Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
64 Posts 51 Posters 36 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

    we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

    but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

    so what do you envision this might be?

    for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

    fulk_it@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    fulk_it@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    fulk_it@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @davidgerard I guess it depends on how much damage is done to internal codebases. Most of the time we'll prefer to start over from scratch is my guess. New winners and losers will emerge from that rubble. And the big companies will say they can't fail, or grumble, grumble national security.

    gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

      we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

      but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

      so what do you envision this might be?

      for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

      bfelix@burnthis.townB This user is from outside of this forum
      bfelix@burnthis.townB This user is from outside of this forum
      bfelix@burnthis.town
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @davidgerard yeah, makes sense. Can't hire that much people back when you've gambled away all you money.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

        we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

        but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

        so what do you envision this might be?

        for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

        pettter@social.accum.seP This user is from outside of this forum
        pettter@social.accum.seP This user is from outside of this forum
        pettter@social.accum.se
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @davidgerard Realistically, it'll depend a whole lot on whether and to what extent a worker's movement will take power and remove/counteract billionaire and asset manager financially accumulative tendencies. It's not exactly rocket science to see what kinds of changes and investments need to be done to improve society, and while it does require expertise to effect those changes, that expertise is generally speaking available to some extent.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

          we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

          but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

          so what do you envision this might be?

          for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

          huronbikes@cyberplace.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          huronbikes@cyberplace.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          huronbikes@cyberplace.social
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @davidgerard outsourcing, because it went so great the last dozen or so times.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • audunmb@todon.nlA audunmb@todon.nl

            @davidgerard cheap Chinese replacement AI will probably be a thing. Not sure if that's the stupidest and shortest-term thing to do, but if you can't afford /access the AI you built something with, you need a substitute.

            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidgerard@circumstances.run
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @audunmb currently it's still heavily subsidised, and training is expensive so the local models will only go out of date.

            I originally thought local LLMs for coding would be what LLMs were left with after the bubble pop, but @tante pointed out they'll all quickly go out of date.

            We already see current maintained chatbot models have a habit of putting in unfavoured, obsolete and even deprecated code constructs cos that's overwhelmingly what the model was trained on.

            m@martinh.netM aaribaud@piaille.frA ysegrim@furry.engineerY 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

              we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

              but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

              so what do you envision this might be?

              for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

              btuftin@social.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
              btuftin@social.coopB This user is from outside of this forum
              btuftin@social.coop
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @davidgerard local models. It's already where LLMs make "the most sense", and I'm sure there will be a wave of hype once "Gen AI is around the corner" stops convincing investors. It'll be "streamlined Lean AI that knows Your Business and doesn't talk about goblins!".

              davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

                but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

                so what do you envision this might be?

                for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

                rev_null@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                rev_null@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                rev_null@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @davidgerard Consulting firms will step up and offer "AI Abatement" solutions. Companies will pay $1000/hour to Accenture for a fresh grad making minimum wage. The code will end up worse.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                  @audunmb currently it's still heavily subsidised, and training is expensive so the local models will only go out of date.

                  I originally thought local LLMs for coding would be what LLMs were left with after the bubble pop, but @tante pointed out they'll all quickly go out of date.

                  We already see current maintained chatbot models have a habit of putting in unfavoured, obsolete and even deprecated code constructs cos that's overwhelmingly what the model was trained on.

                  m@martinh.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                  m@martinh.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                  m@martinh.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @davidgerard @audunmb @tante I wonder if there are any programming languages that are so obscure the ChatterBots don't know anything about them? *Breaks out the SNOBOL manual.. *

                  m@martinh.netM 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                    @audunmb currently it's still heavily subsidised, and training is expensive so the local models will only go out of date.

                    I originally thought local LLMs for coding would be what LLMs were left with after the bubble pop, but @tante pointed out they'll all quickly go out of date.

                    We already see current maintained chatbot models have a habit of putting in unfavoured, obsolete and even deprecated code constructs cos that's overwhelmingly what the model was trained on.

                    aaribaud@piaille.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aaribaud@piaille.frA This user is from outside of this forum
                    aaribaud@piaille.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @davidgerard @audunmb @tante And since the available sources for training an LLM will contain more and more of their own productions, they'll soon be entering the signal degradation phase when then more recent the data an LLM is trained on, the worse its output will be.

                    ploum@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                      we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

                      but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

                      so what do you envision this might be?

                      for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

                      katemonkey@blorbo.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      katemonkey@blorbo.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      katemonkey@blorbo.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @davidgerard Same thing they do when they need to clean up anything – hire apprentices and juniors and let them bodge everything together.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

                        but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

                        so what do you envision this might be?

                        for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

                        jack_daniel@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jack_daniel@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jack_daniel@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @davidgerard I have been telling folks that my naively optimistic take is the tech displaced will go back to work cleaning up the aftermath of AI slop. I think a massive tech collapse is more likely.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • aaribaud@piaille.frA aaribaud@piaille.fr

                          @davidgerard @audunmb @tante And since the available sources for training an LLM will contain more and more of their own productions, they'll soon be entering the signal degradation phase when then more recent the data an LLM is trained on, the worse its output will be.

                          ploum@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          ploum@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          ploum@mamot.fr
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @aaribaud @davidgerard @audunmb @tante : « eating your own shit is never healthy »

                          https://ploum.net/2022-12-05-drowning-in-ai-generated-garbage.html (written in 2022)

                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG fanden@helvede.netF 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                            we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

                            but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

                            so what do you envision this might be?

                            for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

                            paulyd@genserver.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paulyd@genserver.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paulyd@genserver.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16
                            @davidgerard My pessimistic view is that that there won't be anything they're able to do except offer platitudes and excuses. Hiring takes time, building a knowledge base takes time, etc.

                            It will be yet another example of our systems slowly breaking now and not working consistently. Well accept that sometimes things just don't work anymore, and we'll all sagely nod our heads and remember the times when we thought about trite things like longevity and reliability.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • btuftin@social.coopB btuftin@social.coop

                              @davidgerard local models. It's already where LLMs make "the most sense", and I'm sure there will be a wave of hype once "Gen AI is around the corner" stops convincing investors. It'll be "streamlined Lean AI that knows Your Business and doesn't talk about goblins!".

                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                              davidgerard@circumstances.run
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @btuftin not sure the up to date training will happen https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/116533291722823630

                              maybe we'll rebuild tech on python 2.7

                              tshirtman@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • audunmb@todon.nlA audunmb@todon.nl

                                @davidgerard cheap Chinese replacement AI will probably be a thing. Not sure if that's the stupidest and shortest-term thing to do, but if you can't afford /access the AI you built something with, you need a substitute.

                                toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                toerror@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @audunmb @davidgerard My understanding is probably crap, but don't coding models need to be not heavily quantised? Essentially, fairly memory heavy, while the cost to run is hardware plus electricity? So, unless china is able to innovate much harder, or get much cheaper electricity, I'm not sure how they'd cost less - wage arbitrage doesn't really factor into this one...

                                davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ploum@mamot.frP ploum@mamot.fr

                                  @aaribaud @davidgerard @audunmb @tante : « eating your own shit is never healthy »

                                  https://ploum.net/2022-12-05-drowning-in-ai-generated-garbage.html (written in 2022)

                                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @ploum @aaribaud @audunmb @tante see yesterday's Pivot, model collapse seems to be visibly hitting ChatGPT https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/05/06/openai-chatgpt-goes-goblin-mode-let-none-say-model-collapse/

                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • audunmb@todon.nlA audunmb@todon.nl

                                    @davidgerard cheap Chinese replacement AI will probably be a thing. Not sure if that's the stupidest and shortest-term thing to do, but if you can't afford /access the AI you built something with, you need a substitute.

                                    prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    prietschka@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    prietschka@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    @audunmb @davidgerard Nope. I mean, people will use Deepseek and Qwen and stuff, but they already are.

                                    The future is a co. fine tuning a small-ish CodeGemma or such on their codebase, and making that available to employees.

                                    It's the "good enough" policy, followed by a "no, your request for an expensive Claude subscription is denied, it's too expensive and the internal model we've made available is good enough, now get out of my office."

                                    That's the future, and should've been the present.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT toerror@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                      @audunmb @davidgerard My understanding is probably crap, but don't coding models need to be not heavily quantised? Essentially, fairly memory heavy, while the cost to run is hardware plus electricity? So, unless china is able to innovate much harder, or get much cheaper electricity, I'm not sure how they'd cost less - wage arbitrage doesn't really factor into this one...

                                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      @toerror @audunmb they have slightly cheaper electricity, yes. their chips aren't as good.

                                      toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                        we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

                                        but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

                                        so what do you envision this might be?

                                        for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

                                        dbg3d@masto.esD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dbg3d@masto.esD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dbg3d@masto.es
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        @davidgerard

                                        Umm Anyone checked if any LLM Model was trained in FreePascal? 😏

                                        tshirtman@mas.toT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                          we joke that when the AI bubble pops and the managers can't afford the chatbot any more, the surviving companies will hire the people who know how shit works to clean up

                                          but this is of course optimistic. observed behaviour is that they will instead do the stupidest and shortest-term thing they can do instead of ever doing it properly.

                                          so what do you envision this might be?

                                          for clarity, i think when the AI bubble pops, which I place as some time next year at the latest - and you can hear the screeching noises in 2026 - the current recession signs will turn into a full Great Depression 2, so those surviving companies will also be doing not so great

                                          magpieluvseeds@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          magpieluvseeds@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          magpieluvseeds@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          @davidgerard a combination of outsourcing, underpaid internships, and just pulling more work on remaining staff.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups