Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. No matter what lawmakers claim, surveillance of encrypted communications is fundamentally a systemic vulnerability.

No matter what lawmakers claim, surveillance of encrypted communications is fundamentally a systemic vulnerability.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • eff@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    eff@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    eff@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    No matter what lawmakers claim, surveillance of encrypted communications is fundamentally a systemic vulnerability. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/canadas-bill-c-22-repackaged-version-last-years-surveillance-nightmare

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    0
    • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
      R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
    • eff@mastodon.socialE eff@mastodon.social

      No matter what lawmakers claim, surveillance of encrypted communications is fundamentally a systemic vulnerability. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/05/canadas-bill-c-22-repackaged-version-last-years-surveillance-nightmare

      W This user is from outside of this forum
      W This user is from outside of this forum
      woo@fosstodon.org
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @eff Before 1984: "There's no reason to fear government listening equipment in your home unless you are doing something wrong." (Source unknown but probably Amazon or Google.)

      After 1984: "I'm afraid that a rat might eat my face if I express independent thoughts."

      abt1181@ioc.exchangeA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W woo@fosstodon.org

        @eff Before 1984: "There's no reason to fear government listening equipment in your home unless you are doing something wrong." (Source unknown but probably Amazon or Google.)

        After 1984: "I'm afraid that a rat might eat my face if I express independent thoughts."

        abt1181@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
        abt1181@ioc.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
        abt1181@ioc.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @woo @eff Even if I am discussing something "wrong" or "illegal", those terms are only relative to the law of your government and not actual morality. I refuse to fucking suck the dick of the state and law lol and will discuss with my partner and friends whatever I want lol

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups