Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them.

I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
82 Posts 64 Posters 77 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hopeless@mas.toH hopeless@mas.to

    @mitchellh Let's hope OP never decides to get into politics. Because demonizing everyone who reached a different conclusion than him with "psychosis" came very naturally. There's no justification given for the use of the word in this context either.

    Link Preview Image
    concern troll - Wiktionary, the free dictionary

    favicon

    Wiktionary (en.wiktionary.org)

    unlofl@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
    unlofl@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
    unlofl@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    @hopeless Its a metaphor and the post explains their concern pretty well

    Can anyone help me find the downvote button here? My fedi client still only has one for "fav"

    immibis@social.immibis.comI 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pojntfx@mastodon.socialP pojntfx@mastodon.social

      @mitchellh One of the best descriptions I've heard lately was that it feels like "losing coworkers to dementia" as people adopt it, where everyone feels like they know everything, but when you talk with them in person or there is a problem that needs to be fixed _now_ it becomes very clear that the capability to do that has atrophied basically completely

      johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johannab@cosocial.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johannab@cosocial.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      @pojntfx @mitchellh holy goats, hadn’t hear that dementia analogy before but that is exactly it. I’ve lost elder family to dementia and when you’ve lived with it you realize that it is so much more than “forgetting”, it is literal decay of executive, cognitive capability. Not sure i hould say thanks for sharing that, i’m now going to see it everywhere. 😳

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

        I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

        I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

        It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

        The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

        We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

        I worry.

        nikclayton@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        nikclayton@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
        nikclayton@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        @mitchellh does this mean you're going to remove the "maintainers are exempt" language from https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/blob/main/AI_POLICY.md ?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

          I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

          I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

          It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

          The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

          We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

          I worry.

          tmcfarlane@toot.communityT This user is from outside of this forum
          tmcfarlane@toot.communityT This user is from outside of this forum
          tmcfarlane@toot.community
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          @mitchellh memories of the "microservices fix everything" brigade. We threw out easy integration testing and embraced distributed SPoFs

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

            I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

            I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

            It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

            The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

            We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

            I worry.

            jasongorman@mastodon.cloudJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jasongorman@mastodon.cloudJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jasongorman@mastodon.cloud
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            @mitchellh Also, the data's showing very clearly that MTTR is getting longer, probably because of growing comprehension debt.

            Link Preview Image
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lizbian@chaos.socialL lizbian@chaos.social

              @mitchellh @briankrebs I wholeheartedly believe that LLMs take away the most important part of programmers‘ jobs: creating something they can be proud of. And it’s replaced by instructing „someone“ else on creating the software and reviewing the result. Of course they’ll care less abut the quality if they weren’t the ones who created it. It’s like everyone has become a manager, and no-one is the actual creator of the systems being built.

              kekunplazas@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
              kekunplazas@mamot.frK This user is from outside of this forum
              kekunplazas@mamot.fr
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              @lizbian @mitchellh @briankrebs Yep, exactly my point since a pretty long time.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • pojntfx@mastodon.socialP pojntfx@mastodon.social

                @mitchellh One of the best descriptions I've heard lately was that it feels like "losing coworkers to dementia" as people adopt it, where everyone feels like they know everything, but when you talk with them in person or there is a problem that needs to be fixed _now_ it becomes very clear that the capability to do that has atrophied basically completely

                cczona@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                cczona@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                cczona@hachyderm.io
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                @pojntfx I lost a loved one to dementia, and have been saying for a while how similar LLM psychosis is to that experience.

                Carina C. Zona (@cczona@hachyderm.io)

                @Di4na @jenniferplusplus and there is already evidence emerging that engineers who depend on LLMs to write their code for them are eroding their skills. I would analogize it to early stage dementia. The person can't see how their judgement is gradually developing fissures that compromise their ability to function. Eventually it will become too clear to deny anymore. But right now they are increasingly impaired while no less confident in the comprehensiveness of their skills. It's the period when they present a big risk to self and others, because of the growing gap between reality and perception of competence. This person is letting LLMs draft most of their code, and fails to see that not continuing to hone their own skills as an active coder has personal consequences; and that doing so en masse poses societal consequences. What happens in a generation when there are virtually no engineers left who can review a LLM's outputs competently?

                favicon

                Hachyderm.io (hachyderm.io)

                Carina C. Zona (@cczona@hachyderm.io)

                @janl@narrativ.es I do feel in mourning. It's been very similar to when a relative developed dementia. The person I knew disappeared in jolting episodes, replaced by someone with their face but an unrecognizable personality and stripped of the values they'd held dear. It was deeply troubling and so, so sad to be around. In the past year I've been feeling that same sense of loss. Moving through the stages of grief for one person, then another, another. It's mentally exhausting. But when you care about someone or something, it's difficult to just decide to not let it matter.

                favicon

                Hachyderm.io (hachyderm.io)

                They think they are fine, while the person you used to know is gradually replaced by someone unrecognisable. Professional de-skilling issues aside, a sadder dimension to me is how AI psychosis degrades not only cognition but also social skills. So relationships deteriorate too, and at scale that will ultimately become communities and solidarity deteriorating as well. It's been disturbing to see people I care about lose interest in connecting at a human level, while grasping for the empty flattery of a large language model. Is this our future, truly?

                datenwolf@chaos.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S spacelifeform@infosec.exchange

                  @mitchellh

                  Ask them what they will do when their cloud is down.

                  Handwaving ensues. Fog rolls in.

                  immibis@social.immibis.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                  immibis@social.immibis.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                  immibis@social.immibis.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46
                  @SpaceLifeForm @mitchellh "When the cloud is down, it's foggy" - some kind of strange metaphor or pun
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • unlofl@mstdn.socialU unlofl@mstdn.social

                    @hopeless Its a metaphor and the post explains their concern pretty well

                    Can anyone help me find the downvote button here? My fedi client still only has one for "fav"

                    immibis@social.immibis.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                    immibis@social.immibis.comI This user is from outside of this forum
                    immibis@social.immibis.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47
                    @unlofl @hopeless There's no fediverse downvote by design, and the upvote/like/star doesn't do very much either. You can block people who continually spout nonsense.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

                      I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

                      I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

                      It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

                      The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

                      We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

                      I worry.

                      tenpasttwo@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tenpasttwo@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
                      tenpasttwo@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      @mitchellh
                      In the 90s we only optimised to MTBF, MTTR wasn't considered terribly helpful. A software deployment could run for months without restarts or updates. But back then a person could hold an entire stack in their minds. I recall my first realisation of the total shift to MTTR with an ML based written record reader. We outsourced the ML, each instance could read only 1 record before dying. My boss was nonfussed, just restart it anew for every record... Infra is now just bubbles popping.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

                        I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

                        I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

                        It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

                        The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

                        We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

                        I worry.

                        totoroot@ibe.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        totoroot@ibe.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        totoroot@ibe.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        @mitchellh@hachyderm.io Thanks for stating what many are seeing in our industry. Especially since your opinion bears a lot of weight.

                        I myself am trying to figure out how to voice concerns in the workplace and in the Open Source communities I participate in, while trying to not completely disregard the excitement people feel.

                        It becomes hard to argue with colleagues about the pros and cons of using LLMs in software engineering, when the CTO suggests an AI-first approach to anything, at any chance they get.

                        ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

                          I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

                          I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

                          It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

                          The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

                          We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

                          I worry.

                          ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          ambrosia_engine@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #50

                          @mitchellh I'm doing a PhD on the epistemic risks of LLMs. I used to work in industry and I see this too and it's so terrifying. Currently writing a paper looking at one of the mechanisms at play here, but how do we even talk to these people and get them help anymore? Especially when it's clear entire startups are affected.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • rebelgeek99@mastodon.socialR rebelgeek99@mastodon.social

                            @mitchellh @DukeDuke hadn't occurred to me that the AI psychosis may be a factor driving the enshittification of tech, but that makes perfect sense. I swear, COVID and genAI are our civilization's answer to Romans' lead pipes updated for the 21st century

                            kaffando@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kaffando@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kaffando@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #51

                            @RebelGeek99 @mitchellh @DukeDuke

                            What you've just said....yes. Exactly that.

                            Yes.

                            #COVIDBrain #AISlop

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

                              I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

                              I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

                              It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

                              The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

                              We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

                              I worry.

                              jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jwcph@helvede.net
                              wrote last edited by
                              #52

                              @mitchellh I guess that's within the realm of what @pluralistic often refers to at "working well but failing badly"...

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • totoroot@ibe.socialT totoroot@ibe.social

                                @mitchellh@hachyderm.io Thanks for stating what many are seeing in our industry. Especially since your opinion bears a lot of weight.

                                I myself am trying to figure out how to voice concerns in the workplace and in the Open Source communities I participate in, while trying to not completely disregard the excitement people feel.

                                It becomes hard to argue with colleagues about the pros and cons of using LLMs in software engineering, when the CTO suggests an AI-first approach to anything, at any chance they get.

                                ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ambrosia_engine@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #53

                                @totoroot @mitchellh Has this been a big problem for you in open source communities? LLM chatbots are a huge threat to open source, and as a community they tend to be more openly opposed to it.

                                Also FWIW, just hammering down literacy (if people know how these systems actually generate fluent explanation-shaped text) that goes a long way to mitigating adoption. Not full proof obviously looking at companies like OpenAI, but this does have a big impact.

                                tombarys@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

                                  I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

                                  I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

                                  It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

                                  The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

                                  We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

                                  I worry.

                                  f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  f4grx@chaos.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #54

                                  @mitchellh the other problem is that all of this depends on a very small number of capitalist giants with billions of debts and a broken business model. Everyone is acting like claude will fix bugs in spaghetti code forever, but all this could be in deep bankruptcy in a few years, with no one able to fix slop bugs anymore. That will be fun. So many popcorn.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mitchellh@hachyderm.ioM mitchellh@hachyderm.io

                                    I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out.

                                    I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really).

                                    It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely.

                                    The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture.

                                    We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying.

                                    I worry.

                                    masaers@mastodon.nuM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    masaers@mastodon.nuM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    masaers@mastodon.nu
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #55

                                    @mitchellh Thank you for an interesting take! It got me thinking (from a statistics perspective) about MTBF and MTTR. The whole ”mean time” thing worries me. Time is strictly positive, so the median time must be higher than the mean time. Outliers will happen, and for MTBF that’s a good thing, while for MTTR it is not. In other words: a measurement of MTBF is pessimistic and conservative, while a measurement of MTTR is optimistic and a fluke away from disaster.

                                    masaers@mastodon.nuM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • masaers@mastodon.nuM masaers@mastodon.nu

                                      @mitchellh Thank you for an interesting take! It got me thinking (from a statistics perspective) about MTBF and MTTR. The whole ”mean time” thing worries me. Time is strictly positive, so the median time must be higher than the mean time. Outliers will happen, and for MTBF that’s a good thing, while for MTTR it is not. In other words: a measurement of MTBF is pessimistic and conservative, while a measurement of MTTR is optimistic and a fluke away from disaster.

                                      masaers@mastodon.nuM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      masaers@mastodon.nuM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      masaers@mastodon.nu
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #56

                                      @mitchellh In hindsight I suppose no one is surprised at all, but do you have any memory of anyone taking that additional pass at basic reasoning at the time?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA ambrosia_engine@mastodon.social

                                        @totoroot @mitchellh Has this been a big problem for you in open source communities? LLM chatbots are a huge threat to open source, and as a community they tend to be more openly opposed to it.

                                        Also FWIW, just hammering down literacy (if people know how these systems actually generate fluent explanation-shaped text) that goes a long way to mitigating adoption. Not full proof obviously looking at companies like OpenAI, but this does have a big impact.

                                        tombarys@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tombarys@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tombarys@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #57

                                        @ambrosia_engine @totoroot @mitchellh Good point with the literacy. Even I am not in the industry I signed-up for two ML courses on my alma-mater at Masaryk University to better understand how it works. During courses I slowly lost any residual feeling of “magic” and “allmightyness” and stopped using LLM with exception for limited couching in coding which is my hobby (with a deliberately introduced friction and docs-checking). It helps when I can explain deeper insights to others.

                                        tombarys@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tombarys@mastodon.socialT tombarys@mastodon.social

                                          @ambrosia_engine @totoroot @mitchellh Good point with the literacy. Even I am not in the industry I signed-up for two ML courses on my alma-mater at Masaryk University to better understand how it works. During courses I slowly lost any residual feeling of “magic” and “allmightyness” and stopped using LLM with exception for limited couching in coding which is my hobby (with a deliberately introduced friction and docs-checking). It helps when I can explain deeper insights to others.

                                          tombarys@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tombarys@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                          tombarys@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #58

                                          @ambrosia_engine @totoroot @mitchellh + I consider very useful to go through algorithms like Word2Vec which is highly comprehensible and de-mystifying in some way. Even it is not the same LLMs do, the intuition of word embeddings is there very clear. It can reveal a lot of “the basic math only” that is actually going on in it. This is a great article with informative visuals: https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-word2vec/

                                          tombarys@mastodon.socialT ambrosia_engine@mastodon.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups