Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. @paco @BenAveling it is just a stupid electronic device

@paco @BenAveling it is just a stupid electronic device

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
597 Posts 265 Posters 315 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
    ramsey@phpc.social
    wrote on last edited by
    #264

    @paco @dotmeow There’s the up-front costs for getting the gTLD, but then it’s something like USD $25k per year to maintain, isn’t it? Is the group setting up something for recurring donations, or will the cost of registrations/renewals cover the regular ICANN fees and infrastructure costs?

    ramsey@phpc.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ramsey@phpc.socialR ramsey@phpc.social

      @paco @dotmeow There’s the up-front costs for getting the gTLD, but then it’s something like USD $25k per year to maintain, isn’t it? Is the group setting up something for recurring donations, or will the cost of registrations/renewals cover the regular ICANN fees and infrastructure costs?

      ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      ramsey@phpc.social
      wrote on last edited by
      #265

      @paco @dotmeow I do like how they’re planning to funnel the profits directly into queer community causes, though. Best of luck to them!

      ramsey@phpc.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ramsey@phpc.socialR ramsey@phpc.social

        @paco @dotmeow I do like how they’re planning to funnel the profits directly into queer community causes, though. Best of luck to them!

        ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        ramsey@phpc.social
        wrote on last edited by
        #266

        @paco @dotmeow I just backed them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • paco@infosec.exchangeP paco@infosec.exchange

          @godofbiscuits Great. So at least we're on the same wavelength.

          I don't want to provoke irritation in (or support a project that irritates) the very people I want to support. Perhaps what you're saying is that this is going to have low appeal to people who themselves are part of the LGBTQ community? I can understand that.

          But is it bad? Is there a reason that well-intentioned folks like me should oppose it instead of support it? Is it more offensive than beneficial? I'm genuinely asking.

          godofbiscuits@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          godofbiscuits@sfba.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          godofbiscuits@sfba.social
          wrote on last edited by
          #267

          @paco you could just donate to LGBTQ causes directly.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • feld@friedcheese.usF This user is from outside of this forum
            feld@friedcheese.usF This user is from outside of this forum
            feld@friedcheese.us
            wrote on last edited by
            #268
            @paco @dotmeow they know it's gonna cost them $25k every year just to keep the TLD active, right?

            $6,450 per quarter ($25,800/year)
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dymaxion@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
              dymaxion@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
              dymaxion@infosec.exchange
              wrote on last edited by
              #269

              @tiotasram
              So, the claim with SGX is that if you trust intel to have done the implementation right and not have their keys compromised, then you can know the hash of the code that's running on the server and that that code is isolated from the rest of the OS and firmware. With open source server code and reproducible builds, you can then confirm that the server is running the code inside the enclave that it should be, and with ends to end encryption between you and the enclave (and keys held inside the enclave), that nothing in between you and the enclave has touched it. It's a good model, with two problems: the SGX code has to talk to the GPU and somehow keep all of that interaction inside the trust zone of the enclave, and intel and Nvidia need to have done their jobs correctly. The fact that they don't mention encrypted GPU memory etc. is the first big red flag for me. Even with that, though, SGX has had a lot of bugs over the years, and by most accounts Nvidia's attempts at GPU enclaves are much less secure.
              @paco

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • floatybirb@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                floatybirb@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                floatybirb@mastodon.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #270

                @paco Other things being equal I prefer a mix of genders on a planet.

                paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • davidculley@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davidculley@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                  davidculley@hachyderm.io
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #271

                  @paco https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/115888276811158389

                  paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • floatybirb@mastodon.socialF floatybirb@mastodon.social

                    @paco Other things being equal I prefer a mix of genders on a planet.

                    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paco@infosec.exchange
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #272

                    @floatybirb agreed. Now, if you asked me whether I would want to live on a planet that was governed by all women or governed by all men, I’d pick all women every time. But population? Yeah. Variety is better.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • davidculley@hachyderm.ioD davidculley@hachyderm.io

                      @paco https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall/115888276811158389

                      paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                      paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                      paco@infosec.exchange
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #273

                      @davidculley I remember the stupid cryptocurrency thing, but I didn’t realise Moxie was driving that or that it led to him leaving Signal. I didn’t pay close enough attention. It all fits a bit better now.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        gsuberland@chaos.social
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #274

                        @paco this goes beyond basic compute resources and is also applied to user attention and familiarity. things get changed constantly because the developers think a new design is better, without attaching any cost to user discomfort and the time/energy it takes to relearn the new way, or the time/energy that needed to be invested in learning the previous way.

                        modern Linux is rapidly following the same trajectory, unfortunately. in terms of sane alternatives we're basically left with the BSDs.

                        paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tamonten@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tamonten@mstdn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          tamonten@mstdn.social
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #275

                          @paco Just checked and there’s still missing pictures on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cetaceans that are worth checking out.
                          (Beaked whales)

                          paco@infosec.exchangeP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tamonten@mstdn.socialT tamonten@mstdn.social

                            @paco Just checked and there’s still missing pictures on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cetaceans that are worth checking out.
                            (Beaked whales)

                            paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                            paco@infosec.exchange
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #276

                            @tamonten 😃 That was the inspiration for this.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mikalai@privacysafe.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mikalai@privacysafe.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mikalai@privacysafe.social
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #277

                              @paco
                              This is a good perspective. 💯
                              Hm. In unix/linux I feel in control. Windows? For myself I try to avoid Windows out of self-respect.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gsuberland@chaos.socialG gsuberland@chaos.social

                                @paco this goes beyond basic compute resources and is also applied to user attention and familiarity. things get changed constantly because the developers think a new design is better, without attaching any cost to user discomfort and the time/energy it takes to relearn the new way, or the time/energy that needed to be invested in learning the previous way.

                                modern Linux is rapidly following the same trajectory, unfortunately. in terms of sane alternatives we're basically left with the BSDs.

                                paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paco@infosec.exchange
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #278

                                @gsuberland I agree. And related to that, people often talk about liking Windows because of familiarity. Part of the argument is that using Windows at home and at work probably makes people better in both places. Frankly (a) I think the average person is less familiar than they think they are (Dunning-Krueger), and (b) this point you make: Microsoft is frequently taking actions that make one less familiar with Windows than they were.

                                gsuberland@chaos.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • paco@infosec.exchangeP paco@infosec.exchange

                                  @gsuberland I agree. And related to that, people often talk about liking Windows because of familiarity. Part of the argument is that using Windows at home and at work probably makes people better in both places. Frankly (a) I think the average person is less familiar than they think they are (Dunning-Krueger), and (b) this point you make: Microsoft is frequently taking actions that make one less familiar with Windows than they were.

                                  gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gsuberland@chaos.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gsuberland@chaos.social
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #279

                                  @paco I personally use it because it can run the things I want to run, and Linux can't do that. for everything else, I'm on FreeBSD.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • klu9@ohai.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    klu9@ohai.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                    klu9@ohai.social
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #280

                                    @paco

                                    Added to my wishlist!

                                    #KungFuMovies #WongKarwai #TonyLeungChiuwai

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ramsey@phpc.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ramsey@phpc.social
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #281

                                      @paco butts in racks

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dl@indieweb.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dl@indieweb.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        dl@indieweb.social
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #282

                                        @paco I know that 98%🐬 of people agree with this message.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • arrjay@tacobelllabs.netA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          arrjay@tacobelllabs.netA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          arrjay@tacobelllabs.net
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #283

                                          @paco "Hubris Generator" has a good ring to it...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups