Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Ashley does things like write online textbooks for open neuroscience datasets.

Ashley does things like write online textbooks for open neuroscience datasets.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
21 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

    Or maybe just a general real-world research basics guide to becoming a better *reader* of all the studies you might see that come out about developers and technical problem-solving and technical work?

    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    grimalkina@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    Or perhaps open shared community datasets needs to be the thing that exists first, and then materials to learn with them. I have been thinking about the possibilities of this the next time I get the space to run open science through Catharsis (ever optimistically assuming I can). I have been thinking for a long while that the only way we get out from the passive recipient model that "big industry report about developers" teaches us, is thinking of this as a real scientific practice

    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG shapr@recurse.socialS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

      Or maybe just a general real-world research basics guide to becoming a better *reader* of all the studies you might see that come out about developers and technical problem-solving and technical work?

      mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
      mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
      mayintoronto@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @grimalkina yes please!!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

        Or perhaps open shared community datasets needs to be the thing that exists first, and then materials to learn with them. I have been thinking about the possibilities of this the next time I get the space to run open science through Catharsis (ever optimistically assuming I can). I have been thinking for a long while that the only way we get out from the passive recipient model that "big industry report about developers" teaches us, is thinking of this as a real scientific practice

        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        grimalkina@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        For Ashley, there are explicit funding sources for this curricula and teaching work (not enough of course). I've seen how she never could have carved out time for this without some funding -- and frankly it's time away from our life together, of course I deeply support it, but just to be honest about the continual cost -- and it's the kind of thing that has impact outward on many but isn't much rewarded on a single campus. That makes it right for a grant.

        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

          For Ashley, there are explicit funding sources for this curricula and teaching work (not enough of course). I've seen how she never could have carved out time for this without some funding -- and frankly it's time away from our life together, of course I deeply support it, but just to be honest about the continual cost -- and it's the kind of thing that has impact outward on many but isn't much rewarded on a single campus. That makes it right for a grant.

          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          grimalkina@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          For me and the work I've carved out for myself there are no such mechanisms, understandably because I know I'm not at a university. But I do wish that tech organizations could think bigger about who builds for tech communities and how. At any rate, it is interesting to think about Catharsis as a potential vehicle for my open science work; that was how I did the Learning in the Dark study, funded freely giving back with enough client work.

          I don't know if that's possible in this market

          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG mayintoronto@beige.partyM 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

            For me and the work I've carved out for myself there are no such mechanisms, understandably because I know I'm not at a university. But I do wish that tech organizations could think bigger about who builds for tech communities and how. At any rate, it is interesting to think about Catharsis as a potential vehicle for my open science work; that was how I did the Learning in the Dark study, funded freely giving back with enough client work.

            I don't know if that's possible in this market

            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            grimalkina@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            Hopefully this isn't thinking out loud too much but I always find it useful when I see other people sharing their thoughts in progress, so these are some of the things I'm dwelling on

            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG mhoye@cosocial.caM 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

              For me and the work I've carved out for myself there are no such mechanisms, understandably because I know I'm not at a university. But I do wish that tech organizations could think bigger about who builds for tech communities and how. At any rate, it is interesting to think about Catharsis as a potential vehicle for my open science work; that was how I did the Learning in the Dark study, funded freely giving back with enough client work.

              I don't know if that's possible in this market

              mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
              mayintoronto@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
              mayintoronto@beige.party
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @grimalkina Well, trends in hiring looks like the market is improving. Maybe things will start picking up for you too?

              grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mayintoronto@beige.partyM mayintoronto@beige.party

                @grimalkina Well, trends in hiring looks like the market is improving. Maybe things will start picking up for you too?

                grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                grimalkina@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @mayintoronto one can only hope!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                  Or perhaps open shared community datasets needs to be the thing that exists first, and then materials to learn with them. I have been thinking about the possibilities of this the next time I get the space to run open science through Catharsis (ever optimistically assuming I can). I have been thinking for a long while that the only way we get out from the passive recipient model that "big industry report about developers" teaches us, is thinking of this as a real scientific practice

                  shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  shapr@recurse.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  shapr@recurse.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @grimalkina me and a friend enjoy doing the occasional weekend where we dig into open datasets.

                  We discovered that Harvard owns the largest $ of real estate in Boston. I think it was five Billion.

                  I'd planned to look for "slumlords" but many rental units are owned by a corporation that owns only that building, so the real owners are shrouded 😔

                  I would certainly enjoy digging into open datasets!

                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                    Hopefully this isn't thinking out loud too much but I always find it useful when I see other people sharing their thoughts in progress, so these are some of the things I'm dwelling on

                    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    grimalkina@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    Ashley's interactive online textbook, with its lessons that were tested with real-world learners, was supported by the Kavli Foundation. While there is an explosion of data in neuroscience, many are rightfully recognizing that for us to benefit from that explosion of data, we need to pursue goals they name as Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR)

                    Link Preview Image
                    Open Data in Neuroscience

                    The Kavli Foundation is dedicated to advancing science for the benefit of humanity.

                    favicon

                    Kavli Foundation (www.kavlifoundation.org)

                    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                      Ashley's interactive online textbook, with its lessons that were tested with real-world learners, was supported by the Kavli Foundation. While there is an explosion of data in neuroscience, many are rightfully recognizing that for us to benefit from that explosion of data, we need to pursue goals they name as Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR)

                      Link Preview Image
                      Open Data in Neuroscience

                      The Kavli Foundation is dedicated to advancing science for the benefit of humanity.

                      favicon

                      Kavli Foundation (www.kavlifoundation.org)

                      grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grimalkina@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      We interviewed Saskia de Vries about open science in this episode of Change, Technically, by the way!

                      Link Preview Image
                      Open science: hope is other people - Change, Technically

                      Much like open source software, open science is a path to distributed collaboration. By sharing the data from experiments and investigations open and available, scientists can multiply impact and discovery for teams they've never even met.Our guest, Saskia de Vries, talks to us about her work at ...

                      favicon

                      Buzzsprout (www.changetechnically.fyi)

                      grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                        We interviewed Saskia de Vries about open science in this episode of Change, Technically, by the way!

                        Link Preview Image
                        Open science: hope is other people - Change, Technically

                        Much like open source software, open science is a path to distributed collaboration. By sharing the data from experiments and investigations open and available, scientists can multiply impact and discovery for teams they've never even met.Our guest, Saskia de Vries, talks to us about her work at ...

                        favicon

                        Buzzsprout (www.changetechnically.fyi)

                        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        grimalkina@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        It is frustrating to me that software development is such an enormous world, of such importance to both the people in it and to the functioning of....everything....and we have few visions for open science around the experiences of human beings here doing this work.

                        It was incredibly difficult already in my career to get buy-in for even just open PUBLISHING. Now I am pushing at something far more radical, because in tech, sharing data is essentially a radioactive concept.

                        grimalkina@mastodon.socialG ricko@tech.lgbtR 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                          It is frustrating to me that software development is such an enormous world, of such importance to both the people in it and to the functioning of....everything....and we have few visions for open science around the experiences of human beings here doing this work.

                          It was incredibly difficult already in my career to get buy-in for even just open PUBLISHING. Now I am pushing at something far more radical, because in tech, sharing data is essentially a radioactive concept.

                          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                          grimalkina@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          Thankfully I have models that inspire me that are not from tech.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • shapr@recurse.socialS shapr@recurse.social

                            @grimalkina me and a friend enjoy doing the occasional weekend where we dig into open datasets.

                            We discovered that Harvard owns the largest $ of real estate in Boston. I think it was five Billion.

                            I'd planned to look for "slumlords" but many rental units are owned by a corporation that owns only that building, so the real owners are shrouded 😔

                            I would certainly enjoy digging into open datasets!

                            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                            grimalkina@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #15

                            @shapr I bet lots of people would! Yet another reason datasets shouldn't just stay locked under one researcher. You never know how much other people will uncover if they become shared resources.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                              Hopefully this isn't thinking out loud too much but I always find it useful when I see other people sharing their thoughts in progress, so these are some of the things I'm dwelling on

                              mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mhoye@cosocial.ca
                              wrote last edited by
                              #16

                              @grimalkina A thing I've been meaning to ask you, particularly about research into sociology and the performance of teams, is "what do the first steps into this mindset look like in practice". As in: I'm a young, relatively inexperienced manager, recently in a new leadership role. What should I do (or avoid), when I'm trying to propose and show evidence for change, to be confident I'm asking a question that matters, and get (and responsibly interpret!) data that actually informs that question?

                              mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                @grimalkina A thing I've been meaning to ask you, particularly about research into sociology and the performance of teams, is "what do the first steps into this mindset look like in practice". As in: I'm a young, relatively inexperienced manager, recently in a new leadership role. What should I do (or avoid), when I'm trying to propose and show evidence for change, to be confident I'm asking a question that matters, and get (and responsibly interpret!) data that actually informs that question?

                                mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #17

                                @grimalkina I guess this is sort of like asking, what is the "med students make a scientific poster" version for your field for new participants. I was going to say "high school science fairs" but then I realized that science fairs are sort of a gateway drug to the whole social process of science that keeps getting more elaborate and ceremonialized as the number of letters you accumulate after your name gets more involved.

                                grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mhoye@cosocial.caM mhoye@cosocial.ca

                                  @grimalkina I guess this is sort of like asking, what is the "med students make a scientific poster" version for your field for new participants. I was going to say "high school science fairs" but then I realized that science fairs are sort of a gateway drug to the whole social process of science that keeps getting more elaborate and ceremonialized as the number of letters you accumulate after your name gets more involved.

                                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  grimalkina@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #18

                                  @mhoye I like that a lot and I need to give it some thought. I think in my consulting I end up at a version of this: here is the bare minimum way you can add one vetted, scientifically-robust measure (e.g. of learning culture) of the human part of software, often strategically in a pre existing survey, or add a couple of interviews done in a structured way, and here are the top 2-3 pitfalls I want you to guard against. That is a basic evidence consulting package we often end up at

                                  grimalkina@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                    @mhoye I like that a lot and I need to give it some thought. I think in my consulting I end up at a version of this: here is the bare minimum way you can add one vetted, scientifically-robust measure (e.g. of learning culture) of the human part of software, often strategically in a pre existing survey, or add a couple of interviews done in a structured way, and here are the top 2-3 pitfalls I want you to guard against. That is a basic evidence consulting package we often end up at

                                    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grimalkina@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    grimalkina@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #19

                                    @mhoye but I think some elements you are drawing rightful attention to are the ritual and the belonging that comes from pre-existing forms. It IS really hard to be the person who does the first social sciencey-kind of measure inside of an engineering organization and one of the reasons I want to work out loud and share so much is because I want people to know they're not alone and that there is a bigger community of knowledge they can feel part of. Not sure how we build that but essential

                                    mhoye@cosocial.caM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                      It is frustrating to me that software development is such an enormous world, of such importance to both the people in it and to the functioning of....everything....and we have few visions for open science around the experiences of human beings here doing this work.

                                      It was incredibly difficult already in my career to get buy-in for even just open PUBLISHING. Now I am pushing at something far more radical, because in tech, sharing data is essentially a radioactive concept.

                                      ricko@tech.lgbtR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ricko@tech.lgbtR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ricko@tech.lgbt
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #20

                                      @grimalkina In a recent job interview, for a medical device cloud software company, I got asked:

                                      What do you think your deliverables and accomplishments could be after the first 30 days at this job?

                                      I gave my usual answer:

                                      Not software. I spend the first month at any new job just asking questions and gathering stories. I focus hard on confidence: what are the places where devs tread lightly? Where do they have a nagging fear of the bus factor? What activities do they avoid? I find I my biggest impact is not from "10x tools", but from simple fixes to the scary parts. Confident is faster and safer.

                                      The interviewer wasn't prepared for that answer and moved on quickly.

                                      Later, when asked if I had any questions, I came back to the topic: where did the interviewer see their people losing confidence?

                                      They had no answer for it. And couldn't come up with anything when pressed.

                                      It amazes me how many leaders forget the human parts of building tech. It seems almost willfully avoidant.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • grimalkina@mastodon.socialG grimalkina@mastodon.social

                                        @mhoye but I think some elements you are drawing rightful attention to are the ritual and the belonging that comes from pre-existing forms. It IS really hard to be the person who does the first social sciencey-kind of measure inside of an engineering organization and one of the reasons I want to work out loud and share so much is because I want people to know they're not alone and that there is a bigger community of knowledge they can feel part of. Not sure how we build that but essential

                                        mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mhoye@cosocial.caM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mhoye@cosocial.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #21

                                        @grimalkina Oh, absolutely - being the first person to try to make change in a new way is a huge hill that's basically invisible to anyone who isn't trying to climb it. I wonder if there maybe something like an on-ramp to "vetted, scientifically-robust" that would make "we need vetting" more accessible? Like, what does a starting attempt at empirically informed change need, to be visibly a plausible attempt at rigor, morally defensible and not obvious nonsense.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups