Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Finally (!) finished reading the 170-page (!!) IEEPA/Trump tariffs case, Learning Resources v. Trump.

Finally (!) finished reading the 170-page (!!) IEEPA/Trump tariffs case, Learning Resources v. Trump.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
lawfedi
25 Posts 10 Posters 14 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH heidilifeldman@mastodon.social

    Kavanaugh’s dissent’s bottom line: there is no problem with the President dictatorially usurping Congress’ tariff power, because, as it turns out Congress has being building up for decades to give Trump whatever dictatorial powers he wants. Alito and Thomas are with this program so they join the dissent. But bc he’s fighting to be CJSCG, Kavanaugh has to write MANY pages on his uniquely correct and distinctive statutory construction method which leads him to say Trump can do what he pleases. 9/

    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    deepmud@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    @heidilifeldman who was it that paid kavanaughs couple hundred k debt??

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH heidilifeldman@mastodon.social

      The United States is under attack by an anti-constitutional, authoritarian President. The current Supreme Court cannot manage a crisp 6-3 decision about one small component of the regime’s disregard for the Constitution and for Congress. What we got instead⬇️ 13/13

      Link Preview Image
      p__x@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      p__x@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      p__x@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      @heidilifeldman I'm still trying to figure out why some held such high opinions of the SCOTUS. My training over the past 20 years revolved around reasoning and I just can't find coherent reasoning behind these SCOTUS opinions.

      heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • elaterite@mastoart.socialE elaterite@mastoart.social

        @heidilifeldman Thanks for the thread! So I guess the conservative doctrine of strict constructionism and adherence to original intent is dead, eh? (Of course, they drove a stake through that quaint concept with the immunity ruling in '24.)

        heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
        heidilifeldman@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        @elaterite there are no adjudicatory principles, just infighting and a disdain for women, people of color, and anybody who isn’t ultra-wealthy.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • msbellows@c.imM msbellows@c.im

          @heidilifeldman Thank you for proving I got today's daily Roberts curse right. https://c.im/@msbellows/116115096883612516

          heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
          heidilifeldman@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          @msbellows indeed you did.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • p__x@mastodon.socialP p__x@mastodon.social

            @heidilifeldman I'm still trying to figure out why some held such high opinions of the SCOTUS. My training over the past 20 years revolved around reasoning and I just can't find coherent reasoning behind these SCOTUS opinions.

            heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            heidilifeldman@mastodon.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
            heidilifeldman@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            @P__X The Supreme Court very rarely has very good reasoners as justices. There are many reasons why it is often in my opinion one of the least well staffed courts in the federal judiciary. The Robert score is particularly egregious because the majority not even aspiring to the craft of adjudication in a constitutional democracy.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups