Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI".

Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
74 Posts 42 Posters 87 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    But it was super fun to lead them through a "this is how you can force reasonable evaluation on 'AI' projects which kills most of them" framework and see how they felt empowered and able to actually do their job again.

    emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
    emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
    emma@orbital.horse
    wrote last edited by
    #23

    @tante do you have a link to that framework?

    Also: https://labornotes.org/2026/03/four-union-strategies-fight-ai

    tante@tldr.nettime.orgT n_dimension@infosec.exchangeN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

      @tante yeah it's a real "YOU HAD ONE JOB" situation

      otherdog@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      otherdog@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
      otherdog@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #24

      @glyph @tante Indeed and if you’re using something like Claude Opus on a high thinking level the enterprise plan is going to churn through cash at a remarkable rate. I still see very little serious cost analysis.

      glyph@mastodon.socialG ratsnakegames@mastodon.socialR 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

        @tante do you have a link to that framework?

        Also: https://labornotes.org/2026/03/four-union-strategies-fight-ai

        tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tante@tldr.nettime.orgT This user is from outside of this forum
        tante@tldr.nettime.org
        wrote last edited by
        #25

        @emma haven't formalized it fully so it's not written up anywhere. It's in my head and a few phrases on slides right now.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • snoopj@hachyderm.ioS snoopj@hachyderm.io

          @aud @tante @glyph the addition of "vision heads" has always been the brightest example of this to me, and came sooner than the craze for "agents".

          They ran out of runway to scale up on text alone but clearly adding more parameters was the thing that needed doing. Bolting an entire vision system to the side of the model sure does add a lot of parameters and keeps you on the curve of projected growth.

          It doesn't really solve any problems in a way that might generate revenue, but it demos quite well and a good demo is all you've ever really needed to separate tech speculators from their cash, *particularly* the ones gambling on "AI" at any point in tech history.

          aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
          aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
          aud@fire.asta.lgbt
          wrote last edited by
          #26

          @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io @tante@tldr.nettime.org @glyph@mastodon.social and now we have "so many models to choose from", so we get to play double extra bonus round roulette! Don't just vary your prompts, change models! Infinite combinatorics! You'll never run out of parameters to fiddle with! Burn those tokens, burn em good!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • otherdog@mastodon.socialO otherdog@mastodon.social

            @glyph @tante Indeed and if you’re using something like Claude Opus on a high thinking level the enterprise plan is going to churn through cash at a remarkable rate. I still see very little serious cost analysis.

            glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            glyph@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #27

            @otherdog @tante In my own analysis I discounted that cost to zero and still found myself estimating very heavy costs, just from the downsides of using the model itself, which AFAICT are going _totally_ unmeasured almost everywhere

            glyph@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

              @otherdog @tante In my own analysis I discounted that cost to zero and still found myself estimating very heavy costs, just from the downsides of using the model itself, which AFAICT are going _totally_ unmeasured almost everywhere

              glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              glyph@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              glyph@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #28

              @otherdog @tante I guess I'll drop the link again just for reference if you haven't seen it, I didn't do so above because I feel like I post this every single day now to the point where the self-promotion feels shameful. but it remains painfully, almost nauseatingly relevant, so, here you go https://blog.glyph.im/2025/08/futzing-fraction.html

              otherdog@mastodon.socialO profbib@layer8.spaceP 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI". And it's kinda wild hearing their stories from the wild: Management is 100% in fantasy "AI" can do everything land and makes huge plans for how to use "AI" to cut workers when real projects that supposedly can do 50% of a specific task end up being able to do 8%. And they still go live. It's fucking bonkers. CEO's are really not okay.

                dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #29

                @tante
                > CEO's are really not okay.

                Never have been.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                  Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI". And it's kinda wild hearing their stories from the wild: Management is 100% in fantasy "AI" can do everything land and makes huge plans for how to use "AI" to cut workers when real projects that supposedly can do 50% of a specific task end up being able to do 8%. And they still go live. It's fucking bonkers. CEO's are really not okay.

                  maxfenton@mas.toM This user is from outside of this forum
                  maxfenton@mas.toM This user is from outside of this forum
                  maxfenton@mas.to
                  wrote last edited by
                  #30

                  @tante Sounds about right

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                    Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI". And it's kinda wild hearing their stories from the wild: Management is 100% in fantasy "AI" can do everything land and makes huge plans for how to use "AI" to cut workers when real projects that supposedly can do 50% of a specific task end up being able to do 8%. And they still go live. It's fucking bonkers. CEO's are really not okay.

                    sablebadger@dice.campS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sablebadger@dice.campS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sablebadger@dice.camp
                    wrote last edited by
                    #31

                    @tante CEOs have to do that, they can't admit defeat, so they push ahead regardless and when the chips starts to fall they jump ship and blame it on workers.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                      @tante ceo's never were okay. I always found senior management a narcissistic bunch of assholes, always looking for the next cool project to burnish their cvs. Many were totally scared of tech, easily fooled. And many more were full on tech cultists, because the tech bros were always promising them how they could cut costs and fire people.

                      pkw@snac.d34d.netP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pkw@snac.d34d.netP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pkw@snac.d34d.net
                      wrote last edited by
                      #32
                      I regret being intimidated by C-levels as intelligent.
                      I wish I had my attitude from now when dealing
                      with them then.
                      (everything you said rings spot on to my anecdotes.)

                      CC: @tante@tldr.nettime.org
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                        @glyph the amount of times where I asked a CEO/CTO about their "AI" project and how they actually measure cost or what their measurable criteria for success are and only got someone looking at me as if I was speaking in tongues is really scary.

                        Like: Isn't turning everything into metrics and measurements in order to make data driven decisions what management is supposed to do?

                        dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                        dzwiedziu@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #33

                        @tante
                        And when they do Goodhart law strikes.

                        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law

                        @glyph

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                          @tante yeah it's a real "YOU HAD ONE JOB" situation

                          larsmb@mastodon.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
                          larsmb@mastodon.onlineL This user is from outside of this forum
                          larsmb@mastodon.online
                          wrote last edited by
                          #34

                          @glyph @tante

                          "AI is going to make us more productive at shipping our software."

                          "Great! Amazing! That must be several phd theses you got there! Well done! Didn't know you had it in you."

                          "?!?"

                          "Well, I mean, you must have figured out how to measure software development productivity reliably, right? What's our baseline at?"

                          S 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                            @otherdog @tante I guess I'll drop the link again just for reference if you haven't seen it, I didn't do so above because I feel like I post this every single day now to the point where the self-promotion feels shameful. but it remains painfully, almost nauseatingly relevant, so, here you go https://blog.glyph.im/2025/08/futzing-fraction.html

                            otherdog@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            otherdog@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            otherdog@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #35

                            @glyph Thank you for sharing that, a very thought-provoking read.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                              But: If you have any chance to speak to unions/workers from different domains and organizations do so.
                              It's fascinating how
                              a) different organizations are and operate
                              b) they all end up with the same handful of structural problems

                              carstenschridde@norden.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              carstenschridde@norden.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              carstenschridde@norden.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #36

                              @tante could you please write an essay about this top, i really need to read it!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jaredwhite@indieweb.socialJ jaredwhite@indieweb.social

                                @tante 9 times out of 10 (yes that's an anecdotal stat), the people most resistant to AI-all-the-things are the most talented, most dedicated workers. Orgs who penalize or fire those people are committing self-sabotage. 🙁

                                ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                ehproque@neopaquita.esE This user is from outside of this forum
                                ehproque@neopaquita.es
                                wrote last edited by
                                #37

                                @jaredwhite @tante why wouldn't they? The people who bullshit for a living are (ironically) not threatened, they're having the time of their lives instead

                                patrickleavy@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                  @tante yeah it's a real "YOU HAD ONE JOB" situation

                                  missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  missconstrue@mefi.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #38

                                  @glyph @tante I had to walk away from being an information architect because everyone wants to pivot to ai, when there is no such thing. I specialize creating information flows that get the right information to the right people. C-suite doesn’t need code docs, and SRE doesn’t need customer service scripts. But all aspects of an enterprise needs documentation for some user in the enterprise. Someone has to create the documentation, map the information, define users, create channels, etc.

                                  Csuite seems to think that it’s magic. That an LLM can talk to both code creators and end users and define requirements from those interviews, and document both the code base, the user docs, the service docs, the marketing docs, etc, and they can just get rid of the tech writers, marketing writers, graphic designers, usability designers, and the people that manage those teams. I mean, good luck with that.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • olafke@muenchen.socialO olafke@muenchen.social

                                    @tante unfortunately and increasingly, management is most interested in whatever looks good in PowerPoint rather than their product in the real world.

                                    missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    missconstrue@mefi.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #39

                                    @olafke @tante When the goal of every new company is to get purchased by a bigger company, end stage capitalism is eating itself.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • glyph@mastodon.socialG glyph@mastodon.social

                                      @tante yeah it's a real "YOU HAD ONE JOB" situation

                                      pathunstrom@ngmx.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pathunstrom@ngmx.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pathunstrom@ngmx.com
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #40

                                      @glyph @tante I'm literally the last MIS major at my college, we had to pull my course requirements from the school archives when it was time to graduate.

                                      Business as an industry was training people to have exactly that skill set, and then just stopped ~15 years ago.

                                      (Mostly, the position got replaced by analysts or data scientists as close as I can tell.)

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                        Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI". And it's kinda wild hearing their stories from the wild: Management is 100% in fantasy "AI" can do everything land and makes huge plans for how to use "AI" to cut workers when real projects that supposedly can do 50% of a specific task end up being able to do 8%. And they still go live. It's fucking bonkers. CEO's are really not okay.

                                        nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #41

                                        @tante Truly, they're the real problem behind all this... It never would have even reached this point without their complete inability to live inside reality due I suppose to the complete disconnect with the real world all that money seems to give them. The scam would have fallen short positively ages ago and it never even would have been pushed on people in the first place.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                          Spend the day talking to workers council members about "AI". And it's kinda wild hearing their stories from the wild: Management is 100% in fantasy "AI" can do everything land and makes huge plans for how to use "AI" to cut workers when real projects that supposedly can do 50% of a specific task end up being able to do 8%. And they still go live. It's fucking bonkers. CEO's are really not okay.

                                          reallylazybear@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          reallylazybear@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          reallylazybear@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #42

                                          @tante All in the name of "efficiency" and maximum profits. Number must go up up up! idk.

                                          What I do know is that CEO's are usually out of touch with reality, same with rich people as well.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups