Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful!

When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
134 Posts 54 Posters 48 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

    @jwildeboer @rubinjoni @derunglaublichefalk man, the grid frequency is important for much more infrastructure that you think! I understand your point, for sure. but I am reaaaallly not sure that it's feasible!

    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
    wrote last edited by
    #62

    @f4grx My point is — we are not even trying to explore the feasibility, because it is immediately shut down with "The Holy Grid Frequency Shall Not Be Questioned". But exactly this approach of a new grid design is now being explored in regions where there effectively is no grid but lots of local solar/wind plants. @rubinjoni @derunglaublichefalk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

      @Reinald There's real scarcity and artificial scarcity. I dare say that the whole digital/internet business is based on artificial scarcity, where we accept things like Digital Rights Management to keep the reality of abundance more or less a secret.

      openrisk@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      openrisk@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      openrisk@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #63

      @jwildeboer @Reinald in the biophysical domain scarcity is more or less anchored on the planetary boundaries (and within reason, renewable energy is not constrained by them 💚, though it gets more complicated with supply chains and waste etc)

      In the human domain, what can I say, this magical silicon stuff is something humanity doesn't deserve. For decades visionaries waxed lyrical about its incredible potential and in practice all that happens is deeper levels of dystopia. Something's gotta give

      reinald@nrw.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

        When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

        donchacale@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        donchacale@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        donchacale@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #64

        @jwildeboer
        more like it's the legislative branch is bought and paid for by the petro state...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • openrisk@mastodon.socialO openrisk@mastodon.social

          @jwildeboer @Reinald in the biophysical domain scarcity is more or less anchored on the planetary boundaries (and within reason, renewable energy is not constrained by them 💚, though it gets more complicated with supply chains and waste etc)

          In the human domain, what can I say, this magical silicon stuff is something humanity doesn't deserve. For decades visionaries waxed lyrical about its incredible potential and in practice all that happens is deeper levels of dystopia. Something's gotta give

          reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          reinald@nrw.social
          wrote last edited by
          #65

          @openrisk @jwildeboer for me, abundance means: enough for everybody. It is, of course, within planetary limits. With growth rates declining, peak humanity might be at 10 or 11 Billion human beeings. And they all could have a decent and healthy life. They could not all have 150m yachts and private jets.

          openrisk@mastodon.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • reinald@nrw.socialR reinald@nrw.social

            @openrisk @jwildeboer for me, abundance means: enough for everybody. It is, of course, within planetary limits. With growth rates declining, peak humanity might be at 10 or 11 Billion human beeings. And they all could have a decent and healthy life. They could not all have 150m yachts and private jets.

            openrisk@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            openrisk@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
            openrisk@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #66

            @Reinald

            one would have to do the calculation but its not inconceivable that everybody of the 11 billion could have at least *some* "yacht" experience in their lives (and 50% would get sea-sick and hate it 🤣 ).

            Of course if we keep inventing materially wasteful status symbols to play paleolithic social dominance games via "ownership" and exlcusion, we do run against hard limits. So-called "space tourism" comes to mind as obvious example.

            @jwildeboer

            jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • openrisk@mastodon.socialO openrisk@mastodon.social

              @Reinald

              one would have to do the calculation but its not inconceivable that everybody of the 11 billion could have at least *some* "yacht" experience in their lives (and 50% would get sea-sick and hate it 🤣 ).

              Of course if we keep inventing materially wasteful status symbols to play paleolithic social dominance games via "ownership" and exlcusion, we do run against hard limits. So-called "space tourism" comes to mind as obvious example.

              @jwildeboer

              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
              wrote last edited by
              #67

              @openrisk That's galaxies away from the "How can we store renewables" that I asked at the start of this thread 😉 @Reinald

              reinald@nrw.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                @openrisk That's galaxies away from the "How can we store renewables" that I asked at the start of this thread 😉 @Reinald

                reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                reinald@nrw.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                reinald@nrw.social
                wrote last edited by
                #68

                @jwildeboer @openrisk yes and no. Ending Scarcity is not in the interest of big companies in that area. And the Technologie is allready there - batteries work (even commercially), H2 electrolysis not yet, seasonal cycles not yet. For short term stabilizing even flywheels work.

                oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO P 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                  @ChrisW84 Remember that most of the current grid operators were created through privatising the grid, which used to be publicly owned infrastructure. They happily took over the grids, reduced investing for many years while driving up the costs for consumers in the name of shareholder value.

                  chrisw84@troet.cafeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chrisw84@troet.cafeC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chrisw84@troet.cafe
                  wrote last edited by
                  #69

                  @jwildeboer das muss man klar differenzieren. In den 90ern haben die großen Konzerne wie E.ON, RWE usw soviel Kapital wie möglich aus Kraftwerken und Netzen gezogen und kaum investiert. Die Kraftwerke wurden geschlossen und die Netze an die jetzigen Betreiber veräußert. Den trümmerhaufen haben die jetzigen Betreiber zum Großteil erneuert und ausgebaut mit Kapital vom Markt oder aktivierbar mit Segen der BNetzA über Netzentgelte. Die wären schon viel weiter ohne die Politischen Bremser.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                    When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                    archivescribe@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    archivescribe@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    archivescribe@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #70

                    @jwildeboer We have been brainwashed by capitalism.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                      When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                      cauzation@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cauzation@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cauzation@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #71

                      @jwildeboer It's fair to claim that the 'American Experiment' is based on the wealthiest controlling root, vital infrastructure, to setup and continue abuses such as this. #PlannedObsolescence #education, #UltraProcessedFoods diminishing vitality range - especially brain function based on gi tract depletion - conditioning into trickle-DOWN economics, without symmetrical return.

                      Since a Mamdani/Bernie/AOC team needs scale, a #DemocraticSocialist #Revolution is required. So how to get started?..

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                        When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                        kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kkarhan@jorts.horse
                        wrote last edited by
                        #72

                        @jwildeboer exactly that is the problem!

                        • Alongside the way #privatization makes #energy more expensive!
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                          When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                          karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                          karlheinzhaslip@climatejustice.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #73

                          @jwildeboer Not to speak of all the ways extra electricity could be used opportunistically. Thinking of scrap yards steel recycling for example.

                          tim@mastodon.energyT 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                            When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                            dexternemrod@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dexternemrod@troet.cafeD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dexternemrod@troet.cafe
                            wrote last edited by
                            #74

                            @jwildeboer
                            I also think, that batteries/storage solutions are one of the next necessary steps.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                              When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                              jamesvasile@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jamesvasile@fosstodon.orgJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jamesvasile@fosstodon.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #75

                              @jwildeboer We need constant reliability and have legacy constraints. Utilities *should* be cautious and slow to change. It's moving, but it's not entirely clear how you get from current state to a better grid, given regulator/rate-payer caution and ignorance. If all loads are now DC from a grid perspective, maybe we need an entirely new grid. And in some place we are doing that.

                              The grid started as disjoint, private, local (often coop) efforts. The new grid might well start the same way.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • reinald@nrw.socialR reinald@nrw.social

                                @jwildeboer you are right on this. Digital media is managed for scarcity. But in pysical world it is not so much different - most scarcity is artificial. If we would organize smarter, distribute better, produce more intelligently, many many people would suffer way less.

                                ptesarik@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                ptesarik@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                ptesarik@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #76

                                @Reinald @jwildeboer Yes, in theory. As someone who grew up in a centrally planned economy, I'm doubtful that the society can do much better than capitalism.

                                P 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                  When renewables flood the grid with more electricity than is needed at that moment, we don’t say „How wonderful! Let’s find ways to store that excess electricity so we can share it back to the grid when needed.“ Instead we sing the song of fossil fuel capitalism that claims this is a BAD thing and we need to shut down the renewable plants so The Grid can keep on working based on scarcity and rent seeking. It's like we all have been brainwashed by the grid operators and the fossile fuel industry.

                                  sheddi@mstdn.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sheddi@mstdn.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sheddi@mstdn.party
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #77

                                  @jwildeboer
                                  You might already know this, but on both days last weekend the UK grid was so awash with renewable electricity that prices went negative. Customers on price-tracking tariffs were paid to use electricity for most of the day.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Energy Stats UK (@energystatsuk@mastodonapp.uk)

                                  Attached: 1 image National average pricing for Octopus Energy Agile Tariff: Sat 11-04-2026 Min: -11.4p (14:30) Max: 15.3p (18:30) Avg: -2.2p Avg Excl Peak: -4.1p Peak 4pm-7pm: 10.0p Get graphs & pricing for all 14 UK regions at http://energy-stats.uk/octopus-agile-tariff-pricing/

                                  favicon

                                  Mastodon App UK (mastodonapp.uk)

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • reinald@nrw.socialR reinald@nrw.social

                                    @jwildeboer @openrisk yes and no. Ending Scarcity is not in the interest of big companies in that area. And the Technologie is allready there - batteries work (even commercially), H2 electrolysis not yet, seasonal cycles not yet. For short term stabilizing even flywheels work.

                                    oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ie
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #78

                                    @Reinald @jwildeboer @openrisk
                                    Batteries come with their own set of problems, which is not to say these are insurmountable, specifically social and environmental costs in acquiring the raw materials.

                                    The real difficulty, as I see it, is that we can produce excess energy for half the year but consumption in the other half exceeds production. Can we run energy intensive industries for just half the year? Otherwise we need ways to store energy for the other half.

                                    ptesarik@infosec.exchangeP reinald@nrw.socialR valhalla@social.gl-como.itV 3 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • lechimp@mastodon.pub.solarL lechimp@mastodon.pub.solar

                                      @valhalla @jwildeboer ironing clothing should be fine as well 😃

                                      valhalla@social.gl-como.itV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      valhalla@social.gl-como.itV This user is from outside of this forum
                                      valhalla@social.gl-como.it
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #79

                                      @lechimp @jwildeboer an useful use of energy? very

                                      but I could have been eating cake! 😄

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ieO oneinterestingfact@mastodon.ie

                                        @Reinald @jwildeboer @openrisk
                                        Batteries come with their own set of problems, which is not to say these are insurmountable, specifically social and environmental costs in acquiring the raw materials.

                                        The real difficulty, as I see it, is that we can produce excess energy for half the year but consumption in the other half exceeds production. Can we run energy intensive industries for just half the year? Otherwise we need ways to store energy for the other half.

                                        ptesarik@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ptesarik@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ptesarik@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #80

                                        @OneInterestingFact @Reinald @jwildeboer @openrisk Since I can see #batteries mentioned in this thread, have you heard about this project? #flowbattery #opensourcehardware
                                        https://fbrc.dev/

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.netJ jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net

                                          (No need to reply with "not me!", I know. I exaggerated with the inclusive "we" to make my point clear. The majority of people out there don't have thinking about a better, more decentralised and self-balancing grid to make electricity more of a commodity on their priority list.)

                                          neuimneuland@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          neuimneuland@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          neuimneuland@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #81

                                          @jwildeboer It's not only framed as a BAD thing, it is claimed that "too much renewable energy" costs a lot of money.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups