Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmsiliconsampling
80 Posts 64 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • aadeacon@mastodon.socialA aadeacon@mastodon.social

    @rapsneezy @Natasha_Jay Do not give the GOP ideas...Please

    rapsneezy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    rapsneezy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    rapsneezy@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @aadeacon @Natasha_Jay

    on the other hand, the rest of the world might gain some relief from a US Empire that is busy shooting itself in the foot

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

      I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

      #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

      unlofl@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
      unlofl@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
      unlofl@mstdn.social
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @Natasha_Jay Oh my god they're reporting Kalshi markets like polling data how could this get any worse?

      ... ok, this is worse.

      coolcalmcollected@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

        I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

        #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
        david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        @Natasha_Jay

        On the surface, I can see why people would understand the idea behind this, and it wouldn’t be completely nonsense if the training data for LLMs were representative. But there are so many reasons why their axiom is flawed.

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

          I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

          #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

          guigsy@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          guigsy@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          guigsy@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          @Natasha_Jay because LLMs never make up shit, confuse unrelated subjects or hallucinate! Wow.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

            I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

            #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

            matt@istheguy.comM This user is from outside of this forum
            matt@istheguy.comM This user is from outside of this forum
            matt@istheguy.com
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @Natasha_Jay

            simple and tantalizing

            ctrl-w

            ctrl-q

            poweroff

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

              I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

              #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

              kern@hol.ogra.phK This user is from outside of this forum
              kern@hol.ogra.phK This user is from outside of this forum
              kern@hol.ogra.ph
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt oh no no

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                mook@possum.cityM This user is from outside of this forum
                mook@possum.cityM This user is from outside of this forum
                mook@possum.city
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt axios is basically an arm of the US state dept at this point, notice how they're getting some much exclusive coverage from the white house

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                  I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                  #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                  mnspy@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mnspy@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mnspy@mastodon.online
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @Natasha_Jay

                  WTAF

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                    I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                    #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                    knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    knutson_brain@sfba.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @Natasha_Jay
                    “…no people were involved in the creation of these opinions…” 🤦‍♂️

                    doctormo@floss.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    0
                    • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                      I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                      #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                      lemonlolita@calckey.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lemonlolita@calckey.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lemonlolita@calckey.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt
                      If you ever wondered how polling could be less useful, reliable ...

                      zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • unlofl@mstdn.socialU unlofl@mstdn.social

                        @Natasha_Jay Oh my god they're reporting Kalshi markets like polling data how could this get any worse?

                        ... ok, this is worse.

                        coolcalmcollected@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        coolcalmcollected@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        coolcalmcollected@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @unlofl @Natasha_Jay

                        "how can it be worse?" is the same incantation as "what could possibly go wrong?"

                        and as we all know, incantations can only lead to tears

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                          I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                          #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                          bshn@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bshn@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                          bshn@hachyderm.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #38

                          @Natasha_Jay it is unbelievable how some people can come up with such business ideas!
                          1. Buy one pricey GPU
                          2. Establish "polling company" entity
                          3. Collect orders, run simulations, earn bucks

                          🤣

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                            @Natasha_Jay

                            On the surface, I can see why people would understand the idea behind this, and it wouldn’t be completely nonsense if the training data for LLMs were representative. But there are so many reasons why their axiom is flawed.

                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            nothacking@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39
                            @david_chisnall @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt

                            ... and LLMs are intentionally skewed to be "helpful" and not praise Hitler.

                            It turns out the average internet comment is rather nasty and people don't want that. The average internet user is probobly quite a bit better, but LLMs are trained on text, not people.
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • knutson_brain@sfba.socialK knutson_brain@sfba.social

                              @Natasha_Jay
                              “…no people were involved in the creation of these opinions…” 🤦‍♂️

                              doctormo@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              doctormo@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              doctormo@floss.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              @knutson_brain @Natasha_Jay

                              That's got to be a book title in the future, right?

                              knutson_brain@sfba.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                                I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                                #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                                ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostrunner@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #41

                                @Natasha_Jay this DESPITE the foundational study's Conclusion that it is inaccurate.

                                https://openaccess-api.cms-conferences.org/articles/download/978-1-964867-73-1_45

                                Link Preview Image
                                natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                                  I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                                  #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                                  nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nilz@norden.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #42

                                  @Natasha_Jay

                                  Is this SIMULACRON-3 ??

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • doctormo@floss.socialD doctormo@floss.social

                                    @knutson_brain @Natasha_Jay

                                    That's got to be a book title in the future, right?

                                    knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    knutson_brain@sfba.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #43

                                    @doctormo hmm… 🤔

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG ghostrunner@hachyderm.io

                                      @Natasha_Jay this DESPITE the foundational study's Conclusion that it is inaccurate.

                                      https://openaccess-api.cms-conferences.org/articles/download/978-1-964867-73-1_45

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      natasha_jay@tech.lgbt
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #44

                                      @ghostrunner
                                      Why am I not surprised? 🙄

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                                        I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                                        #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        S This user is from outside of this forum
                                        slotos@toot.community
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #45

                                        @Natasha_Jay Are we automating Goodheart’s law now?

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • robo105@mastodon.socialR robo105@mastodon.social

                                          @Natasha_Jay Silicone sampling tells us what AI wants us to believe but nothing about humans. It probably makes money so it will be a growing concern

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          slotos@toot.community
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #46

                                          @Robo105 @Natasha_Jay Correction, “what people that trained AI models think others should believe”.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups