Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Why is #Netanyahu not in The Hague already for war crimes?

Why is #Netanyahu not in The Hague already for war crimes?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
netanyahu
3 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Why is #Netanyahu not in The Hague already for war crimes?

    Why do so called ‘military lawyers’ consider white phosphorus fine when used to hide their own side’s troop movements - surely exposing them to toxic fumes and risk of chemical burns? But it’s illegal when used on opponent’s built up civilian areas?

    Why is the enforced movement of civilians from opponent’s homelands considered a safe and responsible thing to do? Creating a ‘buffer zone’ is in what way legal?

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/25/israel-white-phosphorus-south-lebanon-researchers

    jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ gavin57@toot.walesG 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.social

      Why is #Netanyahu not in The Hague already for war crimes?

      Why do so called ‘military lawyers’ consider white phosphorus fine when used to hide their own side’s troop movements - surely exposing them to toxic fumes and risk of chemical burns? But it’s illegal when used on opponent’s built up civilian areas?

      Why is the enforced movement of civilians from opponent’s homelands considered a safe and responsible thing to do? Creating a ‘buffer zone’ is in what way legal?

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/25/israel-white-phosphorus-south-lebanon-researchers

      jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      According to a report by the Lebanese non-profit Public Works Studio, white phosphorus was used to burn more than 2,000 hectares (4,940 acres) of southern Lebanese countryside, “including 873 hectares of dense forest with gum trees and vast areas covered with oak and pine trees”.

      #WhitePhosphorus can also lie hidden in the soil and spontaneously combust when uncovered by farmers, posing a continuing threat if the people of south #Lebanon are able to return to their homes.’

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.socialJ jugglingwitheggs@mstdn.social

        Why is #Netanyahu not in The Hague already for war crimes?

        Why do so called ‘military lawyers’ consider white phosphorus fine when used to hide their own side’s troop movements - surely exposing them to toxic fumes and risk of chemical burns? But it’s illegal when used on opponent’s built up civilian areas?

        Why is the enforced movement of civilians from opponent’s homelands considered a safe and responsible thing to do? Creating a ‘buffer zone’ is in what way legal?

        https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/25/israel-white-phosphorus-south-lebanon-researchers

        gavin57@toot.walesG This user is from outside of this forum
        gavin57@toot.walesG This user is from outside of this forum
        gavin57@toot.wales
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @JugglingWithEggs I think the ICC needs to get itself off Office 365 first. https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/18/microsoft_asks_uk_parliament_to_correct_record/

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups