Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. New blog post: "Forbidding generative AI and LLMs on Pepper&Carrot"https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1129/forbidding-generative-ai-and-llms-on-peppercarrot

New blog post: "Forbidding generative AI and LLMs on Pepper&Carrot"https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1129/forbidding-generative-ai-and-llms-on-peppercarrot

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
51 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

    @kimcrawley Ok, I think we just have a problem of definition here. I'm just talking about the coding method, the small neural networks home made for Character Recognition for scanner, built on a limited dataset of scans (with autorisation); or a filter that auto clean line-art, like on this paper https://www.davidrevoy.com/article642/scientific-paper-sketch-to-line-art-by-waseda-university I participated in 2018. Yes, things that existed before 2022.

    I think we agree on all gen AI from surveillance capitalism by corpo. No need to jump on the big words or insults.

    davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @kimcrawley Also, I concede my wording on my FAQ (that's probably was written around 2022/2023) could be better and more precise. I'll note on my TODO to try to disambiguate this as much as possible.

    Edit: updated with an 'addendum': https://www.davidrevoy.com/static2/about-me

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @mangeurdenuage Cette présentation n'apporte rien de concret dans les usages pratique: juste un objet théorique avec des critères pas mis en application... la FSF quoi.

      J'invoque avec ce genre de règle catégorique et simple une protection contre des usages déjà là. Ca donne au projet un motif de ban ou d'avertissement pour bannir les MR d'un agent Claude/Copilot/Mistral/Llama à vue, ou gronder un bleu qui penserait qu'on pourrait vibe-coder un truc pour le site et le soumettre.
      (1/2)

      davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

        @mangeurdenuage Cette présentation n'apporte rien de concret dans les usages pratique: juste un objet théorique avec des critères pas mis en application... la FSF quoi.

        J'invoque avec ce genre de règle catégorique et simple une protection contre des usages déjà là. Ca donne au projet un motif de ban ou d'avertissement pour bannir les MR d'un agent Claude/Copilot/Mistral/Llama à vue, ou gronder un bleu qui penserait qu'on pourrait vibe-coder un truc pour le site et le soumettre.
        (1/2)

        davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
        davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @mangeurdenuage Ensuite, si vient un jour l'objet théorique de la FSF, genre le truc génial, fiable, pas privateur, etc... et que c'est utilisé dans tout les FLOSS, hè bien on verra peut-être à bâtir des exceptions... Mais on en reparle dans 10 ans à mon avis 🤣 . (2/2)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

          New blog post: "Forbidding generative AI and LLMs on Pepper&Carrot"
          https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1129/forbidding-generative-ai-and-llms-on-peppercarrot

          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
          raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @davidrevoy
          I love Pepper & Carrot* and also your Avian Intellegence series.

          [* Though I've not read much of it]

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • aloxe@mast.eu.orgA aloxe@mast.eu.org

            @davidrevoy ça me fait trop penser à Kaonashi dans Spirited away. Ce personnage est d'ailleurs une belle image des LLM actuels, qui bouffent tout et tout le monde mais fascinent tant.

            davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
            davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @aloxe Oui, une grosse grosse inspiration, un mix entre ça et le sans visage. 💜

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

              @kimcrawley Ok, I think we just have a problem of definition here. I'm just talking about the coding method, the small neural networks home made for Character Recognition for scanner, built on a limited dataset of scans (with autorisation); or a filter that auto clean line-art, like on this paper https://www.davidrevoy.com/article642/scientific-paper-sketch-to-line-art-by-waseda-university I participated in 2018. Yes, things that existed before 2022.

              I think we agree on all gen AI from surveillance capitalism by corpo. No need to jump on the big words or insults.

              kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
              kwazekwaze@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @davidrevoy @kimcrawley
              David, the conflation of working, innocuous computational methods such as what you describe here with the exploitive and theft-based methods of the last few years was intentional.

              The use of this conflation to illicit otherwise well-meaning individuals to equivocate over "good" and "bad" AI is a well-known tactic for bogging down criticism.

              It's not exactly just two people having a difference in definitions.

              kimcrawley@zeroes.caK kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK kwazekwaze@mastodon.social

                @davidrevoy @kimcrawley
                David, the conflation of working, innocuous computational methods such as what you describe here with the exploitive and theft-based methods of the last few years was intentional.

                The use of this conflation to illicit otherwise well-meaning individuals to equivocate over "good" and "bad" AI is a well-known tactic for bogging down criticism.

                It's not exactly just two people having a difference in definitions.

                kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                kimcrawley@zeroes.ca
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @kwazekwaze @davidrevoy

                ❤️

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK kwazekwaze@mastodon.social

                  @davidrevoy @kimcrawley
                  David, the conflation of working, innocuous computational methods such as what you describe here with the exploitive and theft-based methods of the last few years was intentional.

                  The use of this conflation to illicit otherwise well-meaning individuals to equivocate over "good" and "bad" AI is a well-known tactic for bogging down criticism.

                  It's not exactly just two people having a difference in definitions.

                  kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kwazekwaze@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @davidrevoy @kimcrawley The question to ask is who are you trying to appeal to when you say you're "not against all AI"?

                  Are you worried someone reading post-2023 is going to somehow think you're referring to some predictive algorithm in use in hospitals 2016?

                  Anyone with even a vague knowledge of AI is going to know you're not, anyone that doesn't isn't going to even know to think that as "AI" to them means the shit we're all disparaging!

                  davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD kimcrawley@zeroes.caK 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK kwazekwaze@mastodon.social

                    @davidrevoy @kimcrawley The question to ask is who are you trying to appeal to when you say you're "not against all AI"?

                    Are you worried someone reading post-2023 is going to somehow think you're referring to some predictive algorithm in use in hospitals 2016?

                    Anyone with even a vague knowledge of AI is going to know you're not, anyone that doesn't isn't going to even know to think that as "AI" to them means the shit we're all disparaging!

                    davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @kwazekwaze @kimcrawley ? I'm not trying to appeal others with my ideas on the topic, I just say what I think and do, unfiltred. I'm an independent artist with a comic project, not a doing PR strategy. 🤣

                    Also, FIY, in Free Libre and Open Source gfx, we have a library part of GMIC like nn_lib ( see 5.2 in https://gmic.eu/gmic325/ ), that is "neural network learning". It use small, ethical dataset. It's for making better filters, it runs local, etc... The nuance is for that type of projects.

                    kimcrawley@zeroes.caK kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

                      New blog post: "Forbidding generative AI and LLMs on Pepper&Carrot"
                      https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1129/forbidding-generative-ai-and-llms-on-peppercarrot

                      stem@framapiaf.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stem@framapiaf.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      stem@framapiaf.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @davidrevoy I think you should like this song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsQtUSTSX40

                      davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • stem@framapiaf.orgS stem@framapiaf.org

                        @davidrevoy I think you should like this song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CsQtUSTSX40

                        davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        @Stem great one!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                          davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @mangeurdenuage T'inquiète, pas de mal, et de toute façon, j'ai un peu/beaucoup d’amertume avec la FSF. Mon avis sur ce qu'il font maintenant ne vaux pas grand choses car je tourne vite fait sois à la moquerie, soit à d'autre stratégie d'évitement. Mea Culpa.

                          En tout cas, c'est chouette de voir Zoë Kooyman, ce fût de loin celle que j'ai le plus apprécié travaillé avec l'hors de notre collab.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

                            New blog post: "Forbidding generative AI and LLMs on Pepper&Carrot"
                            https://www.davidrevoy.com/article1129/forbidding-generative-ai-and-llms-on-peppercarrot

                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            M This user is from outside of this forum
                            michkov@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #34

                            @davidrevoy Armus?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK kwazekwaze@mastodon.social

                              @davidrevoy @kimcrawley The question to ask is who are you trying to appeal to when you say you're "not against all AI"?

                              Are you worried someone reading post-2023 is going to somehow think you're referring to some predictive algorithm in use in hospitals 2016?

                              Anyone with even a vague knowledge of AI is going to know you're not, anyone that doesn't isn't going to even know to think that as "AI" to them means the shit we're all disparaging!

                              kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kimcrawley@zeroes.ca
                              wrote last edited by
                              #35

                              @kwazekwaze @davidrevoy
                              ❤️

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

                                @kwazekwaze @kimcrawley ? I'm not trying to appeal others with my ideas on the topic, I just say what I think and do, unfiltred. I'm an independent artist with a comic project, not a doing PR strategy. 🤣

                                Also, FIY, in Free Libre and Open Source gfx, we have a library part of GMIC like nn_lib ( see 5.2 in https://gmic.eu/gmic325/ ), that is "neural network learning". It use small, ethical dataset. It's for making better filters, it runs local, etc... The nuance is for that type of projects.

                                kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                                kimcrawley@zeroes.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #36

                                @davidrevoy @kwazekwaze

                                You're trying to appeal to centrism fallacy. "I'm not one of those radicals who is totally against bad thing, I am partly supportive of bad thing, to be rational and sensible!

                                The planet can have a little destruction, as a treat!

                                I don't like to get all *political*. So when bad thing is destroying the world, instead of being on the right side of history and firmly opposing bad thing, I'm gonna not get involved and just let bad thing hurt people 'cuz it's just politics, you know?

                                Don't confuse me for someone with principles and a strong moral code!" 😂🤣😂🤣

                                davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • kimcrawley@zeroes.caK kimcrawley@zeroes.ca

                                  @davidrevoy @kwazekwaze

                                  You're trying to appeal to centrism fallacy. "I'm not one of those radicals who is totally against bad thing, I am partly supportive of bad thing, to be rational and sensible!

                                  The planet can have a little destruction, as a treat!

                                  I don't like to get all *political*. So when bad thing is destroying the world, instead of being on the right side of history and firmly opposing bad thing, I'm gonna not get involved and just let bad thing hurt people 'cuz it's just politics, you know?

                                  Don't confuse me for someone with principles and a strong moral code!" 😂🤣😂🤣

                                  davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davidrevoy@framapiaf.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @kimcrawley @kwazekwaze Oh, a Straw man. Ok, discussion is over.

                                  kimcrawley@zeroes.caK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

                                    @kimcrawley @kwazekwaze Oh, a Straw man. Ok, discussion is over.

                                    kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    kimcrawley@zeroes.ca
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @davidrevoy @kwazekwaze

                                    I see no "straw men" here, only a coward who refuses to take a strong moral stance. The planet destroying torment nexus and the technofascists who love it aren't going to give you a cookie as you watch the planet burn and shrug about how you don't care.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • kimcrawley@zeroes.caK kimcrawley@zeroes.ca

                                      @davidrevoy

                                      David, I thought you were really cool. But it turns out you're not really against Gen AI after all.

                                      yuki2501@masto.hackers.townY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      yuki2501@masto.hackers.townY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      yuki2501@masto.hackers.town
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @kimcrawley @davidrevoy Ethical AI is a thing. (See, for example, Neuro-sama)

                                      Clearly what we're against is AI slop and blatant plagiarizing of artists' works. (Not to mention massive data centers poisoning the land, but that's a different topic)

                                      So far nothing good has come from AI provided by megacorps like OpenAI. See also: Capitalism.

                                      kimcrawley@zeroes.caK 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • yuki2501@masto.hackers.townY yuki2501@masto.hackers.town

                                        @kimcrawley @davidrevoy Ethical AI is a thing. (See, for example, Neuro-sama)

                                        Clearly what we're against is AI slop and blatant plagiarizing of artists' works. (Not to mention massive data centers poisoning the land, but that's a different topic)

                                        So far nothing good has come from AI provided by megacorps like OpenAI. See also: Capitalism.

                                        kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kimcrawley@zeroes.caK This user is from outside of this forum
                                        kimcrawley@zeroes.ca
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @yuki2501 @davidrevoy

                                        There is no non-evil Gen AI.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davidrevoy@framapiaf.orgD davidrevoy@framapiaf.org

                                          @kwazekwaze @kimcrawley ? I'm not trying to appeal others with my ideas on the topic, I just say what I think and do, unfiltred. I'm an independent artist with a comic project, not a doing PR strategy. 🤣

                                          Also, FIY, in Free Libre and Open Source gfx, we have a library part of GMIC like nn_lib ( see 5.2 in https://gmic.eu/gmic325/ ), that is "neural network learning". It use small, ethical dataset. It's for making better filters, it runs local, etc... The nuance is for that type of projects.

                                          kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kwazekwaze@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kwazekwaze@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          @davidrevoy @kimcrawley Yeah man, I know. The "well-meaning individuals" part was referring to you! I ain't accusing you of malignance.

                                          Try this: Imagine a world where half the critical articles about bitcoin had the author ending with "now don't get me wrong I'm not actually opposed to all crypto. SHA-256 and SSH are actually super useful technologies".

                                          A little weird, right?

                                          kimcrawley@zeroes.caK 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups