Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Selfhosted
  3. ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI

ntfy.sh v2.18.0 was written by AI

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Selfhosted
selfhosted
142 Posts 95 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • exu@feditown.comE exu@feditown.com

    Do you know any? I've never really looked beyond ntfy.sh until now

    kilgore_trout@feddit.itK This user is from outside of this forum
    kilgore_trout@feddit.itK This user is from outside of this forum
    kilgore_trout@feddit.it
    wrote last edited by
    #94

    If you use ntfy for UnifiedPush: https://unifiedpush.org/users/distributors/

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O osanna@lemmy.vg

      Sigh. Time to switch to gotify

      G This user is from outside of this forum
      G This user is from outside of this forum
      greenknight23@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #95

      been using EMQX plus an MQTT client on my phone for a few months now, I like it better than gotify since the app was chewing through my battery like a vampire.

      it might be better now since my issues happened three-ish years ago.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world

        According to the release:

        Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

        The code was written by Cursor and Claude

        14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

        reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

        This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

        Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

        U This user is from outside of this forum
        U This user is from outside of this forum
        usernamenotfound404@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #96

        Lot of hate for a project maintained by a volunteer and offered for free here. Nobody forces this free stuff on you.

        possiblylinux127@lemmy.zipP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • xylight@lemdro.idX xylight@lemdro.id

          the linux kernel is on that list, bro it's time to switch!

          N This user is from outside of this forum
          N This user is from outside of this forum
          napkin2020@sh.itjust.works
          wrote last edited by
          #97

          Also Chrome, Firefox ans Ladybird!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tcb13@lemmy.worldT tcb13@lemmy.world

            Well, Telegram does the something for free.

            M This user is from outside of this forum
            M This user is from outside of this forum
            moonshadow@slrpnk.net
            wrote last edited by
            #98

            Telegram does the thing for your sweet juicy data

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN november@piefed.blahaj.zone

              Ugh, seriously? Great...

              (Edit) I don't think this is true? They use Mozilla's push services, but nothing about their Codeberg repo (yes, it's on Codeberg, not Github) indicates they're part of Mozilla.

              povoq@slrpnk.netP This user is from outside of this forum
              povoq@slrpnk.netP This user is from outside of this forum
              povoq@slrpnk.net
              wrote last edited by
              #99

              The app itself might be fine, but you are either using the Mozilla services or the backend written by Mozilla. Sadly Mozilla has lost all the good will it had and is just another silicon valley AI company these days, and seems to prefer it that way.

              november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U ueiqkkwhuwjw@lemmy.world

                According to the release:

                Adds experimental PostgreSQL support

                The code was written by Cursor and Claude

                14,997 added lines of code, and 10,202 lines removed

                reviewed and heavily tested over 2-3 weeks

                This makes me uneasy, especially as ntfy is an internet facing service. I am now looking for alternatives.

                Am I overreacting or do you all share the same concern?

                powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.deP This user is from outside of this forum
                powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.deP This user is from outside of this forum
                powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de
                wrote last edited by
                #100

                ts getting you pinned to 2.17 in the compose file 🥹🤞🥀

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C cecilkorik@piefed.ca

                  I think there's room for a little bit of nuance that page doesn't do a great job of describing. In my opinion there's a huge difference between volunteer maintainers using AI PR checks as a screening measure to ease their review burden and focusing their actual reviews on PRs that pass the AI checks, and AI-deranged lone developers flooding the code with "AI features" and slopping out 10kloc PRs for no obvious reason.

                  Just because a project is using AI code reviews or has an AGENTS.md is not necessarily a red flag. A yellow flag, maybe, but the evidence that the Linux Kernel itself is on that list should serve as an example of why you can't just kneejerk anti-AI here. If you know anything about Linus Torvalds you know he has zero tolerance for bad code, and the use of AI is not going to change that despite everyone's fears. If it doesn't work out, Linus will be the first one to throw it under the bus.

                  baner@lemmy.zipB This user is from outside of this forum
                  baner@lemmy.zipB This user is from outside of this forum
                  baner@lemmy.zip
                  wrote last edited by
                  #101

                  Upvote this guy

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se

                    It looks like that tool is more or less built by a single developer (you already trust their judgment anyways!), and even though the code came through in a single PR it was a merge from a branch that had 79 separate commits: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/pull/1619

                    Also glancing through it a bit, huge portions of that are straightforward refactors or even just formatting changes caused by adding a new backend option.

                    I'm not going to say it's fine, but they didn't just throw Claude at a problem and let it rewrite 25k lines of code unnecessarily.

                    mudkip@lemdro.idM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mudkip@lemdro.idM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mudkip@lemdro.id
                    wrote last edited by
                    #102

                    Any AI usage immediately discredits the software for me, because it calls into question all of their past and future work.

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kilgore_trout@feddit.itK kilgore_trout@feddit.it

                      Read the README

                      november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                      november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                      november@piefed.blahaj.zone
                      wrote last edited by
                      #103

                      How about you tell me what you see that I missed?

                      kilgore_trout@feddit.itK 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • povoq@slrpnk.netP povoq@slrpnk.net

                        The app itself might be fine, but you are either using the Mozilla services or the backend written by Mozilla. Sadly Mozilla has lost all the good will it had and is just another silicon valley AI company these days, and seems to prefer it that way.

                        november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                        november@piefed.blahaj.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                        november@piefed.blahaj.zone
                        wrote last edited by
                        #104

                        Sure. All I said was that it doesn't actually seem to be run by Mozilla, like you implied it was.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mudkip@lemdro.idM mudkip@lemdro.id

                          Any AI usage immediately discredits the software for me, because it calls into question all of their past and future work.

