Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users."

Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
15 Posts 9 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

    RE: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116670688015956223

    Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users." Dashlane said there was no evidence of a hack of its own systems, but it hasn't shared yet why or how that 2FA was compromised. The company said “the goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts,” and that it has already notified affected users.

    Just a moment...

    favicon

    (support.dashlane.com)

    koehntopp@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
    koehntopp@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
    koehntopp@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @briankrebs
    Brute force 2FA...?

    That does not sound like something that should be successfully possible? Wouldn't you have to know the password before that, too?

    briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

      RE: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116670688015956223

      Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users." Dashlane said there was no evidence of a hack of its own systems, but it hasn't shared yet why or how that 2FA was compromised. The company said “the goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts,” and that it has already notified affected users.

      Just a moment...

      favicon

      (support.dashlane.com)

      shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
      shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
      shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.club
      wrote last edited by
      #4
      @briankrebs hmm I'm not familiar with how dashlane works, but how did they reach 2fa? I guess their
      master password was weak?
      gareth@tenforward.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • koehntopp@infosec.exchangeK koehntopp@infosec.exchange

        @briankrebs
        Brute force 2FA...?

        That does not sound like something that should be successfully possible? Wouldn't you have to know the password before that, too?

        briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
        briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
        briankrebs@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @koehntopp I had the same question. Seems to me, the only way brute-force is useful as an attack is if you can by default try a large number of possible combinations at once, but they're saying that rate limiting was what caused the affected accounts to get locked out the other day. Something isn't adding up.

        koehntopp@infosec.exchangeK shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.clubS 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

          RE: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116670688015956223

          Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users." Dashlane said there was no evidence of a hack of its own systems, but it hasn't shared yet why or how that 2FA was compromised. The company said “the goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts,” and that it has already notified affected users.

          Just a moment...

          favicon

          (support.dashlane.com)

          tony@toot.hoyle.me.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
          tony@toot.hoyle.me.ukT This user is from outside of this forum
          tony@toot.hoyle.me.uk
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @briankrebs Is their 2FA not normal 2FA then? I'd expect a 6 digit code that changed every 30 seconds or so.. brute forcing that would be incredibly unlikely.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
          • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

            @koehntopp I had the same question. Seems to me, the only way brute-force is useful as an attack is if you can by default try a large number of possible combinations at once, but they're saying that rate limiting was what caused the affected accounts to get locked out the other day. Something isn't adding up.

            koehntopp@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
            koehntopp@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
            koehntopp@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @briankrebs
            Well, there's a recent surge of sites where the default after entering your email is you're being sent a code to that email - THAT is something that would not require knowing the password, but it's also not 2FA (well, not as we'd use that word, anyway)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

              @koehntopp I had the same question. Seems to me, the only way brute-force is useful as an attack is if you can by default try a large number of possible combinations at once, but they're saying that rate limiting was what caused the affected accounts to get locked out the other day. Something isn't adding up.

              shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
              shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.clubS This user is from outside of this forum
              shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.club
              wrote last edited by
              #8
              @briankrebs @koehntopp I could imagine one scenario where if they allow adding a second device base on only 2fa (stupid) then you can try a lot of users and someone will be hit just by chance and the rate limit would not apply.
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                RE: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116670688015956223

                Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users." Dashlane said there was no evidence of a hack of its own systems, but it hasn't shared yet why or how that 2FA was compromised. The company said “the goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts,” and that it has already notified affected users.

                Just a moment...

                favicon

                (support.dashlane.com)

                netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @briankrebs the fact that Dashlane allowed 2FA to be brute forced instead of raising timeouts and warning users is what worries me.

                • Tho granted, what else did I expect from a proprietary SaaS-only "solution" that literally infringed on John Deere's logo in the past (which I presume was the reason they changed their logo some time ago!)…
                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                  RE: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116670688015956223

                  Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users." Dashlane said there was no evidence of a hack of its own systems, but it hasn't shared yet why or how that 2FA was compromised. The company said “the goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts,” and that it has already notified affected users.

                  Just a moment...

                  favicon

                  (support.dashlane.com)

                  pl@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pl@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pl@cosocial.ca
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @briankrebs brute-forcing 2FA? Like they brute-forced the 2FA codes? There was no rate limiting? No failure after N tries? That's not really better

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.clubS shironeko@fedi.tesaguri.club
                    @briankrebs hmm I'm not familiar with how dashlane works, but how did they reach 2fa? I guess their
                    master password was weak?
                    gareth@tenforward.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gareth@tenforward.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gareth@tenforward.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @shironeko @briankrebs
                    If they knew the master password then the whole vault is compromised as they got an encrypted offline copy of that too

                    Terrifying.

                    I eagerly await updates on this as more facts are discovered…

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                      RE: https://infosec.exchange/@briankrebs/116670688015956223

                      Dashlane posted an update saying hackers brute-forced its two-factor authentication system, and gained access to the encrypted password vaults for "fewer than 20 personal plan users." Dashlane said there was no evidence of a hack of its own systems, but it hasn't shared yet why or how that 2FA was compromised. The company said “the goal of the attack was to brute-force two-factor authentication (2FA) protections to allow the attacker to register new devices on existing user accounts,” and that it has already notified affected users.

                      Just a moment...

                      favicon

                      (support.dashlane.com)

                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dalias@hachyderm.io
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @briankrebs "gained access to the encrypted password vaults" sounds like they weren't encrypted.

                      Unless they mean the attackers only gained access to what amounts to random bits.

                      briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                        @briankrebs "gained access to the encrypted password vaults" sounds like they weren't encrypted.

                        Unless they mean the attackers only gained access to what amounts to random bits.

                        briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                        briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                        briankrebs@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @dalias They got access to 20 encrypted vaults. They'd still have to work out the master password for those targeted accounts. Theoretically, that could be done offline, as happened w/ the breach at LastPass, but it took many months for a lot of those stolen vaults to be cracked.

                        dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                          @dalias They got access to 20 encrypted vaults. They'd still have to work out the master password for those targeted accounts. Theoretically, that could be done offline, as happened w/ the breach at LastPass, but it took many months for a lot of those stolen vaults to be cracked.

                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dalias@hachyderm.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @briankrebs Ahhh, that makes sense. So if they have strong passphrases, nothing. But if weak, crackable offline with big resources.

                          briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                            @briankrebs Ahhh, that makes sense. So if they have strong passphrases, nothing. But if weak, crackable offline with big resources.

                            briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                            briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB This user is from outside of this forum
                            briankrebs@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @dalias You got it. Put that dusty old bitcoin mining botnet to work on it!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups