Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 🇩🇪US-Konzerne & Lobby-NGOs wollen unsere Chats scannen!

🇩🇪US-Konzerne & Lobby-NGOs wollen unsere Chats scannen!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
chatkontrolle
20 Posts 10 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

    🇩🇪US-Konzerne & Lobby-NGOs wollen unsere Chats scannen! 🛑 MORGEN (Tagesordnung) können wir die #Chatkontrolle endgültig killen!
    📧 Mails gehen unter.
    📞 ANRUFE wirken!

    Stoppt die Lobby, ruft JETZT Abgeordnete an: https://fightchatcontrol.de

    Faktencheck: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/entscheidungsschlacht-um-die-chatkontrolle-wie-eu-regierungen-und-tech-lobby-das-nein-des-eu-parlaments-kippen-wollen-der-grosse-faktencheck/

    lordcaramac@discordian.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    lordcaramac@discordian.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
    lordcaramac@discordian.social
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @echo_pbreyer Endgültig killen läßt die sich nicht, nur für diese Runde. In spätestens fünf Jahren kommt der nächste Anlauf. Das ist ein ewiger Kampf, bei dem wir jedesmal gewinnen müssen, denn wenn wir nur einmal verlieren, war es das.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

      🇪🇺US tech corps & lobby NGOs want to scan our chats! 🛑 TOMORROW (agenda vote) we can kill #ChatControl for good!
      📧 Emails are ignored.
      📞 CALLS work!

      Stop the lobby, call your MEPs NOW: https://fightchatcontrol.eu

      Fact check: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/the-battle-over-chat-control-how-eu-governments-and-the-tech-lobby-are-trying-to-overturn-parliaments-vote-a-comprehensive-fact-check/

      marceljan@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
      marceljan@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
      marceljan@mastodon.nl
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @echo_pbreyer Question: should you also call your MEPs if your country already votes against #chatcontrol ? Should you only call your country’s MEPs?

      digol@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • marceljan@mastodon.nlM marceljan@mastodon.nl

        @echo_pbreyer Question: should you also call your MEPs if your country already votes against #chatcontrol ? Should you only call your country’s MEPs?

        digol@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        digol@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
        digol@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @MarcelJan @echo_pbreyer I think you should also call them if your country is against chat control, the MEPs could have a different stance on the topic and if you can the MEPs from other countries also I think it would be nice

        marceljan@mastodon.nlM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • digol@mastodon.socialD digol@mastodon.social

          @MarcelJan @echo_pbreyer I think you should also call them if your country is against chat control, the MEPs could have a different stance on the topic and if you can the MEPs from other countries also I think it would be nice

          marceljan@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
          marceljan@mastodon.nlM This user is from outside of this forum
          marceljan@mastodon.nl
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @Digol @echo_pbreyer I just started to call some of the MEPs who are for Chatcontrol (and should know better). Not everyone is available, but I got in contact with the office of one of the Renew Europe members. They are really interested in my view on things. (With my IT security background)

          digol@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • marceljan@mastodon.nlM marceljan@mastodon.nl

            @Digol @echo_pbreyer I just started to call some of the MEPs who are for Chatcontrol (and should know better). Not everyone is available, but I got in contact with the office of one of the Renew Europe members. They are really interested in my view on things. (With my IT security background)

            digol@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            digol@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            digol@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @MarcelJan @echo_pbreyer oh, that's good! Good luck!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

              🇪🇺US tech corps & lobby NGOs want to scan our chats! 🛑 TOMORROW (agenda vote) we can kill #ChatControl for good!
              📧 Emails are ignored.
              📞 CALLS work!

              Stop the lobby, call your MEPs NOW: https://fightchatcontrol.eu

              Fact check: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/the-battle-over-chat-control-how-eu-governments-and-the-tech-lobby-are-trying-to-overturn-parliaments-vote-a-comprehensive-fact-check/

              staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
              staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
              staticr@guild.pmdcollab.org
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @echo_pbreyer Reading the last paragraph in your article makes me think a lot about fire safety.

              We don't do fire safety by continuing to build every building out of plywood and putting smoke detectors everywhere, we do it by not building our houses, furniture and stuff out of easily flammable material so fires are less likely to happen in the first place and if one still does break out, it won't destroy as much.

              Online safety must be done with a similar approach.

              staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS staticr@guild.pmdcollab.org

                @echo_pbreyer Reading the last paragraph in your article makes me think a lot about fire safety.

                We don't do fire safety by continuing to build every building out of plywood and putting smoke detectors everywhere, we do it by not building our houses, furniture and stuff out of easily flammable material so fires are less likely to happen in the first place and if one still does break out, it won't destroy as much.

                Online safety must be done with a similar approach.

                staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                staticr@guild.pmdcollab.org
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @echo_pbreyer Not to mention the fact that reporting is always AFTER the incident. Even if done automatically and instantaneously.

                A city of plywood and smoke alarms everywhere will always burn to the ground eventually because the firefighters were not able to respond fast enough one time. A city made of bricks can never do that.

                staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS staticr@guild.pmdcollab.org

                  @echo_pbreyer Not to mention the fact that reporting is always AFTER the incident. Even if done automatically and instantaneously.

                  A city of plywood and smoke alarms everywhere will always burn to the ground eventually because the firefighters were not able to respond fast enough one time. A city made of bricks can never do that.

                  staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  staticr@guild.pmdcollab.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                  staticr@guild.pmdcollab.org
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @echo_pbreyer In short:

                  Building an environment that is fundamentally safe by design will always be more safe and reliable than continuously policing an environment that is fundamentally unsafe.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.socialE echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social

                    🇪🇺US tech corps & lobby NGOs want to scan our chats! 🛑 TOMORROW (agenda vote) we can kill #ChatControl for good!
                    📧 Emails are ignored.
                    📞 CALLS work!

                    Stop the lobby, call your MEPs NOW: https://fightchatcontrol.eu

                    Fact check: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/the-battle-over-chat-control-how-eu-governments-and-the-tech-lobby-are-trying-to-overturn-parliaments-vote-a-comprehensive-fact-check/

                    xargon@livellosegreto.itX This user is from outside of this forum
                    xargon@livellosegreto.itX This user is from outside of this forum
                    xargon@livellosegreto.it
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @echo_pbreyer wasn't that already failed a couole weeks ago?
                    As I was noticed they completely closed that chapter back then?

                    digol@mastodon.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • xargon@livellosegreto.itX xargon@livellosegreto.it

                      @echo_pbreyer wasn't that already failed a couole weeks ago?
                      As I was noticed they completely closed that chapter back then?

                      digol@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      digol@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      digol@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @xargon @echo_pbreyer the negotiations between the Council and the Parliament failed and the EPP group took advantage and wanted another vote because they didn't like the result

                      xargon@livellosegreto.itX 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • digol@mastodon.socialD digol@mastodon.social

                        @xargon @echo_pbreyer the negotiations between the Council and the Parliament failed and the EPP group took advantage and wanted another vote because they didn't like the result

                        xargon@livellosegreto.itX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xargon@livellosegreto.itX This user is from outside of this forum
                        xargon@livellosegreto.it
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @Digol @echo_pbreyer damn, I am out of Europe now and I cannot call 😮‍💨

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups