Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 1960s: Power to the people2026: Power for the people.

1960s: Power to the people2026: Power for the people.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
solarwindrenewablesevsenergy
4 Posts 4 Posters 11 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • petergleick@fediscience.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    petergleick@fediscience.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
    petergleick@fediscience.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    1960s: Power to the people
    2026: Power for the people.

    Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.

    They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
    #energy

    U numodular@c.imN adritheonly@mastodon.socialA 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

      1960s: Power to the people
      2026: Power for the people.

      Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.

      They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
      #energy

      U This user is from outside of this forum
      U This user is from outside of this forum
      unknowable@troet.cafe
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @petergleick Yeah, and then there is Belgium, good Luck to those close to Tihange... untucking believable!

      Link Preview Image
      Belgium seeks nationalization of nuclear power plants

      Belgium is reversing its decadeslong phasing-out course, seeking more energy independence by reviving its nuclear plants.

      favicon

      dw.com (www.dw.com)

      Link Preview Image
      Belgium seeks control of its nuclear reactors to secure energy supply

      Brussels believes the solution to soaring energy prices as a result of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the war in the Middle East is to permanently transition away from fossil fuels.

      favicon

      euronews (www.euronews.com)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

        1960s: Power to the people
        2026: Power for the people.

        Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.

        They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
        #energy

        numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
        numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
        numodular@c.im
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @petergleick Capitalism has been a 'golden retriever' for greed driven abuse of power.

        Make #BehavioralScience #CoreEducation or #BackIntoCaves

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • petergleick@fediscience.orgP petergleick@fediscience.org

          1960s: Power to the people
          2026: Power for the people.

          Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.

          They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
          #energy

          adritheonly@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          adritheonly@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
          adritheonly@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @petergleick They make more money investing in oil since oil companies have zero expenses when it comes to environmental protection and oil production is subsidized with tax money?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups