Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
llmsiliconsampling
80 Posts 64 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

    I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

    #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    gainfullydozy@mastodon.online
    wrote last edited by
    #26

    @Natasha_Jay So they'll assemble these "models" from essentially "fossilized" pre-slop human-generated data, fold in reams of more recent gen-AI-slop, cram that all into black boxes owned and run by sociopathic billionaires, and use the output to make major decisions affecting the lives of millions/billions?

    Seems fine, what could POSSIBLY immediately and irrevocably go wrong for almost all of us?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aadeacon@mastodon.socialA aadeacon@mastodon.social

      @rapsneezy @Natasha_Jay Do not give the GOP ideas...Please

      rapsneezy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rapsneezy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      rapsneezy@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #27

      @aadeacon @Natasha_Jay

      on the other hand, the rest of the world might gain some relief from a US Empire that is busy shooting itself in the foot

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

        I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

        #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

        unlofl@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        unlofl@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
        unlofl@mstdn.social
        wrote last edited by
        #28

        @Natasha_Jay Oh my god they're reporting Kalshi markets like polling data how could this get any worse?

        ... ok, this is worse.

        coolcalmcollected@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

          I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

          #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

          david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #29

          @Natasha_Jay

          On the surface, I can see why people would understand the idea behind this, and it wouldn’t be completely nonsense if the training data for LLMs were representative. But there are so many reasons why their axiom is flawed.

          N 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

            I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

            #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

            guigsy@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            guigsy@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            guigsy@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #30

            @Natasha_Jay because LLMs never make up shit, confuse unrelated subjects or hallucinate! Wow.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

              I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

              #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

              matt@istheguy.comM This user is from outside of this forum
              matt@istheguy.comM This user is from outside of this forum
              matt@istheguy.com
              wrote last edited by
              #31

              @Natasha_Jay

              simple and tantalizing

              ctrl-w

              ctrl-q

              poweroff

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                kern@hol.ogra.phK This user is from outside of this forum
                kern@hol.ogra.phK This user is from outside of this forum
                kern@hol.ogra.ph
                wrote last edited by
                #32

                @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt oh no no

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                  I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                  #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                  mook@possum.cityM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mook@possum.cityM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mook@possum.city
                  wrote last edited by
                  #33

                  @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt axios is basically an arm of the US state dept at this point, notice how they're getting some much exclusive coverage from the white house

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                    I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                    #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                    mnspy@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mnspy@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mnspy@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #34

                    @Natasha_Jay

                    WTAF

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                      I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                      #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                      knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                      knutson_brain@sfba.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #35

                      @Natasha_Jay
                      “…no people were involved in the creation of these opinions…” 🤦‍♂️

                      doctormo@floss.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      0
                      • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                        I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                        #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                        lemonlolita@calckey.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lemonlolita@calckey.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                        lemonlolita@calckey.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #36

                        @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt
                        If you ever wondered how polling could be less useful, reliable ...

                        zer0unplanned@friendica.rogueproject.orgZ 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • unlofl@mstdn.socialU unlofl@mstdn.social

                          @Natasha_Jay Oh my god they're reporting Kalshi markets like polling data how could this get any worse?

                          ... ok, this is worse.

                          coolcalmcollected@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          coolcalmcollected@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          coolcalmcollected@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #37

                          @unlofl @Natasha_Jay

                          "how can it be worse?" is the same incantation as "what could possibly go wrong?"

                          and as we all know, incantations can only lead to tears

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                            I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                            #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                            bshn@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bshn@hachyderm.ioB This user is from outside of this forum
                            bshn@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #38

                            @Natasha_Jay it is unbelievable how some people can come up with such business ideas!
                            1. Buy one pricey GPU
                            2. Establish "polling company" entity
                            3. Collect orders, run simulations, earn bucks

                            🤣

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                              @Natasha_Jay

                              On the surface, I can see why people would understand the idea behind this, and it wouldn’t be completely nonsense if the training data for LLMs were representative. But there are so many reasons why their axiom is flawed.

                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              nothacking@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #39
                              @david_chisnall @Natasha_Jay@tech.lgbt

                              ... and LLMs are intentionally skewed to be "helpful" and not praise Hitler.

                              It turns out the average internet comment is rather nasty and people don't want that. The average internet user is probobly quite a bit better, but LLMs are trained on text, not people.
                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • knutson_brain@sfba.socialK knutson_brain@sfba.social

                                @Natasha_Jay
                                “…no people were involved in the creation of these opinions…” 🤦‍♂️

                                doctormo@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                doctormo@floss.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                doctormo@floss.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #40

                                @knutson_brain @Natasha_Jay

                                That's got to be a book title in the future, right?

                                knutson_brain@sfba.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                                  I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                                  #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                                  ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghostrunner@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #41

                                  @Natasha_Jay this DESPITE the foundational study's Conclusion that it is inaccurate.

                                  https://openaccess-api.cms-conferences.org/articles/download/978-1-964867-73-1_45

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                                    I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                                    #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                                    nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                    nilz@norden.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #42

                                    @Natasha_Jay

                                    Is this SIMULACRON-3 ??

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • doctormo@floss.socialD doctormo@floss.social

                                      @knutson_brain @Natasha_Jay

                                      That's got to be a book title in the future, right?

                                      knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      knutson_brain@sfba.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      knutson_brain@sfba.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #43

                                      @doctormo hmm… 🤔

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ghostrunner@hachyderm.ioG ghostrunner@hachyderm.io

                                        @Natasha_Jay this DESPITE the foundational study's Conclusion that it is inaccurate.

                                        https://openaccess-api.cms-conferences.org/articles/download/978-1-964867-73-1_45

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        natasha_jay@tech.lgbt
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #44

                                        @ghostrunner
                                        Why am I not surprised? 🙄

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • natasha_jay@tech.lgbtN natasha_jay@tech.lgbt

                                          I just consulted 54 trillion "people" who agree that this is idiotic.

                                          #AI #LLM #SiliconSampling

                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          S This user is from outside of this forum
                                          slotos@toot.community
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #45

                                          @Natasha_Jay Are we automating Goodheart’s law now?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups