Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The class solidarity argument has been a part of “AI” discourse in many fields for a while now.

The class solidarity argument has been a part of “AI” discourse in many fields for a while now.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
11 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • baldur@toot.cafeB baldur@toot.cafe

    The class solidarity argument has been a part of “AI” discourse in many fields for a while now. It doesn’t settle the debate but it’s a rationale many will acknowledge even if they disagree

    Except in coding. Mention it to software devs and most will look at you as if you just spoke in tongues

    baldur@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
    baldur@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
    baldur@toot.cafe
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    This is a long-standing characteristic of the field and it explains a lot of what’s been going on in tech. If you can’t even empathise with people doing the same job as you—that share your circumstances—what are the chances of you caring about the end user or the effects of your work on society?

    geraldew@fosstodon.orgG abucci@buc.ciA mrg@mastodon.sdf.orgM 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • baldur@toot.cafeB baldur@toot.cafe

      The class solidarity argument has been a part of “AI” discourse in many fields for a while now. It doesn’t settle the debate but it’s a rationale many will acknowledge even if they disagree

      Except in coding. Mention it to software devs and most will look at you as if you just spoke in tongues

      ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
      ainmosni@social.ainmosni.euA This user is from outside of this forum
      ainmosni@social.ainmosni.eu
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @baldur Agreed, although I'm not sure about "most", I think this is very bubble specific. Some bubbles of devs will fully understand and agree, and others will defend their sycophantic "assistant" until the end of the earth.

      That said, there's definitely an empathy problem in the industry, coming from us being pitted against each other, and discouraged from unionising, by the above average wages we historically got. Making it a very "got mine, fuck you" industry, that is now speedrunning the consequences of that attitude.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • baldur@toot.cafeB baldur@toot.cafe

        This is a long-standing characteristic of the field and it explains a lot of what’s been going on in tech. If you can’t even empathise with people doing the same job as you—that share your circumstances—what are the chances of you caring about the end user or the effects of your work on society?

        geraldew@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
        geraldew@fosstodon.orgG This user is from outside of this forum
        geraldew@fosstodon.org
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @baldur sorry to nitpick, but by "emphasise" did you perhaps mean "empathise"?

        baldur@toot.cafeB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • baldur@toot.cafeB baldur@toot.cafe

          This is a long-standing characteristic of the field and it explains a lot of what’s been going on in tech. If you can’t even empathise with people doing the same job as you—that share your circumstances—what are the chances of you caring about the end user or the effects of your work on society?

          abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
          abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
          abucci@buc.ci
          wrote last edited by
          #5
          @baldur@toot.cafe I listened to an interview with Robert Dorschel, the author of this book, and found it illuminating: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-social-codes-of-tech-workers-a-contradictory-middle-class-in-the-making-robert-dorschel/b207a34d1660255b

          The Social Codes of Tech Workers
          The book identifies tech workers as a contradictory class formation, oscillating between a spirit of emancipation and yet another spirit of capitalism.
          The oscillation is a degree of freedom allowing tech workers to take up or avoid solidarity-oriented perspectives as convenient. There's lots of space for bad actors.
          baldur@toot.cafeB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • geraldew@fosstodon.orgG geraldew@fosstodon.org

            @baldur sorry to nitpick, but by "emphasise" did you perhaps mean "empathise"?

            baldur@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
            baldur@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
            baldur@toot.cafe
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @geraldew Thanks! Edited. 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • abucci@buc.ciA abucci@buc.ci
              @baldur@toot.cafe I listened to an interview with Robert Dorschel, the author of this book, and found it illuminating: https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-social-codes-of-tech-workers-a-contradictory-middle-class-in-the-making-robert-dorschel/b207a34d1660255b

              The Social Codes of Tech Workers
              The book identifies tech workers as a contradictory class formation, oscillating between a spirit of emancipation and yet another spirit of capitalism.
              The oscillation is a degree of freedom allowing tech workers to take up or avoid solidarity-oriented perspectives as convenient. There's lots of space for bad actors.
              baldur@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
              baldur@toot.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
              baldur@toot.cafe
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @abucci That’s interesting, thanks. I hadn’t come across that book before.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • baldur@toot.cafeB baldur@toot.cafe

                The class solidarity argument has been a part of “AI” discourse in many fields for a while now. It doesn’t settle the debate but it’s a rationale many will acknowledge even if they disagree

                Except in coding. Mention it to software devs and most will look at you as if you just spoke in tongues

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                slotos@toot.community
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @baldur Game devs seem to be breaking that mold. But yeah, I mentioned unions on a meetup once, it didn’t go well.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
                  abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
                  abucci@buc.ci
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9
                  @iain@kolektiva.social @baldur@toot.cafe Ugh, yes. It's slightly less expensive at MIT Press, but still pricey. I wish these academic books were more accessible. It's possible your library has it or could be convinced to order it.
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
                    abucci@buc.ciA This user is from outside of this forum
                    abucci@buc.ci
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10
                    @iain@kolektiva.social @baldur@toot.cafe I forgot to share the interview, which is free (modulo some skippable ads): https://newbooksnetwork.com/the-social-codes-of-tech-workers

                    You can get a decent sense of what he's arguing in the book from this interview.
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • baldur@toot.cafeB baldur@toot.cafe

                      This is a long-standing characteristic of the field and it explains a lot of what’s been going on in tech. If you can’t even empathise with people doing the same job as you—that share your circumstances—what are the chances of you caring about the end user or the effects of your work on society?

                      mrg@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mrg@mastodon.sdf.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mrg@mastodon.sdf.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @baldur I'm reading Scott's "Seeing Like a State" and the chapter on the agricultural collectivisation after the Russian revolution made me think about how Lenins attitude towards the peasants are similar to many software architects' attitudes towards users (and developers for that matter).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups