Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. It's a Good Cloud Day.

It's a Good Cloud Day.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
74 Posts 50 Posters 23 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

    That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

    SpaceX is awful.

    shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    shiitaketoast@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
    shiitaketoast@beige.party
    wrote last edited by
    #61

    @sundogplanets what is the GHG factor of aluminum?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

      That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

      SpaceX is awful.

      hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
      hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
      hansbot@mastodon.green
      wrote last edited by
      #62

      @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

      sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

        That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

        SpaceX is awful.

        guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
        guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
        guillaumerossolini@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #63

        @sundogplanets as I understand it, it’s even worse

        https://youtu.be/iDaG4zt0NKc

        These alloys don’t vanish, their chemical components mix with the air, they keep floating high up and they cause changes

        /cc @keithdpatch

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • hansbot@mastodon.greenH hansbot@mastodon.green

          @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Now imagine having a million data centers in orbit, from musk alone. Before long, every few seconds a satellite will come down – with all its payload burning into the atmosphere

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
          sundogplanets@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #64

          @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

          hansbot@mastodon.greenH 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            @hansbot @mastodonmigration It's every 3 minutes for a million satellites with 5 year lifetimes 😭

            hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
            hansbot@mastodon.greenH This user is from outside of this forum
            hansbot@mastodon.green
            wrote last edited by
            #65

            @sundogplanets @mastodonmigration Yes. And it will likely not become a monopoly. Two competitors in the US, one in the EU, one in China, one in India, and it’s down to 2/min. To replace these, they would need a dozen or so launches per day, adding to the looming environmental disaster

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

              A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

              That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

              SpaceX is awful.

              nrmacdonald@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              nrmacdonald@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
              nrmacdonald@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #66

              @sundogplanets
              Being an old man, when you say v1 and v2 my first mental images are these.
              Whilst the effect of these are decidedly different in detail, their destructive nature is not.

              Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                @sundogplanets

                August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                #scifi

                karen5lund@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                karen5lund@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                karen5lund@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #67

                @albertcardona @sundogplanets Story downloaded. Calendar marked.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                  A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                  That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                  SpaceX is awful.

                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  chuckbenz@techhub.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #68

                  @sundogplanets any simple numbers yet to indicate whether Elon > Thomas Midgley Jr (leaded gas, cfcs) in terms of environmental impact? Or are we unwilling part of the experiment that will find out?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz

                    @sundogplanets

                    August 5, 2026 isn't that far away ...

                    "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury
                    https://www.btboces.org/Downloads/7_There%20Will%20Come%20Soft%20Rains%20by%20Ray%20Bradbury.pdf

                    #scifi

                    saguarolynx@c.imS This user is from outside of this forum
                    saguarolynx@c.imS This user is from outside of this forum
                    saguarolynx@c.im
                    wrote last edited by
                    #69

                    @sundogplanets @albertcardona

                    Ooh, this must be from the original edition of "The Martian Chronicles", published in 1950.

                    This past spring, we read & analyzed this story for a college writing course. Our version is set in the year 2057.

                    Wikipedia shows that the dates in the book, including this story, "advanced" by 31 years during the 1997 edition.

                    I first read this story on my own during high school (last decade of the Cold War).
                    It registered strongly then and still does so today!

                    8- )

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizzaL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lp0_on_fire@social.linux.pizza
                      wrote last edited by
                      #70

                      @lin11c @sundogplanets, well, given that they'll be burnt up on re-entry (entirely? If not, I can think of a few places where I'd like them to land), I don't think that they'll be in suitable condition to be sent back up…

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                        @albertcardona I think about this short story quite frequently, but haven't read it in years! I didn't realize there's an exact date in it! Wow.

                        hallvors@oslo.townH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hallvors@oslo.townH This user is from outside of this forum
                        hallvors@oslo.town
                        wrote last edited by
                        #71

                        @sundogplanets @albertcardona and I read it for the first time today, thanks for sharing

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                          A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                          That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                          SpaceX is awful.

                          django@social.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
                          django@social.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
                          django@social.coop
                          wrote last edited by
                          #72

                          @sundogplanets how are they even insurable? Who pays for KIS & property damage? Assuming they don’t have a mechanism to land safely… 😬

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                            A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                            That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                            SpaceX is awful.

                            seconduniverse@autistics.lifeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            seconduniverse@autistics.lifeS This user is from outside of this forum
                            seconduniverse@autistics.life
                            wrote last edited by
                            #73

                            @sundogplanets Move fast and break things. We'll fix the atmosphere in the next iteration. In fact, if we screw the atmosphere hard enough, they will pay us to fix it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                              A scary quick calculation: there are 10,375 Starlink satellites in orbit https://planet4589.org/space/con/conlist.html, all coming down within 5 years.

                              That's an *average* of 5 or 6 a day for the next 5 years. And the v2's are bigger than the v1's. v2's are (conservatively) 1000kg and (conservatively) half aluminum. That's 2.5-3 tonnes of aluminum per day. 8 times the natural infall rate of aluminum (and there's lots of other scary things like lithium). What will that do to our atmosphere?

                              SpaceX is awful.

                              krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                              krypt3ia@infosec.exchangeK This user is from outside of this forum
                              krypt3ia@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #74

                              @sundogplanets Big Kessler.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups