Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Lindsey Graham does not understand that the US gains no support for an illegal attack on Iran from other NATO countries, whom his preferred President wanted to invaded only a few weeks ago.

Lindsey Graham does not understand that the US gains no support for an illegal attack on Iran from other NATO countries, whom his preferred President wanted to invaded only a few weeks ago.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
23 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

    Lindsey Graham does not understand that the US gains no support for an illegal attack on Iran from other NATO countries, whom his preferred President wanted to invaded only a few weeks ago.

    Who would have thought, that after more than a year of $0 Ukraine support from the US, European nations do not want to fund an illegal attack on Iran, designed to drag attention away from The Epstein Files.

    What a profoundly shocking development. Poor Lindsey.

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    dorj740@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @randahl lindsay graham is the biggest traitor to my country ever, where ever the money is he goes, no guts what so ever

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

      Lindsey Graham does not understand that the US gains no support for an illegal attack on Iran from other NATO countries, whom his preferred President wanted to invaded only a few weeks ago.

      Who would have thought, that after more than a year of $0 Ukraine support from the US, European nations do not want to fund an illegal attack on Iran, designed to drag attention away from The Epstein Files.

      What a profoundly shocking development. Poor Lindsey.

      chrisholladay@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      chrisholladay@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
      chrisholladay@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @randahl
      Lindsey drank way too much Trump juice.
      Directly from the source

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • randahl@mastodon.socialR randahl@mastodon.social

        Lindsey Graham does not understand that the US gains no support for an illegal attack on Iran from other NATO countries, whom his preferred President wanted to invaded only a few weeks ago.

        Who would have thought, that after more than a year of $0 Ukraine support from the US, European nations do not want to fund an illegal attack on Iran, designed to drag attention away from The Epstein Files.

        What a profoundly shocking development. Poor Lindsey.

        michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        michael@westergaard.social
        wrote last edited by
        #23
        My not very comforting theory is that this is another step in dismantling NATO.

        Idea: illegally invade various countries, latest Iran. Invoke article 5. It does not work like that - I know that, you know that, but the US president barely knows his own name despite it being plastered everywhere he touches in piss-colored letters, so why would he know and much less care how NATO works?

        Europe doesn’t fund the Epstein-diversion, I mean war, so when Russia attacks later this year (or maybe in 2027) and article 5 is invoked legitimately, the US will use our refusal now to deny support then, effectively ending NATO.

        The president is not smart enough to come up with such a plan, but is easily controlled using something shiny or stroking his ego, and his cabinet has enough Russian agents that could put the idea (or at least the individual steps, one at a time) into his head.
        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        0
        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups