Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Why are there so many articles about PLCs on the Internet where they specifically say they're vulnerable to attacks from Iran?

Why are there so many articles about PLCs on the Internet where they specifically say they're vulnerable to attacks from Iran?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
36 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange

    @cR0w Fair enough, but a) I suspect that's probably not universal and b) I rather suspect this is more targeted at higher-level, budget-deciding folks.

    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cr0w@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #10

    @nerdpr0f For sure. But it's so distracted boyfriend meme that it actually bugs me this time.

    nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

      @cR0w @nerdpr0f if my time working for Exelon was any indicator, the biggest PLC/ICS threat isn't nation-state actors, it was the vendors bringing in infected shit on their hardware.

      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
      cr0w@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #11

      @da_667 @nerdpr0f Not just their hardware, but their own entire domains with bullshit requirements.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

        @nerdpr0f For sure. But it's so distracted boyfriend meme that it actually bugs me this time.

        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
        nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #12

        @cR0w All the AI crap has really drove home to me that the entire tech industry is just the distracted boyfriend meme 24/7. All of it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        0
        • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

          @cR0w @nerdpr0f if my time working for Exelon was any indicator, the biggest PLC/ICS threat isn't nation-state actors, it was the vendors bringing in infected shit on their hardware.

          da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
          da_667@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #13

          @cR0w @nerdpr0f even more important than that for power generation and distribution, it was the wildlife and the climate that was a bigger threat than any of those things.

          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC gsuberland@chaos.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

            @cR0w @nerdpr0f if my time working for Exelon was any indicator, the biggest PLC/ICS threat isn't nation-state actors, it was the vendors bringing in infected shit on their hardware.

            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
            rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
            rootwyrm@weird.autos
            wrote last edited by
            #14

            @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f hey now, sometimes the vendors of the equipment attached to the PLC are the ones who bring in the infected shit.

            nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN da_667@infosec.exchangeD ryanb@infosec.exchangeR 3 Replies Last reply
            0
            • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

              @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f hey now, sometimes the vendors of the equipment attached to the PLC are the ones who bring in the infected shit.

              nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
              nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
              nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #15

              @rootwyrm @da_667 @cR0w Don't forget bad third party dependencies.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                @cR0w @nerdpr0f if my time working for Exelon was any indicator, the biggest PLC/ICS threat isn't nation-state actors, it was the vendors bringing in infected shit on their hardware.

                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                wrote last edited by
                #16

                @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f I mean I think the point was that this is a pattern observed in the past by specifically these actors, and that in this moment, it's worth reconsideration.

                Now granted, CISA does not cite their sources, but the claim was this exploitation was happening anew. And if it was similar to the CyberAv3ngers situation, they wouldn't be shy about claiming credit.

                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                  @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f hey now, sometimes the vendors of the equipment attached to the PLC are the ones who bring in the infected shit.

                  da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  da_667@infosec.exchange
                  wrote last edited by
                  #17

                  @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f that's exactly what I was saying. I was a part of an IR engagement where a gas generation plant had to go into manual mode because the vendor infected their server 2003 cluster and fucked operations there for weeks.

                  viss@mastodon.socialV 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                    @cR0w @nerdpr0f even more important than that for power generation and distribution, it was the wildlife and the climate that was a bigger threat than any of those things.

                    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cr0w@infosec.exchange
                    wrote last edited by
                    #18

                    @da_667 @nerdpr0f RIP cybersquirrel1

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                      @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f hey now, sometimes the vendors of the equipment attached to the PLC are the ones who bring in the infected shit.

                      ryanb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ryanb@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
                      ryanb@infosec.exchange
                      wrote last edited by
                      #19

                      @rootwyrm @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f Seen it.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                        @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f I mean I think the point was that this is a pattern observed in the past by specifically these actors, and that in this moment, it's worth reconsideration.

                        Now granted, CISA does not cite their sources, but the claim was this exploitation was happening anew. And if it was similar to the CyberAv3ngers situation, they wouldn't be shy about claiming credit.

                        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cr0w@infosec.exchange
                        wrote last edited by
                        #20

                        @mttaggart @da_667 @nerdpr0f CISA appears to no longer be any more than three DOGE kids in a trenchcoat with a pile of cocaine. I don't expect citations from them anymore as I don't hardly trust them anymore. We can discuss some of that elsewhere when I get my brain in that mode, but there has been so much advice from CISA that appears to just be "Grok, search for Iran and rehash something to make it sound current and relevant."

                        da_667@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                          @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f that's exactly what I was saying. I was a part of an IR engagement where a gas generation plant had to go into manual mode because the vendor infected their server 2003 cluster and fucked operations there for weeks.

                          viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                          viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                          viss@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #21

                          @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f

                          oh like target!
                          some hvac vendor came in and thats how they got all their registers infected.

                          yeah every time theres "big news"(tm) with nation state attackers everyone goes OH NO THEY CAN GO AFTER HYDRO AND POWER AND BANKS AND HOSPITALS

                          of course thats where they would go

                          all those verticals intentionally avoid security at nearly all cost all the time.

                          they're the lowest hanging fruit

                          viss@mastodon.socialV tim_lavoie@cosocial.caT 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • cr0w@infosec.exchangeC cr0w@infosec.exchange

                            @mttaggart @da_667 @nerdpr0f CISA appears to no longer be any more than three DOGE kids in a trenchcoat with a pile of cocaine. I don't expect citations from them anymore as I don't hardly trust them anymore. We can discuss some of that elsewhere when I get my brain in that mode, but there has been so much advice from CISA that appears to just be "Grok, search for Iran and rehash something to make it sound current and relevant."

                            da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                            da_667@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                            da_667@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #22

                            @cR0w @mttaggart @nerdpr0f

                            CISAs haunted

                            "what"

                            grabs cyber shotgun

                            CISAs haunted.

                            cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                              @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f

                              oh like target!
                              some hvac vendor came in and thats how they got all their registers infected.

                              yeah every time theres "big news"(tm) with nation state attackers everyone goes OH NO THEY CAN GO AFTER HYDRO AND POWER AND BANKS AND HOSPITALS

                              of course thats where they would go

                              all those verticals intentionally avoid security at nearly all cost all the time.

                              they're the lowest hanging fruit

                              viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              viss@mastodon.socialV This user is from outside of this forum
                              viss@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #23

                              @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f when i worked at sempra energy, one of the things i got to do was "vendor security reviews". that means doing assessments on shit rando business units wanted to buy or setup.

                              they would OPEN THE DISCUSSION with the phrase:

                              "tell me when youre done with your assessment, so we can file the risk acceptance forms".

                              meaning they had zero interest in the report, because they were gonna bypass it no matter what was in it

                              none@infosec.exchangeN B 2 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              0
                              • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                                @cR0w @mttaggart @nerdpr0f

                                CISAs haunted

                                "what"

                                grabs cyber shotgun

                                CISAs haunted.

                                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cr0w@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #24

                                @da_667 @mttaggart @nerdpr0f

                                Link Preview Image
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • viss@mastodon.socialV viss@mastodon.social

                                  @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f when i worked at sempra energy, one of the things i got to do was "vendor security reviews". that means doing assessments on shit rando business units wanted to buy or setup.

                                  they would OPEN THE DISCUSSION with the phrase:

                                  "tell me when youre done with your assessment, so we can file the risk acceptance forms".

                                  meaning they had zero interest in the report, because they were gonna bypass it no matter what was in it

                                  none@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  none@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  none@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #25

                                  @Viss @da_667 @rootwyrm @cR0w @nerdpr0f mandatory plug of https://youtu.be/9IG3zqvUqJY

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                    R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                                  • nerdpr0f@infosec.exchangeN nerdpr0f@infosec.exchange

                                    @cR0w Eh, that's just contextualizing to make the risk seem more immediate. Everyone is worried about Iran right now, so it makes sense for articles intended to increase anxiety to be oriented around them.

                                    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @nerdpr0f @cR0w Figuring the same, causality could be the other way around. Iran takes up a lot of collective {mind,news}space right now, leaving writers to think "oh Damn what could They possibly Do to Our Sacred Infrastructure". The leap isn't far to grab the next best thing, it just turns out a general vulnerability is prone to abuse from Iranian hackers as well

                                    multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloud

                                      @nerdpr0f @cR0w Figuring the same, causality could be the other way around. Iran takes up a lot of collective {mind,news}space right now, leaving writers to think "oh Damn what could They possibly Do to Our Sacred Infrastructure". The leap isn't far to grab the next best thing, it just turns out a general vulnerability is prone to abuse from Iranian hackers as well

                                      multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloudM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      multisn8@mastodon.catgirl.cloud
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #27

                                      @nerdpr0f @cR0w "their heinious foreign hacking" vs "our glorious protective FISA"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • da_667@infosec.exchangeD da_667@infosec.exchange

                                        @cR0w @nerdpr0f even more important than that for power generation and distribution, it was the wildlife and the climate that was a bigger threat than any of those things.

                                        gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        gsuberland@chaos.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f weather, wildlife, and human error. the movie scenarios of mass cyber attacks are nonsense. most of the "cyber" happening with ICS/SCADA environments comes down to regular ransomware shit and phishing. even in the marine sector the biggest threat was pirate groups sending fake emails claiming to be the coastguard or a port authority telling the captain to redirect into unprotected waters, so they could steal the vessel's fuel. it ain't sophisticated at all.

                                        cr0w@infosec.exchangeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                                          @da_667 @cR0w @nerdpr0f weather, wildlife, and human error. the movie scenarios of mass cyber attacks are nonsense. most of the "cyber" happening with ICS/SCADA environments comes down to regular ransomware shit and phishing. even in the marine sector the biggest threat was pirate groups sending fake emails claiming to be the coastguard or a port authority telling the captain to redirect into unprotected waters, so they could steal the vessel's fuel. it ain't sophisticated at all.

                                          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cr0w@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          cr0w@infosec.exchange
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #29

                                          @gsuberland @da_667 @nerdpr0f I'm with you but you have to add the shitty firewall vulns in there in recent years too with ransomware and phishing.

                                          gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups