The police in the UK think they can be trusted with facial recognition data, including destroying all images not relevant to reported crimes.
-
The police in the UK think they can be trusted with facial recognition data, including destroying all images not relevant to reported crimes.
And yet, they could not be bothered to correctly document the location of the theft of the PM’s righthand man’s phone. The messages and data held on this phone were a matter of utmost national security.
Police to reassess Morgan McSweeney phone theft over address error
Force previously said it was ‘too busy’ to investigate theft despite it potentially holding sensitive information
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
-
The police in the UK think they can be trusted with facial recognition data, including destroying all images not relevant to reported crimes.
And yet, they could not be bothered to correctly document the location of the theft of the PM’s righthand man’s phone. The messages and data held on this phone were a matter of utmost national security.
Police to reassess Morgan McSweeney phone theft over address error
Force previously said it was ‘too busy’ to investigate theft despite it potentially holding sensitive information
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
Pay wall, so article is not accessible. So I do not know all the details.
If this person had utmost national security on their cell phone then they belong in prison. There is no scenario were that is not gross criminal negligence. I hope the description has been exaggerated in order to motivate the police and not a real issue.
If he indeed did have utmost national security on a phone then he does not belong in politics, and needs to answer for his crimes against humanity.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
