Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

“When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
onlinesafetydigitalidprivacyfreedomofexpresageverification
14 Posts 13 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

    “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

    Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

    This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

    🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

    Link Preview Image
    UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

    The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

    favicon

    POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

    #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

    timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
    timwardcam@c.imT This user is from outside of this forum
    timwardcam@c.im
    wrote last edited by
    #3

    @openrightsgroup “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

    Absolutely. When we rewrote the constitution for #Cambridge City Council we didn't write a constitution to give us the powers we thought we'd like whilst we were running the council, we wrote it to provide the safeguards we'd want when one day we ended up in opposition.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

      “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

      Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

      This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

      🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

      Link Preview Image
      UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

      The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

      favicon

      POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

      #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

      revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
      revk@toot.me.ukR This user is from outside of this forum
      revk@toot.me.uk
      wrote last edited by
      #4

      @openrightsgroup also, making ID checks “normal” means dodgy sites will collect ID as well.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

        “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

        Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

        This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

        🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

        Link Preview Image
        UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

        The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

        favicon

        POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

        #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

        G This user is from outside of this forum
        G This user is from outside of this forum
        gwentlarry@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #5

        @openrightsgroup

        Local councils have in the past tried to use anti-terror laws to check people's bins …!

        Link Preview Image
        No more bin snooping: Council bureaucrats to be banned from using anti-terror spy laws

        Town Hall bureaucrats are to be banned from using anti-terror laws to spy on people suspected of 'minor bin crimes’.

        favicon

        Mail Online (www.dailymail.co.uk)

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • drajt@fosstodon.orgD drajt@fosstodon.org shared this topic
          R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
          R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
        • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

          “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

          Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

          This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

          🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

          Link Preview Image
          UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

          The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

          favicon

          POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

          #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

          christo_459@mastodon.me.ukC This user is from outside of this forum
          christo_459@mastodon.me.ukC This user is from outside of this forum
          christo_459@mastodon.me.uk
          wrote last edited by
          #6

          @openrightsgroup
          What's the difference between an extreme authoritarian, anti immigrant illegal war supporting Labour Party and a fascist party?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

            “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

            Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

            This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

            🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

            Link Preview Image
            UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

            The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

            favicon

            POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

            #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

            celeduc@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            celeduc@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
            celeduc@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #7

            @openrightsgroup wow it's almost like they don't care / actually want that to happen

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

              Digital ID checks ransom our access to information.

              We’re forced to splurge our sensitive data all over the place, eroding our freedoms and creating a privacy timebomb.

              It’s lose lose.

              UK MPs mustn't hand the government unbridled powers over all Internet services in today's vote.

              Write to your MP ⬇️

              Link Preview Image
              No ID Checks for Web Access

              Take action! What’s the problem? The Government has proposed amendments to the Children Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which would give Ministers the power to restrict access to "internet services". This is supposed to give the Government the power to ban under 16s from social media but “internet services" is a very broad definition, which means any online platform can be

              favicon

              Open Rights Group (action.openrightsgroup.org)

              #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

              walrus@toot.walesW This user is from outside of this forum
              walrus@toot.walesW This user is from outside of this forum
              walrus@toot.wales
              wrote last edited by
              #8

              @openrightsgroup

              Done. And re-shared. Nice that ORG has a share to Mastodon button!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

                Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

                This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

                🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

                Link Preview Image
                UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

                The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

                favicon

                POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

                #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                krnlg@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                krnlg@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #9

                @openrightsgroup
                Have to say, I don't trust the current government to use such powers responsibly either.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                  “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

                  Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

                  This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

                  🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

                  Link Preview Image
                  UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

                  The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

                  favicon

                  POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

                  #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  fooker@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #10

                  @openrightsgroup could? It will be used sooner or later against someone, be it LQBTQIA+, immigrants, people who disagree with those in power..

                  All power corrupts.. you know the rest.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                    Digital ID checks ransom our access to information.

                    We’re forced to splurge our sensitive data all over the place, eroding our freedoms and creating a privacy timebomb.

                    It’s lose lose.

                    UK MPs mustn't hand the government unbridled powers over all Internet services in today's vote.

                    Write to your MP ⬇️

                    Link Preview Image
                    No ID Checks for Web Access

                    Take action! What’s the problem? The Government has proposed amendments to the Children Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which would give Ministers the power to restrict access to "internet services". This is supposed to give the Government the power to ban under 16s from social media but “internet services" is a very broad definition, which means any online platform can be

                    favicon

                    Open Rights Group (action.openrightsgroup.org)

                    #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

                    johntinker@hear-me.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    johntinker@hear-me.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    johntinker@hear-me.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #11

                    @openrightsgroup
                    ID checks for everyone demanding ID checks. Get to know who is insisting on this. Get to know all about them.

                    tirrimas@beige.partyT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                      “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

                      Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

                      This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

                      🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

                      Link Preview Image
                      UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

                      The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

                      favicon

                      POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

                      #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

                      richrarobi@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      richrarobi@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                      richrarobi@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #12

                      @openrightsgroup

                      Eff off #starmer !!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.orgO openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

                        “When you create a law, you have to think about what a future government could do with those powers."

                        Ministers would have unilateral powers to lock what they see as 'harmful' behind digital ID checks.

                        This could end up being used on LGBTQ+ and reproductive health content.

                        🗣️ ORG's James Baker.

                        Link Preview Image
                        UK eyes sweeping powers to regulate tech  

                        The U.K. government has laid two amendments that would let it sidestep parliamentary debate so it can update online safety laws.

                        favicon

                        POLITICO (www.politico.eu)

                        #onlinesafety #digitalid #privacy #freedomofexpression #ageverification #ukpolitics #ukpol

                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                        tburkhol@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #13

                        @openrightsgroup I feel like threatening to lock LGBTQ+ or reproductive health information behind ID checks is *exactly* what some of the proponents hope for.

                        What if the Bible were locked away?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • johntinker@hear-me.socialJ johntinker@hear-me.social

                          @openrightsgroup
                          ID checks for everyone demanding ID checks. Get to know who is insisting on this. Get to know all about them.

                          tirrimas@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tirrimas@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tirrimas@beige.party
                          wrote last edited by
                          #14

                          @johntinker @openrightsgroup double-checked against The Files

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups