Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Wow, this chart is wild!!

Wow, this chart is wild!!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
canpolicdnpolidemocracy
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.caC This user is from outside of this forum
    chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.caC This user is from outside of this forum
    chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Wow, this chart is wild!! Also, UK Ministers are dropping like flies, which means Starmer is going to be gone soon.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c1e2n923v1lt

    What is it that people say about Proportional Representation creating unstable governments?

    Meanwhile, the birthplace of First Past the Post, Tory/Whig, Red/Blue, two-party Parliamentary systems has been flip flopping more and more over the past 40 years.

    Here is a quick mirror in Canadian (elected PMs) starting with P. Trudeau in 1968. My quick brain-calculated time periods may not be perfect.

    We have not seen the same change to shorter terms, I believe because there has been a concerted effort since Pierre Trudeau and likely before him to diminish the role and power of individual MPs and concentrate power in the PMO.

    The only serious push against that, I think, has been CPC MP Michael Chong's Reform Act which gave the ability for MPs to replace the leader, and J Trudeau's unilateral expelling of Senators from the Liberal Caucus which has caused that chamber to become nearly completely made up of "independent groupings”.

    1968 - PET1: 11yrs 4mo
    1979 Joe Clark: <1yr
    1980 PET2: 4yr 4mo
    1984 Brian Mulroney: 8yr 10mo
    1993 Jean Chretien: 9yr 11mo
    2003 Paul Martin: 2yr 2mo
    2006 Stephen Harper: 9yr 9mo
    2015 Justin Trudeau: 9yr 5mo

    #CanPoli #CdnPoli #Democracy

    https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c1e2n923v1lt

    Link Preview Image
    zazzoo@mstdn.caZ 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.caC chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.ca

      Wow, this chart is wild!! Also, UK Ministers are dropping like flies, which means Starmer is going to be gone soon.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c1e2n923v1lt

      What is it that people say about Proportional Representation creating unstable governments?

      Meanwhile, the birthplace of First Past the Post, Tory/Whig, Red/Blue, two-party Parliamentary systems has been flip flopping more and more over the past 40 years.

      Here is a quick mirror in Canadian (elected PMs) starting with P. Trudeau in 1968. My quick brain-calculated time periods may not be perfect.

      We have not seen the same change to shorter terms, I believe because there has been a concerted effort since Pierre Trudeau and likely before him to diminish the role and power of individual MPs and concentrate power in the PMO.

      The only serious push against that, I think, has been CPC MP Michael Chong's Reform Act which gave the ability for MPs to replace the leader, and J Trudeau's unilateral expelling of Senators from the Liberal Caucus which has caused that chamber to become nearly completely made up of "independent groupings”.

      1968 - PET1: 11yrs 4mo
      1979 Joe Clark: <1yr
      1980 PET2: 4yr 4mo
      1984 Brian Mulroney: 8yr 10mo
      1993 Jean Chretien: 9yr 11mo
      2003 Paul Martin: 2yr 2mo
      2006 Stephen Harper: 9yr 9mo
      2015 Justin Trudeau: 9yr 5mo

      #CanPoli #CdnPoli #Democracy

      https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c1e2n923v1lt

      Link Preview Image
      zazzoo@mstdn.caZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zazzoo@mstdn.caZ This user is from outside of this forum
      zazzoo@mstdn.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @chris You missed 1984 John Turner, 2 mo.

      I think what people argue against isn't so much PR but minority governments and weak coalitions. For the record, I don't side with them on that argument, but I think that's the issue - as demonstrated by what happens in a FPTP system when the government doesn't hold a majority and the opposition is gunning to force an election.

      My counter-argument is that a lot of the impetus to take down a minority government in a FPTP system is the understanding that, due to FPTP, the opposition stands a solid chance at forming government. You're either government or your not, with no need to play nice with anybody else.

      Also, funny enough, I've been seeing a lot of merit in 'governance by random lottery' lately. Even random chance fairs better in my head than FPTP.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups