I'm currently working on adding some FreeBSD support to my crazytrace program
-
I'm currently working on adding some FreeBSD support to my crazytrace program.
I rely heavily on Codeberg's Woodpecker CI - unfortunately, however, this CI doesn't support FreeBSD.
But BoxyBSD was kind enough to provide me with a second VM, where a FreeBSD Woodpecker agent is now running, giving me a private FreeBSD CI for my projects.
It seems to be working very well.https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-CI/feedback/issues/297
https://ci.codeberg.org/repos/13147/pipeline/313/3
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/crazytrace/src/commit/a28170353e40918f7a64c6a00e1a91adad70ea22/.woodpecker/build-freebsd.yaml -
I'm currently working on adding some FreeBSD support to my crazytrace program.
I rely heavily on Codeberg's Woodpecker CI - unfortunately, however, this CI doesn't support FreeBSD.
But BoxyBSD was kind enough to provide me with a second VM, where a FreeBSD Woodpecker agent is now running, giving me a private FreeBSD CI for my projects.
It seems to be working very well.https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-CI/feedback/issues/297
https://ci.codeberg.org/repos/13147/pipeline/313/3
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/crazytrace/src/commit/a28170353e40918f7a64c6a00e1a91adad70ea22/.woodpecker/build-freebsd.yaml@mark22k Have you considered that Codeberg's Woodpecker CI might eventually add official FreeBSD support, making your private setup unnecessary?
-
System shared this topic
