1960s: Power to the people2026: Power for the people.
-
1960s: Power to the people
2026: Power for the people.Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.
They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
#energy -
1960s: Power to the people
2026: Power for the people.Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.
They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
#energy@petergleick Yeah, and then there is Belgium, good Luck to those close to Tihange... untucking believable!
https://www.dw.com/en/belgium-seeks-nationalization-of-nuclear-power-plants/a-76993170
-
1960s: Power to the people
2026: Power for the people.Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.
They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
#energy@petergleick Capitalism has been a 'golden retriever' for greed driven abuse of power.
-
1960s: Power to the people
2026: Power for the people.Every Republican should be asked why they hate #solar, #wind, #renewables, #EVs. And every answer they give (except "we're paid to do so by fossil-fuel companies") is a lie or wrong.
They are cheaper, faster, safer, cleaner.
#energy@petergleick They make more money investing in oil since oil companies have zero expenses when it comes to environmental protection and oil production is subsidized with tax money?
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
