Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed.

It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 20 Posters 51 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

    It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed. Like, I remember in 2023ish spending a while working on a system to securely trigger remote builds, because we couldn't have our slack chatbots on the same network as our Jenkins server

    And in 2026 they just give a 3rd party LLM write access to both + the git repo

    tijn@dosgame.clubT This user is from outside of this forum
    tijn@dosgame.clubT This user is from outside of this forum
    tijn@dosgame.club
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @foone I love this sort of stuff tbh. Just like NFTs, it's great to have a filter like this that clearly shows who's actually nuts and who isn't.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

      I have SEPARATE TOOLS and TECHNIQUES for hacking humans and computer hardware and computer software. Mixing them up is just wrong and unfun.

      foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
      foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
      foone@digipres.club
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      hacking a computer program pretending to be a human is like some weird neo-victorian parlor game in The Diamond Age

      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI pandabutter@plush.cityP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

        hacking a computer program pretending to be a human is like some weird neo-victorian parlor game in The Diamond Age

        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @foone it has also passed through our mind that if there is ever some really high-stakes version in which we have to do so, for survival's sake, our ability to do it will depend on the extent to which our personal way of thinking is under-represented in the training set. so we're not eager to donate our efforts to anyone's training set.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.orgB bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.org

          @foone

          You forgot the part where a developer deletes production database and its all volume backups via an agent in 9 seconds, and forces the agent to confess the error.

          Like the agent has its own mind.

          Unbelievable.

          Ref: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47911524

          ellie@ellieayla.netE This user is from outside of this forum
          ellie@ellieayla.netE This user is from outside of this forum
          ellie@ellieayla.net
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @bayindirh @foone can't have vulnerabilities without any production!

          bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.orgB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.orgB bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.org

            @foone

            You forgot the part where a developer deletes production database and its all volume backups via an agent in 9 seconds, and forces the agent to confess the error.

            Like the agent has its own mind.

            Unbelievable.

            Ref: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47911524

            foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
            foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
            foone@digipres.club
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @bayindirh yeah that story (and some recent experiences I can't go into) is what prompted this

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ellie@ellieayla.netE ellie@ellieayla.net

              @bayindirh @foone can't have vulnerabilities without any production!

              bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
              bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.orgB This user is from outside of this forum
              bayindirh@mastodon.sdf.org
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @ellie @foone
              This is why I label all my projects as eternal betas.

              None of my tools are in production, so they are secure by definition.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • wtrmt@mastodon.socialW wtrmt@mastodon.social

                @foone I do wonder how certain industries and institutions are doing under the pressure to conform to these new ways of doing things (banks, hospitals, scientists)

                wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wtrmt@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @foone I used to work for a bank with a huge security overhead. The machines that everyone used had quite a few limitations due to security. Windows 11 w Copilot must have them like the Chihuahua from Ren & Stimpy

                9 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                  It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed. Like, I remember in 2023ish spending a while working on a system to securely trigger remote builds, because we couldn't have our slack chatbots on the same network as our Jenkins server

                  And in 2026 they just give a 3rd party LLM write access to both + the git repo

                  mossyfoot@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mossyfoot@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mossyfoot@pdx.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @foone but on the other hand the regulators still haven't read the correct horse battery staple XKCD cartoon and still demand stupid passwords that everyone forgets.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                    It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed. Like, I remember in 2023ish spending a while working on a system to securely trigger remote builds, because we couldn't have our slack chatbots on the same network as our Jenkins server

                    And in 2026 they just give a 3rd party LLM write access to both + the git repo

                    jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackemled@furry.engineer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @foone How long until I can find sensitive government & corporate computers exposed to the Internet by wardialing again? Maybe malicious actors can start asking company chatbots to open telnet ports.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                      It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed. Like, I remember in 2023ish spending a while working on a system to securely trigger remote builds, because we couldn't have our slack chatbots on the same network as our Jenkins server

                      And in 2026 they just give a 3rd party LLM write access to both + the git repo

                      sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sassinake@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sassinake@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @foone people stopped caring. this is what 'work alienation' does to 'the work'. it removes the craft, the skill. workers are swapped out like Legos before they become invested in the work, before they become expensive.

                      the quality stops mattering, because the company will stop existing in 5 years, when guarantees turn into lawsuits.

                      funds are received to start projects, but every one leaves before the finish. no one is responsible. no one cares.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • wtrmt@mastodon.socialW wtrmt@mastodon.social

                        @foone I used to work for a bank with a huge security overhead. The machines that everyone used had quite a few limitations due to security. Windows 11 w Copilot must have them like the Chihuahua from Ren & Stimpy

                        9 This user is from outside of this forum
                        9 This user is from outside of this forum
                        983620369@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @wtrmt @foone

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                          It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed. Like, I remember in 2023ish spending a while working on a system to securely trigger remote builds, because we couldn't have our slack chatbots on the same network as our Jenkins server

                          And in 2026 they just give a 3rd party LLM write access to both + the git repo

                          drwho@masto.hackers.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                          drwho@masto.hackers.townD This user is from outside of this forum
                          drwho@masto.hackers.town
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @foone Just like a lot of other stuff, once they didn't have to make an effort to care they immediately stopped.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                            It's amazing how fast attitudes to security in the industry has changed. Like, I remember in 2023ish spending a while working on a system to securely trigger remote builds, because we couldn't have our slack chatbots on the same network as our Jenkins server

                            And in 2026 they just give a 3rd party LLM write access to both + the git repo

                            praetor@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            praetor@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            praetor@mstdn.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @foone the ai companies present it all as a neck or nothing kind of thing. And that horrifies me. I used to be the CTO for a federal contractor. We did facilities management. And I could never imagine a fairly independent program having access to say our contracts, some of which were for classified projects. If you were an OpenAI sales rep and proposed that to me, you would be escorted out of my office. But people are doing it!!! For some goddammed unknown reason.

                            zlatko@social.zlatko.devZ 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • praetor@mstdn.socialP praetor@mstdn.social

                              @foone the ai companies present it all as a neck or nothing kind of thing. And that horrifies me. I used to be the CTO for a federal contractor. We did facilities management. And I could never imagine a fairly independent program having access to say our contracts, some of which were for classified projects. If you were an OpenAI sales rep and proposed that to me, you would be escorted out of my office. But people are doing it!!! For some goddammed unknown reason.

                              zlatko@social.zlatko.devZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zlatko@social.zlatko.devZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zlatko@social.zlatko.dev
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @praetor @foone oh the reason is probably not that unknown. They want your money.

                              praetor@mstdn.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • zlatko@social.zlatko.devZ zlatko@social.zlatko.dev

                                @praetor @foone oh the reason is probably not that unknown. They want your money.

                                praetor@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                praetor@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                praetor@mstdn.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @zlatko @foone Well, that is fairly obvious. But I don't know if you've ever done government work, but the data is far more valuable. And if you have a breach of classified data...you're done. You're toast.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tijn@dosgame.clubT tijn@dosgame.club

                                  @foone I love this sort of stuff tbh. Just like NFTs, it's great to have a filter like this that clearly shows who's actually nuts and who isn't.

                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                                  slotos@toot.community
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @Tijn @foone I don’t like the data that’s emerging, though.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                    hacking a computer program pretending to be a human is like some weird neo-victorian parlor game in The Diamond Age

                                    pandabutter@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pandabutter@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pandabutter@plush.city
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @foone thankfully, we all agree that it would be a terrible idea to make anything from Neil Stephenson books real.

                                    …right?

                                    pandabutter@plush.cityP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pandabutter@plush.cityP pandabutter@plush.city

                                      @foone thankfully, we all agree that it would be a terrible idea to make anything from Neil Stephenson books real.

                                      …right?

                                      pandabutter@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pandabutter@plush.cityP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pandabutter@plush.city
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @foone …sorry, it just hit me that they've done *three* of them now. Cryptonomicon, Snow Crash, The Diamond Age: crypto, metaverse, AI.

                                      Why is our society run by people who think the Torment Nexus sounds neat?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                        if I can convince your chatbox to add a new dependency to your software and push a new version to prod, it's just not worth my time to bother

                                        frawst@fedi.fraw.stF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        frawst@fedi.fraw.stF This user is from outside of this forum
                                        frawst@fedi.fraw.st
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @foone@digipres.club at this point i just laugh at the absurdity of it all, companies basically scrambling to put the world's most trusting doorman in front of all their sensitive tech and all you need now is a "pwetty pwease ​​"

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                          I have SEPARATE TOOLS and TECHNIQUES for hacking humans and computer hardware and computer software. Mixing them up is just wrong and unfun.

                                          jenetrix@shrimp.creatures.clubJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jenetrix@shrimp.creatures.clubJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jenetrix@shrimp.creatures.club
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29
                                          @foone Alice Averlong, Authorized and Certified Gender Technician.
                                          Link Preview Image
                                          foone@digipres.clubF 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups