hm https://github.com/bluesky-social/social-app/blob/main/CLAUDE.md
-
@ryanrandall https://github.com/whyrusleeping
pretty sure not the Ruby "Why" but I don't know for sure
@cwebber @ryanrandall Nah, definitely a different Why - you can find the Ruby Why's real name and the Bluesky Why's name also appears from time to time and it's not the same name
-
I have this suspicion that the ATproto stack, at least the stuff from Bluesky, is heading towards "majority-vibecoded" but that's mostly just from seeing a lot of posts from the Bluesky eng team rather than me having spent much time in the codebase
Why is def hugely responsible for Bluesky/ATProto's design and if *he's* mostly letting Claude write 99% of his code, the rest of the eng team is likely to be heading in that direction too?
@cwebber I'm hanging out there a lot and yes there is a lot of vibecoding. However, they don't seem to vibecode more than the average paid software dev.
In 2024, I'd say about 20% of my friends vibecoded. Today the number looks more like 90%. This is not specific to atproto, my understanding is that most people vibecode nowadays.
-
Example: https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3meomclcfss2w
> Until December of last year I was using LLMs as fancy autocomplete for coding. It was nice for scaffolding out boilerplate, or giving me a gut check on some things, or banging out some boring routine stuff.
>
> In the past two months Claude has written about 99% of my code. Things are changing. Fast@cwebber things sure are changing fast. code quality for example. and the ability of developers to write or recognize good code. now the direction of change isn't great, but...
-
@cwebber I'm hanging out there a lot and yes there is a lot of vibecoding. However, they don't seem to vibecode more than the average paid software dev.
In 2024, I'd say about 20% of my friends vibecoded. Today the number looks more like 90%. This is not specific to atproto, my understanding is that most people vibecode nowadays.
@res260 Sadly a likely observation
![😕](https://board.circlewithadot.net/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f615.png?v=28325c671da ":\")
So many people just giving up on their craft.
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan it's like they didn't even like programming at all.
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan it's like they didn't even like programming at all.
@tootbrute @andymoose @cwebber at least the white #Neurotypical heterocisbinary men are...
- You know, the #McAfee - kind that only do #IT because they 'failed to the top'.
- Like a shitty parody of "Bighead" from #SiliconValley...
- You know, the #McAfee - kind that only do #IT because they 'failed to the top'.
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan I have an entire graveyard of people who are dead to me now because of this. It's unfortunate. I've lost so much respect for so many people.
-
@res260 Sadly a likely observation
So many people just giving up on their craft.
@cwebber @res260 I feel like there's always been a lot of software development that isn't craft but it's just shuffling bits around.
I don't really know how to feel about a lot of it these days. I've played around with some of the tools for work and there's certainly a lot of areas where they can write basically the same code that I would have done with less tedium, and by some metrics they do a better job (mostly things that are good practice but I couldn't be bothered).
Is that abandoning craft or careful allocation of executive function? I don't know.
I definitely think these things aren't going away. The bubble will pop, it'll maybe kill the big AI companies, people will stop shoving chat bots everywhere, but I don't see any way that LLMs don't remain a fact of life, and I don't know what the long term implications are of this -
Example: https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3meomclcfss2w
> Until December of last year I was using LLMs as fancy autocomplete for coding. It was nice for scaffolding out boilerplate, or giving me a gut check on some things, or banging out some boring routine stuff.
>
> In the past two months Claude has written about 99% of my code. Things are changing. Fast@cwebber Ah yes, LLMs are finally good now, this is probably the fourth or fifth time I've heard it and at this point it's like the boy who cried wolf, I'm not even going to bother testing out the LLMs of today to see what they get wrong, I'm just not going to believe their advocates
-
@andymoose it’s like everyone who has ever been a source of my feelings of imposter syndrome literally decided to let an imposter take the wheel
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan I have an entire graveyard of people who are dead to me now because of this. It's unfortunate. I've lost so much respect for so many people.
@theorangetheme @andymoose @cwebber I ditched enough way before that...
https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/116168104713958627 -
@theorangetheme @andymoose @cwebber I ditched enough way before that...
https://infosec.space/@kkarhan/116168104713958627@theorangetheme @andymoose @cwebber be glad you don't work for some "#AI" shill who literally thinks 'genociding the world is good, actually'...
-
I mean when I check my feed much of the Bluesky eng team seems to be posting about how great Claude is all the time so I have been background wondering how common vibecoding is in that ecosystem
are you fucking kidding? holeee shit
-
@cwebber @res260 I feel like there's always been a lot of software development that isn't craft but it's just shuffling bits around.
I don't really know how to feel about a lot of it these days. I've played around with some of the tools for work and there's certainly a lot of areas where they can write basically the same code that I would have done with less tedium, and by some metrics they do a better job (mostly things that are good practice but I couldn't be bothered).
Is that abandoning craft or careful allocation of executive function? I don't know.
I definitely think these things aren't going away. The bubble will pop, it'll maybe kill the big AI companies, people will stop shoving chat bots everywhere, but I don't see any way that LLMs don't remain a fact of life, and I don't know what the long term implications are of this@erincandescent @cwebber I agree, I think a lot of people don't consider their code craft, but maybe the final product more so
-
@erincandescent @cwebber I agree, I think a lot of people don't consider their code craft, but maybe the final product more so
-
@cwebber I found LLM generated code in vim today
-
I mean when I check my feed much of the Bluesky eng team seems to be posting about how great Claude is all the time so I have been background wondering how common vibecoding is in that ecosystem
@cwebber based on how well bsky tends to work i feel like this is likely
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan Disclaimer: I never use any LLM stuff, so I may be off base here.
I have a thought about that!
Imagine a scenario: Thanks to the layoff of developers thanks *dry tone* to the "insanely great" promise of LLM, there is now a lone developer vibecoding the main application for the company. Let's say he is doing well. But remember that he must feed a series of prompts, refining and growing the application as he progresses. Then he got a new job and left the company.
->
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan Disclaimer: I never use any LLM stuff, so I may be off base here.
I have a thought about that!
Imagine a scenario: Thanks to the layoff of developers thanks *dry tone* to the "insanely great" promise of LLM, there is now a lone developer vibecoding the main application for the company. Let's say he is doing well. But remember that he must feed a series of prompts, refining and growing the application as he progresses. Then he got a new job and left the company.
->
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan The company then got a problem: Even after hiring a new developer (or two...who knows?), they can't figure out how the code work (no real documents) and, worse, the prompts the original developer wrote is not kept. IOW there is no "source code", so to speak. Disaster eventually strikes the company as a result.
Ain't that wonderful, huh? *sarcastic tone*
Multiply that by ten thousands of this scenario across various companies and we got a real economic crisis!
END
-
@andymoose @cwebber @kkarhan The company then got a problem: Even after hiring a new developer (or two...who knows?), they can't figure out how the code work (no real documents) and, worse, the prompts the original developer wrote is not kept. IOW there is no "source code", so to speak. Disaster eventually strikes the company as a result.
Ain't that wonderful, huh? *sarcastic tone*
Multiply that by ten thousands of this scenario across various companies and we got a real economic crisis!
END
@thebluewizard @andymoose @cwebber And it's in our best interest for that to happen sooner than later so the fallout for everyone else is kept minimal...
