Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

#retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
retrocomputing
55 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

    #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

    This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

    Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

    32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

    gcvsa@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
    gcvsa@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
    gcvsa@mstdn.plus
    wrote last edited by
    #33

    @fluidlogic I got an Atari 800 with 48K RAM and 410 tape deck, plus the Star Raiders and Atari BASIC program cartridges for Christmas 1981 or 1982, can't remember, but I was 13 or 14 years old.

    My next computer was an Apple Macintosh IIsi around 1992 or 1993?

    I went to Carnegie-Mellon in 1986, so I didn't need my own computer during those years.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

      #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

      This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

      Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

      32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

      genericperson@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
      genericperson@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
      genericperson@hachyderm.io
      wrote last edited by
      #34

      @fluidlogic Vic 20, C64, C128, PC 8088/8086, Atari 1040ST

      Apple IIe if you count the computers at school.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

        #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

        This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

        Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

        32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

        argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
        argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
        wrote last edited by
        #35

        @fluidlogic

        I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

        The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

        fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF lackthereof@beige.partyL 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • silvermoon82@wandering.shopS silvermoon82@wandering.shop

          @fluidlogic
          I had an 8088 PC clone in that time, and a little later got a secondhand TI-99/4A. The PC was pretty cool, top of the line for its day with *two* floppy drives (no swapping disks for WordPerfect!) and a full 640k RAM. We upgraded it Theseus style until it was a Frankenstein 386 in the massive grey desktop case with the classic Big Red Switch.

          argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
          argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
          argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
          wrote last edited by
          #36

          @silvermoon82

          You could have upgraded it to a 486. Not a Pentium, though—Pentium motherboards were ATX and needed the case to provide a soft power button.

          As far as I know, nothing much changed after that, so you could put modern hardware in a Pentium-era case…although you might need to drill some extra vent holes in it and add some more fans!

          @fluidlogic

          lackthereof@beige.partyL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

            #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

            This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

            Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

            32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

            rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
            rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
            rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
            wrote last edited by
            #37

            @fluidlogic I worked on PDP 11s from the mid 70s to 1981 then onto Vax gear. So 16bits then 32 bits. It meant I got into 32 bits early and I wasn't interested in the PC machines. I did dabble in Windows towards the end of the 80s because a client wanted it and... only 16 bits? Are you kidding me?

            argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • wollman@mastodon.socialW wollman@mastodon.social

              @fluidlogic My mother worked for IBM so of course rather than a normal computer we had to get a 5150 (version 2 system board, so it could hold up to 256K RAM), which she paid for through payroll deduction. A few summers later I went to a "computer camp" where I was the only kid with a PC in a sea of TRS-80s and C-64s and Apple IIs. It was upgraded over time; the second floppy drive broke and was replaced with a 20M hard drive, and we got a better (non-Epson) printer and a color monitor.

              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
              wrote last edited by
              #38

              @wollman

              Did you replace the system board at any point? As far as I know, the 5150 BIOS doesn't know how to boot from a hard drive.

              @fluidlogic

              wollman@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

                @fluidlogic I worked on PDP 11s from the mid 70s to 1981 then onto Vax gear. So 16bits then 32 bits. It meant I got into 32 bits early and I wasn't interested in the PC machines. I did dabble in Windows towards the end of the 80s because a client wanted it and... only 16 bits? Are you kidding me?

                argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                wrote last edited by
                #39

                @rogerparkinson

                Windows 2.1 and later aren't entirely 16-bit. Apps run in real mode and use 20-bit segmented addressing, but if it's running on a 386 or later then the kernel will run 32-bit and map pages in and out of the 20-bit address space in response to GlobalLock calls.

                But you'd have to wait until 1993 to get a Windows in which apps can directly use 32-bit addressing. That's when NT 3.1 and Win32s (a shim to run 32-bit code on regular Windows 3.1) came out.

                @fluidlogic

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                  argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                  argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #40

                  @Su_G

                  You did miss out. It was an exciting time.

                  @fluidlogic

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                    @wollman

                    Did you replace the system board at any point? As far as I know, the 5150 BIOS doesn't know how to boot from a hard drive.

                    @fluidlogic

                    wollman@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wollman@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                    wollman@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #41

                    @fluidlogic @argv_minus_one The controller had an option ROM.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                      @silvermoon82

                      You could have upgraded it to a 486. Not a Pentium, though—Pentium motherboards were ATX and needed the case to provide a soft power button.

                      As far as I know, nothing much changed after that, so you could put modern hardware in a Pentium-era case…although you might need to drill some extra vent holes in it and add some more fans!

                      @fluidlogic

                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lackthereof@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #42

                      @argv_minus_one @silvermoon82

                      No, lots of the early socket 5 pentium motherboards were plain-AT, it wasn't until the later ones, with socket 7 and SDRAM, that they started adopting ATX. Mostly because it meant they could get 3.3v directly from the psu instead of needing a regulator on the mobo.

