So when people start leaving a group (party, church, etc) folks always focus on where they go, and grumble about ‘those people’ doing dastardly underhanded things to somehow ‘unfairly’ attract people out to join them.
-
So when people start leaving a group (party, church, etc) folks always focus on where they go, and grumble about ‘those people’ doing dastardly underhanded things to somehow ‘unfairly’ attract people out to join them. In my experience people who move have usually been pushed first: like rats fleeing a sinking ship, look at where they started to see the source of the problem.
Yes, this is about Canadian politics.
-
So when people start leaving a group (party, church, etc) folks always focus on where they go, and grumble about ‘those people’ doing dastardly underhanded things to somehow ‘unfairly’ attract people out to join them. In my experience people who move have usually been pushed first: like rats fleeing a sinking ship, look at where they started to see the source of the problem.
Yes, this is about Canadian politics.
@DavidM_yeg It also reflects, to some extent, that the LPC under Carney look more like the Progressive Conservatives of the early 70’s, under Robert Stanfield and Joe Clark.
-
@DavidM_yeg It also reflects, to some extent, that the LPC under Carney look more like the Progressive Conservatives of the early 70’s, under Robert Stanfield and Joe Clark.
Yes, of course, but that wouldn’t matter if MPs weren’t already restless, unhappy, and looking for a change.
-
Yes, of course, but that wouldn’t matter if MPs weren’t already restless, unhappy, and looking for a change.
@DavidM_yeg @adamvs1 The question is whether those MPs are unhappy simply with being in opposition & not being invited to take credit for the gravy train of new government infrastructure investment announcements? Or are they unhappy with being treated like minions in one man's personal popularity campaign?
(Probably a bit of both, but some more one than the other.)
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic