Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. @paco @BenAveling it is just a stupid electronic device

@paco @BenAveling it is just a stupid electronic device

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
597 Posts 265 Posters 303 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • deafferret@flyovercountry.socialD deafferret@flyovercountry.social

    @paco

    Now people who know very little in a domain feel like they can skip learning that domain and just make a personal tool with an LLM that will meet their needs.

    That's what I do with 99% of the objects in my life? Everyone does? I have almost zero knowledge of how my clothes and car and house and prescription drugs are manufactured. I just use them and focus on what I happen to do for a job (computer programming).

    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
    paco@infosec.exchange
    wrote on last edited by
    #322

    @deafferret I think you missed the point. You don’t MAKE car, house, clothes, or drugs. And you don’t think you can, either. You use the ones others make.

    But people think they can use an LLM to make software, when they’ve never done that before. And not just any software, but software in a domain where they have only cursory knowledge.

    Like a person who has never designed a game and has never made a mobile app (and maybe has never written code at all) thinks they can use an LLM to make a mobile game.

    If you said you could use an LLM to make your own prescription drugs, when you’re a software developer by trade, then you’d be like these non-programmers who think they can write software now that they have an LLM.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • johnjburnsiii@kzoo.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johnjburnsiii@kzoo.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
      johnjburnsiii@kzoo.to
      wrote on last edited by
      #323

      @paco

      Does "productive work" also mean: accurate work?

      🤔

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tg_esq@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
        tg_esq@mastodon.onlineT This user is from outside of this forum
        tg_esq@mastodon.online
        wrote on last edited by
        #324

        @paco
        Bluesky asked me to give my ID information and documents to a third party provider when Australia introduced its under-16 ban a month or two ago.

        I deleted Bluesky.

        f4grx@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sinux@piaille.frS This user is from outside of this forum
          sinux@piaille.frS This user is from outside of this forum
          sinux@piaille.fr
          wrote on last edited by
          #325

          @elaine @paco how is it winning if you have to rely on the G.A.F.A.M.? That's against the ideology a lot of Linux users agree with.
          But yeah, I agree with you that it should be a client-side standard (if possible) that would not use third-party online services and break privacy.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • troed@swecyb.comT This user is from outside of this forum
            troed@swecyb.comT This user is from outside of this forum
            troed@swecyb.com
            wrote on last edited by
            #326

            @paco No one should let anyone get away with "third party". Your subcontractor - you own it, just as if it had been your own employees. Don't like it? Don't outsource your responsibilities.

            oscherler@tooting.chO 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
              theorangetheme@en.osm.townT This user is from outside of this forum
              theorangetheme@en.osm.town
              wrote on last edited by
              #327

              @paco Yet another reason in the litany of reasons I refuse to join Discord. People need to like... stop... using it.

              rolfbly@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • retrosponge@kind.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                retrosponge@kind.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                retrosponge@kind.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #328

                @paco Fucking hell 🙄

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                  michael@westergaard.social
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #329
                  No they didn’t. They did their own age verification and stored images of passports in Zendesk (iirc, or some other support desk software). Discord acted completely irresponsibly and discord NEEDS age verification due to their young target audience and child enthusiast problem. I agree with your point, but your representation of what happened at Discord is entirely wrong.
                  michael@westergaard.socialM paco@infosec.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • michael@westergaard.socialM michael@westergaard.social
                    No they didn’t. They did their own age verification and stored images of passports in Zendesk (iirc, or some other support desk software). Discord acted completely irresponsibly and discord NEEDS age verification due to their young target audience and child enthusiast problem. I agree with your point, but your representation of what happened at Discord is entirely wrong.
                    michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    michael@westergaard.social
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #330
                    Yes, I remembered correctly: it was zendesk. youtube.com/watch?v=GbXATeFfkRA
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • damiano_chech@techhub.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      damiano_chech@techhub.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      damiano_chech@techhub.social
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #331

                      @paco Damn, this is both hilarious and terrifying. 70,000 people handed over their documents so Discord could “verify their age,” and now all those files are just floating around the internet. Does anyone really think this is safe?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tuxonbike@norden.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tuxonbike@norden.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                        tuxonbike@norden.social
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #332

                        @paco “At Discord, protecting the privacy and security of our users is a top priority.” says the service without e2ee for direct messages.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                          elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                          elbeetoots@mastodon.nl
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #333

                          @paco Well, you know, at least that company knows how to NOT safely store sensitive personal data...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT theorangetheme@en.osm.town

                            @paco Yet another reason in the litany of reasons I refuse to join Discord. People need to like... stop... using it.

                            rolfbly@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rolfbly@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rolfbly@mastodon.social
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #334

                            @theorangetheme @paco

                            I had to ask something on a discord forum about this app I use.

                            The tone of voice is of teens on the loose.

                            While it's ok & just fine to be a teen on the loose (I've been one myself, and looking back I firmly believe it's a fundamental human right to do really dumb things), COMMA, it's, well, a state of mind I left behind. Mostly. I think. I hope.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ki@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              ki@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              ki@chaos.social
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #335

                              @elaine @paco
                              So... your idea of data security is to give even more user data to these companies with too much power that we'd love to burn to the ground? (metaphorically) The very same companies that feed every piece of data they can get their hands on into LLMs?

                              shinspiegel@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tg_esq@mastodon.onlineT tg_esq@mastodon.online

                                @paco
                                Bluesky asked me to give my ID information and documents to a third party provider when Australia introduced its under-16 ban a month or two ago.

                                I deleted Bluesky.

                                f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                                f4grx@chaos.social
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #336

                                @TG_Esq @paco way to go!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paco@infosec.exchange
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #337

                                  @kerfuffle Is it worth highlighting? I mean, admitting that it happened is surely the lowest possible expectation. Do we pat them on the back and give them a participation trophy? In some jurisdictions, this disclosure is mandated by law (which is why these laws are good). Is it worth mentioning that they chose to do what the law said they must?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • michael@westergaard.socialM michael@westergaard.social
                                    No they didn’t. They did their own age verification and stored images of passports in Zendesk (iirc, or some other support desk software). Discord acted completely irresponsibly and discord NEEDS age verification due to their young target audience and child enthusiast problem. I agree with your point, but your representation of what happened at Discord is entirely wrong.
                                    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    paco@infosec.exchange
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #338

                                    @michael Was it Zendesk? Someone else replied that it was 5CA and sent this link

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Holding statement regarding Security Incident

                                    We are aware of a recent security incident. Learn how 5CA is responding and protecting client and community data.

                                    favicon

                                    5CA (5ca.com)

                                    The phrase “our vendor used to review age-related appeals” in the discord disclosure made it sound like the vendor did the appeals. So maybe discord did the initial verification, but this vendor was doing more than just storing images.

                                    michael@westergaard.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • curiously@mastodon.auC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      curiously@mastodon.auC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      curiously@mastodon.au
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #339

                                      @paco inevitable.
                                      Too good a target of course this happened and will keep happening. Waiting for the big one that makes photo ID worthless.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • paco@infosec.exchangeP paco@infosec.exchange

                                        @michael Was it Zendesk? Someone else replied that it was 5CA and sent this link

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Holding statement regarding Security Incident

                                        We are aware of a recent security incident. Learn how 5CA is responding and protecting client and community data.

                                        favicon

                                        5CA (5ca.com)

                                        The phrase “our vendor used to review age-related appeals” in the discord disclosure made it sound like the vendor did the appeals. So maybe discord did the initial verification, but this vendor was doing more than just storing images.

                                        michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        michael@westergaard.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        michael@westergaard.social
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #340
                                        Then I might have been wrong and there were more leaks. They definitely had one last year, where they hosted pictures of peoples' passports in Zendesk (which is all kinds of insane).

                                        If they used a "proper" age verification service and they leaked, that's an entire new can of worms. (Though I still think Discord in particular having age verification is not a bad thing.)
                                        michael@westergaard.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • lazysupper@famichiki.jpL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lazysupper@famichiki.jpL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lazysupper@famichiki.jp
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #341

                                          @paco
                                          When I logged back into LinkedIn a few a months ago (after years of blissful absence) it asked me to "verify" my identity. So I click "ugh, fine" and got redirected to a 3rd party asking for all of my personal info. lol. that was a quick "Cancel".

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups