waaay too convenient for Anthropic.
-
waaay too convenient for Anthropic.
Absolutely no filter, no way to verify claims, no critical press or disappointed consumers.
Just Anthropic blindsiding the cybersecurity market which they couldn’t plausibly get into before.
The stink of bullshit comes naturally with genAI companies, but this is a new level.
https://wowhow.cloud/blogs/anthropic-claude-mythos-leak-10-trillion-parameters-cybersecurity
-
waaay too convenient for Anthropic.
Absolutely no filter, no way to verify claims, no critical press or disappointed consumers.
Just Anthropic blindsiding the cybersecurity market which they couldn’t plausibly get into before.
The stink of bullshit comes naturally with genAI companies, but this is a new level.
https://wowhow.cloud/blogs/anthropic-claude-mythos-leak-10-trillion-parameters-cybersecurity
@avuko@infosec.exchange I've read far too much AI slop so I can nowadays detect things like:
That's not a competitor talking. That's the company that built it.
That was written with AI.
Every time you read "it's not X, it's Y", that's classic LLM verbiage.
I would not be surprised if the entire article was LLM-written with minimal human supervision. -
@avuko@infosec.exchange I've read far too much AI slop so I can nowadays detect things like:
That's not a competitor talking. That's the company that built it.
That was written with AI.
Every time you read "it's not X, it's Y", that's classic LLM verbiage.
I would not be surprised if the entire article was LLM-written with minimal human supervision.@ulveon concur. I’m willing to bet both the article about Anthropic and the original pitch deck/ Anthropic are genAI drivel.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
