As a software developer who took an elective in neural networks - when people call LLMs stochastic parrots, that's not criticism of their results.
-
@troed
Be specific. "We don't know that" does not tell me anything about which part of my reply you are referring to.Especially as my comment was a combination of obvious statements and claims that we don't know.
@leeloo We don't know that there are other things happening in the brain than what we have already documented.
The belief that there's "magic" happening in the brain is part of the argument between dualists and monists - that there's somehow a "mind" that's separate from the body. So far we've found nothing to support such a claim.
(My own studies in neuroscience are a decade old but I do follow the discourse)
-
@lmorchard @leeloo @wolf480pl I guess part of it is maybe that I don't think intelligence is some exclusively human thing. LLMs clearly aren't human-like intelligent. I'm personally confident they're not as intelligent as any primate.
But are they as intelligent as a shrimp? I think they've got to be more intelligent than a mosquito.
I wouldn't turn to a shrimp for advice but they're not *without* intelligence.
@dragonfrog
I think an ML model trained to speedrun a platformer game is intelligent like a mosquito, but LLMs probably aren't.
@lmorchard @leeloo -
@leeloo We don't know that there are other things happening in the brain than what we have already documented.
The belief that there's "magic" happening in the brain is part of the argument between dualists and monists - that there's somehow a "mind" that's separate from the body. So far we've found nothing to support such a claim.
(My own studies in neuroscience are a decade old but I do follow the discourse)
@troed
If we are nothing but input -> math -> output, then human rights don't matter. Murdering someone is no different from switching a device off.If that's the world view you want to argue, that's on you.
It also assumes that there are nothing left to discover. Which has been a mistake every time anyone has made the claim in any other area. Are humans really that much simpler than the rest of the universe?
To be clear, I did not say that there is any kind of magic involved in human intelligence. I said that the part of "AI" that people get on the defence over when we reduce it to math and software is magic, because unlike humans - where I must remind you that I said we don't know - we know exacly what those datacenters are doing: Math and software.
-
@troed
If we are nothing but input -> math -> output, then human rights don't matter. Murdering someone is no different from switching a device off.If that's the world view you want to argue, that's on you.
It also assumes that there are nothing left to discover. Which has been a mistake every time anyone has made the claim in any other area. Are humans really that much simpler than the rest of the universe?
To be clear, I did not say that there is any kind of magic involved in human intelligence. I said that the part of "AI" that people get on the defence over when we reduce it to math and software is magic, because unlike humans - where I must remind you that I said we don't know - we know exacly what those datacenters are doing: Math and software.
@leeloo I'm not arguing for a worldview - I'm just talking about what's the current state of science on the topic.
-
@leeloo I'm not arguing for a worldview - I'm just talking about what's the current state of science on the topic.
@troed
Yet you couldn't simply let my claim stand that we don't know what lied beyond the current state. -
@troed
Yet you couldn't simply let my claim stand that we don't know what lied beyond the current state.@leeloo My simple input was that "Humans are too!" is an excellent way to answer people bringing up stochastic parrots. Saying that there might be things we don't know about is a bit hand-wavey - it's not an actual argument based in science.
-
@leeloo My simple input was that "Humans are too!" is an excellent way to answer people bringing up stochastic parrots. Saying that there might be things we don't know about is a bit hand-wavey - it's not an actual argument based in science.
@troed
Now you are back to arguing a world view that would allow murder. -
@troed
Now you are back to arguing a world view that would allow murder.@leeloo I like science. I believe that if more discussions were based in facts the world would be a lot better. I apologize if you feel differently.
-
@leeloo I like science. I believe that if more discussions were based in facts the world would be a lot better. I apologize if you feel differently.
@troed
Using science to excuse promoting a world view that is fine with murder - now you are starting to sound German...(1930/40'es German for those who need everything spelled out).
-
@troed
Using science to excuse promoting a world view that is fine with murder - now you are starting to sound German...(1930/40'es German for those who need everything spelled out).
@leeloo Or maybe I'm advocating a world that won't allow slavery of digital consciousnesses?
The Coming Cognitive Disbelief
Both humans and large language models (LLMs) are fundamentally statistical pattern-matching systems with no inherent consciousness or "magic"
Things I couldn't find elsewhere (blog.troed.se)
-
@leeloo Or maybe I'm advocating a world that won't allow slavery of digital consciousnesses?
The Coming Cognitive Disbelief
Both humans and large language models (LLMs) are fundamentally statistical pattern-matching systems with no inherent consciousness or "magic"
Things I couldn't find elsewhere (blog.troed.se)
@troed
Ah, so you are the exact kind of person I was talking about in my first post. -
@troed
Ah, so you are the exact kind of person I was talking about in my first post.@leeloo Probably - and you're the kind of person who believe humans contain magic fairy dust
