Oh.

[cr0w@infosec.exchange]

@huronbikes It's funny how in software, such small things can be catte-strophic.

[huronbikes@cyberplace.social]

@cR0w well, it's fine, it's not like NginX is used very much, for everything, all over. Also not like this affected the Kubernetes NginX ingress controller... very much...

[bws@social.linux.pizza]

@huronbikes @cR0w you mean the ingress controller which is EOL anyway?

[huronbikes@cyberplace.social]

@bws @cR0w EOL works so well certain former employers are definitely not using Windows Server 2012 in 2026. For critical business functionality. Very often.

[tomsellers@infosec.exchange]

@huronbikes @bws @cR0w

I actually came here to make a joke about that because there are TWO similarly named controllers:

• Ingress NGINX Controller: deprecated, owned by the K8s project
• NGINX Ingress Controller: still alive, owned by F5

[huronbikes@cyberplace.social]

@TomSellers @bws @cR0w that second one is definitely part of the advisory. Fun will be had by all.

[rootwyrm@weird.autos]

@TomSellers @huronbikes @bws @cR0w don't forget the dozens of OTHER 'nginx controllers' offered various places.

[eruonna@lgbtqia.space]

@cR0w maybe I should be happy they laid me off last year

[cr0w@infosec.exchange]

@eruonna Oof, IDK about that but I get it.

[nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange]

@huronbikes @bws @cR0w I've definitely never seen a Server 2012 in production.

Nope.

That would be CRAZY since it's EOL.

[fritzadalis@infosec.exchange]

@huronbikes @cR0w @cR0w
Isn't Big Ip that one Peter Gabriel song?