                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                          blarg_dunsen@sh.itjust.works
                          wrote last edited by
                          #105

                          Oh boy, do I have bad news about 90% of the internet for you...

                          mudkip@lemdro.idM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • xylight@lemdro.idX xylight@lemdro.id

                            the linux kernel is on that list, bro it's time to switch!

                            paequ2@lemmy.todayP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paequ2@lemmy.todayP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paequ2@lemmy.today
                            wrote last edited by
                            #106

                            Time to switch to Plan9!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C cecilkorik@piefed.ca

                              I think there's room for a little bit of nuance that page doesn't do a great job of describing. In my opinion there's a huge difference between volunteer maintainers using AI PR checks as a screening measure to ease their review burden and focusing their actual reviews on PRs that pass the AI checks, and AI-deranged lone developers flooding the code with "AI features" and slopping out 10kloc PRs for no obvious reason.

                              Just because a project is using AI code reviews or has an AGENTS.md is not necessarily a red flag. A yellow flag, maybe, but the evidence that the Linux Kernel itself is on that list should serve as an example of why you can't just kneejerk anti-AI here. If you know anything about Linus Torvalds you know he has zero tolerance for bad code, and the use of AI is not going to change that despite everyone's fears. If it doesn't work out, Linus will be the first one to throw it under the bus.

                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              W This user is from outside of this forum
                              witten@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #107

                              Lol my project has an AGENTS.md and its contents are basically, "Don't use AI agents on this codebase."

                              earmaster@lemmy.worldE 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • B blarg_dunsen@sh.itjust.works

                                Oh boy, do I have bad news about 90% of the internet for you...

                                mudkip@lemdro.idM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mudkip@lemdro.idM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mudkip@lemdro.id
                                wrote last edited by
                                #108

                                Linus sent an email recently to the Kernel Mailing List trashing AI slop and rejecting AI generated patches. The fact that he used it to play around with a script doesn't invalidate the fact that he distrusts code written by LLMs when it actually matters.

                                5 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M mirrorgiraffe@piefed.social

                                  Classic "test in production" strategy, very solid!

                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                                  callmemagnus@lemmy.world
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #109

                                  Consider a donation to help people providing you the open source software you seem to depend upon.

                                  Usage of a helper tool to perform tasks on code whether it is AI or the IDE internal features can reduce the work load of benevolent developers who has not asked you to use their softwares.

                                  Maybe the language was not appropriate but get real. With the little revenue generated by the usage of people complaining, the use of AI agentic coding might be the only way to bring features without pushing benevolent devs to burnout.

                                  Edit: to bring, not to being!

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mudkip@lemdro.idM mudkip@lemdro.id

                                    Linus sent an email recently to the Kernel Mailing List trashing AI slop and rejecting AI generated patches. The fact that he used it to play around with a script doesn't invalidate the fact that he distrusts code written by LLMs when it actually matters.

                                    5 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    5 This user is from outside of this forum
                                    5gruel@lemmy.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #110

                                    you mean this statement? https://www.theregister.com/2026/01/08/linus_versus_llms_ai_slop_docs/?td=rt-3a

                                    If yes, your statement does not really match what Linus said.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R railcar8095@lemmy.world

                                      Test in production is the best. We spent months warning from data bugs and nobody bat an eye (upstream bug, not our responsibility but we noticed)
                                      When it was d launched in prod we just pointed out the bug that nobody fixed was still there and immediately a war room was formed and the bug fixed within an hour.

                                      It honestly seems more efficient to let shit hit the fan than to fight everybody to do their job.

                                      H This user is from outside of this forum
                                      H This user is from outside of this forum
                                      hornedfiend@piefed.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #111

                                      Testing in production is the most idiotic last 10 years or so concept, which is mainly driven by incompetence of project managers.

                                      Imagine if you get sold a car by a company, for 100k, then it starts having major issues and the car company tells you: "we'll fix it".

                                      While that does not necessarily apply to software or services or webapps, the logic still stands. You are selling bugs to people. Bugs that could have been cought, with some risk management and planning.

                                      Edit: F-ing ios keyboard.

                                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G greenknight23@lemmy.world

                                        been using EMQX plus an MQTT client on my phone for a few months now, I like it better than gotify since the app was chewing through my battery like a vampire.

                                        it might be better now since my issues happened three-ish years ago.

                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cyber@feddit.uk
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #112

                                        This EMQX?

                                        Seems it's no longer FOSS?

                                        I've been using Gotify for a few notifications from Home Assistant and it doesn't appear to be eating my battery.

                                        It's a little more responsive than ntfy - sometimes ntfy doesn't alert for ages after the trigger (could be phone power saving the wifi...), but then I also get realerts from yesterday.... not had that with Gotify.

                                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C cyber@feddit.uk

                                          This EMQX?

                                          Seems it's no longer FOSS?

                                          I've been using Gotify for a few notifications from Home Assistant and it doesn't appear to be eating my battery.

                                          It's a little more responsive than ntfy - sometimes ntfy doesn't alert for ages after the trigger (could be phone power saving the wifi...), but then I also get realerts from yesterday.... not had that with Gotify.

                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          greenknight23@lemmy.world
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #113

                                          that's the one.

                                          FOSS or not, it still runs just fine on my infra. I prefer it over something like rabbitmq because it has a pretty slick admin webgui.

                                          I'll have to give gotify another try.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups