If it’s funded with public money, it should be public code.
-
If it’s funded with public money, it should be public code.
That means guaranteeing the 4 freedoms:
Use the code
Study how it works
️ Modify it
Share itDo you agree?
️ Sign the open letter
Share it with your network
️ Call on decision-makers to invest in public code -
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic onR relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic on
-
If it’s funded with public money, it should be public code.
That means guaranteeing the 4 freedoms:
Use the code Study how it works️ Modify it Share itDo you agree?
️ Sign the open letter Share it with your network️ Call on decision-makers to invest in public code@fsfe This should be so uncontroversial, yet the system is so broken.
In our own experience as a for profit organisation willing to release as free and open source the results of (partially) public funded projects we are held back mainly by public research institutions. -
If it’s funded with public money, it should be public code.
That means guaranteeing the 4 freedoms:
Use the code Study how it works️ Modify it Share itDo you agree?
️ Sign the open letter Share it with your network️ Call on decision-makers to invest in public code@fsfe I'd even prefer: if it's public code it has to be founded by public money
-
If it’s funded with public money, it should be public code.
That means guaranteeing the 4 freedoms:
Use the code Study how it works️ Modify it Share itDo you agree?
️ Sign the open letter Share it with your network️ Call on decision-makers to invest in public code@fsfe I boosted this then remembered that I have participated in many coding projects using public funds from my university. Most flopped.