                      I had a gateway 2000 100mhz pentium with a big clonky power button and big hot 3.3v regulators on the motherboard.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                        @quinn it's more of a mix than I expected!

                        (I had guessed just 10% of retrocomputing folk didn't, when they were first released, have access to the machines that are currently their retrocomputers of choice. The poll indicates right now it's over 20%, which I find encouraging, as it indicates there's a sizeable chunk for whom retrocomputing is not about nostalgia primarily.)

                        geraldew@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                        geraldew@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
                        geraldew@fosstodon.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #43

                        @fluidlogic @quinn maybe more of a mix than you might guess.

                        I'm not active in any "retro" sense, but I did work for an 8-bit maker in the 1980s - as well as having the same gear personally.

                        Which means I don't have a rosy nostalgia and instead remember how flaky the hardware was, how scant the documentation was, how few were our ways to get answers - etc.

                        But what I am grateful for in retrospect, is how understandable those systems were. So much of what I learned then, still guides me.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                          #retrocomputing folks: I'm trying to get a sense of the proportion of people here who are into a given class of retrocomputer today but didn't experience the machines when they first came on the market. I want everyone's input! Please boost!

                          This poll is about the early consumer home computers released between say 1977 and 1994.

                          Minicomputer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026497511100991

                          32-bit home/personal computer poll: https://oldbytes.space/@fluidlogic/116026605156645610

                          revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                          revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
                          revk@toot.me.uk
                          wrote last edited by
                          #44

                          @fluidlogic I could only dream of 16 bit processors 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

                            @fluidlogic I worked on PDP 11s from the mid 70s to 1981 then onto Vax gear. So 16bits then 32 bits. It meant I got into 32 bits early and I wasn't interested in the PC machines. I did dabble in Windows towards the end of the 80s because a client wanted it and... only 16 bits? Are you kidding me?

                            fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                            fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                            wrote last edited by
                            #45

                            @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

                            You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

                            rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                              @fluidlogic

                              I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

                              The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

                              fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                              wrote last edited by
                              #46

                              @argv_minus_one yes, they overlapped. In 1992, Atari released the Falcon and Commodore released the Amiga 4000.

                              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • wotsac@mastodon.socialW wotsac@mastodon.social

                                @fluidlogic there's a lot of room to carve this up. Like CP/M was mostly before my time but I got pretty into those machines when they were at once relatively almost new, but also very obsolete- and I'd argue that was retrocomputing. Similar for the TRS/80 model 2/16/6000 which could also run XENIX and verged on being minis.

                                fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                                wrote last edited by
                                #47

                                @wotsac yes "heyday" is shorthand for "the time during which a machine felt new and exciting and was productive".

                                This is not remotely a scientific poll! I have no idea if people who are answering are really current retrocomputing aficionados, for example.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF fluidlogic@oldbytes.space

                                  @rogerparkinson did you skip the 8-bitters entirely?

                                  You're a candidate for the minicomputer poll!

                                  rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR This user is from outside of this forum
                                  rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #48

                                  @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

                                  fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR rogerparkinson@mastodon.nz

                                    @fluidlogic I did skip them entirely, yes. Though I have done things with embedded 8 bit devices more recently eg ATTiny85 and Teensy.

                                    fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #49

                                    @rogerparkinson did you consider them mere toys at the time?

                                    rogerparkinson@mastodon.nzR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                                      @fluidlogic

                                      I don't think you could buy any 8- or 16-bit computers in 1994. That was well into the 32-bit era.

                                      The beginning of the end of the 16-bit era was 1986. That's when the 386 came out. It was obsolete in 1989, so that's when I'd say the 32-bit era had begun in earnest.

                                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lackthereof@beige.partyL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      lackthereof@beige.party
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #50

                                      @argv_minus_one

                                      You could definitely buy major name consumer grade 286 desktop PCs in 1990.

                                      My dad replaced our family's z80-based Heathkit with a 286-based Packard Bell on or around that year.

                                      A lot of people just didn't use Windows back then, and the extra cost of a 386 had little advantage if you weren't doing gui+multitasking.

                                      It wasn't the 386 that ushered in the end of 16 bit computing, it was windows 3.1... which could run on a 286 but was painfully restricted there.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #51

                                        @AdrianRiskin yes! Put the word out on here, using the tags #retrocomputing , #vintagecomputing , #commodorepet and optionally #losangeles and you'll get people popping up offering to take it off your hands. If you can include a snap or two, so much the better. Good luck!

                                        I suggest not putting power into it, as the chemistry-based electronics will have degraded in storage and might pop, making repair harder.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fluidlogic@oldbytes.spaceF This user is from outside of this forum
                                          fluidlogic@oldbytes.space
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #52

                                          @scuttlebutt thanks - I wasn't aware.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups