Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security.

I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
25 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • rickf@indieweb.socialR rickf@indieweb.social

    @haroonmeer @TindrasGrove

    I am so glad I’m no longer in the operational security world anymore ….. these problems are going to grow exponentially* and so will the corresponding burnout.

    * on top of the ongoing usual problems that should’ve been fixed / addressed 20 years ago but still haven’t.

    n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
    n_dimension@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #7

    @rickf @haroonmeer @TindrasGrove

    Still no use case for #Ai and apparently #LLM are useless...

    (I should start a file of these)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

      I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

      Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

      Their agents will.

      timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
      timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
      timwardcam@c.im
      wrote last edited by
      #8

      @haroonmeer I had a problem with corporate security theatre getting in the way of something I needed to do.

      So I asked the corporate provided AI how to get round the corporate security theatre.

      And instead of reporting me to security it gave me some code. (Which, in the nature of AI generated code, didn't actually work, but it did give me the clue necessary to write my own code which did work.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • webhat@infosec.exchangeW webhat@infosec.exchange

        @haroonmeer they need to add: "Don't hack stuff" to the prompt, that will protect them

        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
        raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
        wrote last edited by
        #9

        @webhat @haroonmeer
        ha ha ha
        Uninstalling the Agent is the only solution.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

          I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

          Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

          Their agents will.

          megatronicthronbanks@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          megatronicthronbanks@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          megatronicthronbanks@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #10

          @haroonmeer

          Yeah it's like Cliff Stoll and sendmail all over anew (yes I'm that old). Docker frequently writes root owned files to the FS. We are a dumb species.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

            I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

            Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

            Their agents will.

            stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            stux@mstdn.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            stux@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #11

            @haroonmeer People are willingly installing malware now, heck.. they’re even paying for it

            expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

              I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

              Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

              Their agents will.

              ahhhhhhhhhhh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahhhhhhhhhhh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              ahhhhhhhhhhh@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #12

              @haroonmeer feeling less stupid for being paranoid enough to not add my user to the docker group.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

                I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

                Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

                Their agents will.

                tdelmas@mamot.frT This user is from outside of this forum
                tdelmas@mamot.frT This user is from outside of this forum
                tdelmas@mamot.fr
                wrote last edited by
                #13

                @haroonmeer at least it didn't use the latest linux exploit

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

                  I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

                  Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

                  Their agents will.

                  cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cgudrian@social.tchncs.de
                  wrote last edited by
                  #14

                  @haroonmeer As a last resort it would have probably tried running the copyfail exploit.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stux@mstdn.socialS stux@mstdn.social

                    @haroonmeer People are willingly installing malware now, heck.. they’re even paying for it

                    expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #15

                    @stux @haroonmeer

                    And corp encourages them to do do.

                    mdione@en.osm.townM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                    • expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.social

                      @stux @haroonmeer

                      And corp encourages them to do do.

                      mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mdione@en.osm.town
                      wrote last edited by
                      #16

                      @expertenkommision_cyberunfall @stux @haroonmeer and some corps forces us to do it.

                      expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

                        I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

                        Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

                        Their agents will.

                        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdione@en.osm.town
                        wrote last edited by
                        #17

                        @haroonmeer but isn't the docker's `root` user mapped to a host's transient normal user?

                        fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mdione@en.osm.townM mdione@en.osm.town

                          @expertenkommision_cyberunfall @stux @haroonmeer and some corps forces us to do it.

                          expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                          expertenkommision_cyberunfall@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #18

                          @mdione @stux @haroonmeer

                          Feels like sabotage

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

                            I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

                            Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

                            Their agents will.

                            kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kumarvibe@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #19

                            @haroonmeer @jackeric agents are very clever. I’ve seen them try all kinds of things like this just to “get the task done.” I’ve only noticed because I put them in sandbox-exec.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mdione@en.osm.townM mdione@en.osm.town

                              @haroonmeer but isn't the docker's `root` user mapped to a host's transient normal user?

                              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #20

                              @mdione @haroonmeer Docker can map to a user other than root; but it leaves whether or not it does so up to you. I'm not sure if there's some specialty lockdown config that tightens this; but by default docker doesn't even seem to intend to protect the host from the user; and leaves it up to the user whether they want any actual protection from container contents or not.

                              Link Preview Image
                              Understanding the Docker USER Instruction | Docker

                              Discover best practices and common pitfalls associated with the Docker USER instruction. Also get a hands-on demo to learn the importance of these practices.

                              favicon

                              Docker (www.docker.com)

                              fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.social

                                @mdione @haroonmeer Docker can map to a user other than root; but it leaves whether or not it does so up to you. I'm not sure if there's some specialty lockdown config that tightens this; but by default docker doesn't even seem to intend to protect the host from the user; and leaves it up to the user whether they want any actual protection from container contents or not.

                                Link Preview Image
                                Understanding the Docker USER Instruction | Docker

                                Discover best practices and common pitfalls associated with the Docker USER instruction. Also get a hands-on demo to learn the importance of these practices.

                                favicon

                                Docker (www.docker.com)

                                fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                fuzzyfuzzyfungus@cyberplace.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #21

                                @mdione @haroonmeer Honestly, I can see the appeal of docker as a sort of web services oriented package manager; but it's terrifying to see people treating it as though it's a VM-tier isolation tool or security boundary. It's certainly not impossible to use it in ways that provide at least some protection from container contents; but the overall intent is much closer to easing dependency wrangling and keeping configs contained than to hard isolation.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

                                  I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

                                  Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

                                  Their agents will.

                                  feld@friedcheese.usF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  feld@friedcheese.usF This user is from outside of this forum
                                  feld@friedcheese.us
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #22
                                  @haroonmeer why are we so worried about agents using this when this was already the first thing any attacker would do?

                                  Pop a shell on Linux, check for docker group access. That makes life very easy.
                                  phnt@fluffytail.orgP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • feld@friedcheese.usF feld@friedcheese.us
                                    @haroonmeer why are we so worried about agents using this when this was already the first thing any attacker would do?

                                    Pop a shell on Linux, check for docker group access. That makes life very easy.
                                    phnt@fluffytail.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    phnt@fluffytail.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    phnt@fluffytail.org
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #23
                                    @feld @haroonmeer Why are we so worried about agents using this when the user had the rights in the first place? Agents/LLMs should change nothing in that equation.
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • haroonmeer@infosec.exchangeH haroonmeer@infosec.exchange

                                      I’ve mentioned this before: this is one of the oncoming trains for corp-security. We’ve long failed at least-privilege, but weren’t often punished for it.

                                      Helen in HR (or Bob in accounts) didn’t know what to do with the extra perms they didn’t know they had.

                                      Their agents will.

                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                                      shadur@mastodon.sandwich.net
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @haroonmeer Will this still work if docker is not run as root but as an unprivileged user?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      0
                                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                      • webhat@infosec.exchangeW webhat@infosec.exchange

                                        @haroonmeer they need to add: "Don't hack stuff" to the prompt, that will protect them

                                        aj@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aj@techhub.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        aj@techhub.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #25

                                        @webhat @haroonmeer also add: "don't say anything about goblins"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        0
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups