a lot of flak.

                        Of course there are issues and problems with it, but for me it had been helping out a lot.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S sanpe_@lemmy.world

                          I'm so tired of that.

                          I'm using it for scripts notifications + unifiedpush. I don't know where to start to find the fitting alternative.

                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                          shayeta@feddit.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #119

                          If more people were contributing there wouldn't be a need for AI.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • S shayeta@feddit.org

                            If more people were contributing there wouldn't be a need for AI.

                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            S This user is from outside of this forum
                            sanpe_@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #120

                            Non-sense comment. The project was fine without AI. And it's so stupid: how do you expect people to contribute if there's only AI? How do you expect developers to learn to code if everything is AI?

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world

                              According to the release:

                              Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

                              The code was written by Cursor and Claude

                              14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

                              reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

                              This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

                              Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              deathbird@mander.xyz
                              wrote last edited by
                              #121

                              "but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings."

                              This is the way.

                              douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD J 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • P patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se

                                It looks like that tool is more or less built by a single developer (you already trust their judgment anyways!), and even though the code came through in a single PR it was a merge from a branch that had 79 separate commits: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/pull/1619

                                Also glancing through it a bit, huge portions of that are straightforward refactors or even just formatting changes caused by adding a new backend option.

                                I'm not going to say it's fine, but they didn't just throw Claude at a problem and let it rewrite 25k lines of code unnecessarily.

                                fccview@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fccview@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fccview@lemmy.world
                                wrote last edited by
                                #122

                                Yeah, I mean, with or without AI, I've always only had a big pull request for releases, from a stable release branch into the main branch, the release branch would be a merge of various branches or just be worked on directly on various stages.

                                One big pull request doesn't really mean anything.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • D deathbird@mander.xyz

                                  "but reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks by me. I created comparison documents, went through all queries multiple times and reviewed the logic over and over again. I also did load tests and manual regression tests, which took lots of evenings."

                                  This is the way.

                                  douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  douglasg14b@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #123

                                  Pretty much.

                                  I've started using AI on a project last week and the first thing I do is write tests. Lots of tests.

                                  With enough guardrails, you could actually get pretty decent quality output out of it and with enough regression tests, you can ensure that nothing's actually breaking.

                                  Similarly, reviewing its changes and actually reading the code that's being generated to ensure correctness is necessary. However, I am finding ways to automate that and reduce the incident rate of problems to even lower than my co-workers.

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S sanpe_@lemmy.world

                                    I'm so tired of that.

                                    I'm using it for scripts notifications + unifiedpush. I don't know where to start to find the fitting alternative.

                                    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                    douglasg14b@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #124

                                    The maintainer you and said that they tirelessly tested, reviewed and verified changes over the course of 3 weeks to make sure that things were running and operating correctly.

                                    This is how it should be done. It's not like they're vibe coding this.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world

                                      According to the release:

                                      Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

                                      The code was written by Cursor and Claude

                                      14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

                                      reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

                                      This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

                                      Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      N This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nalivai@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #125

                                      This doesn't make me uneasy. It makes me resentful, a little angry, and a lot tired. Thanks for bringing it to attention, I will make sure that nothing of that project or from that author will ever cross my ecosystem again.

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN november@piefed.blahaj.zone

                                        How about you tell me what you see that I missed?

                                        kilgore_trout@feddit.itK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kilgore_trout@feddit.itK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kilgore_trout@feddit.it
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #126

                                        Self-host

                                        It is possible to host your own Autopush server. Autopush is designed to work with Google BigTable but it is also possible to use it with redis.

                                        For this:

                                        1. Clone Autopush

                                        # mozilla-services/autopush-rs

                                        Autopush-rs

                                        Mozilla Push server built with Rust.

                                        By using Sunup, your are going to have to trust Mozilla.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • douglasg14b@lemmy.worldD douglasg14b@lemmy.world

                                          Pretty much.

                                          I've started using AI on a project last week and the first thing I do is write tests. Lots of tests.

                                          With enough guardrails, you could actually get pretty decent quality output out of it and with enough regression tests, you can ensure that nothing's actually breaking.

                                          Similarly, reviewing its changes and actually reading the code that's being generated to ensure correctness is necessary. However, I am finding ways to automate that and reduce the incident rate of problems to even lower than my co-workers.

                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          D This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #127

                                          At that point, I think: Why not just write the code yourself?

                                          Writing the code is more fun that reviewing code, not to mention less error prone.

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups