2026 in a nutshell:
-
2026 in a nutshell:
"The richest man on Earth killed the poorest children."
Another reason we should get rid of the super rich, one way or another
@stux When 3.5 billion people are in poverty it is insane to have millionaires and obscene to have billionaires.
Until we can start to address gigantic and growing inequalities, the human race is doomed.
-
2026 in a nutshell:
"The richest man on Earth killed the poorest children."
Another reason we should get rid of the super rich, one way or another
@stux The longer this goes on the more I lean toward “or another”
-
@stux And absolutely the singular reason no one should ever buy any of his products ever again.
Don't use Twitter.
Don't buy a Tesla.
Don't pay for StarLink.
Don't use Tesla chargers or Powerwall batteries.
The man is a stain on humanity, and unless we all stop giving him our money, he will continue to get rich off of us, and stay protected against his actions - even when those actions kill millions.
At what point will the term "mass murderer" finally stick to this asshole?
-
2026 in a nutshell:
"The richest man on Earth killed the poorest children."
Another reason we should get rid of the super rich, one way or another
@stux Replace #TechBros and #FossilFuels leaders with leading #RootInfrastructure #scientists.
-
2026 in a nutshell:
"The richest man on Earth killed the poorest children."
Another reason we should get rid of the super rich, one way or another
While I'm no fan of wealth inequality, I'm also not going to sit here and pretend I want to get rid of Mackenzie Scott, who has donated billions of dollars to great causes, including becoming the single largest donor to historically black colleges (HBCUs).
I'll take generous billionaires over racist, bigoted, working class MAGA voters, who elected a guy that promised the bloody deportation of a million immigrants, any day of the week.
-
I know i am an old, cranky, reply guy type of guy
but I don't see how you can accuse anyone of a truly vile crime - murdering children - without a reliable link@failedLyndonLaRouchite @stux
In every region, wealthy individuals invest in assets like stocks, real estate, and businesses. These assets generate high returns over time, multiplying existing wealth. While the cost of living rises, lower-income wages often remain flat. This reduces the actual purchasing power of the poor. Price increases on essential goods (food, rent) consume a larger percentage of a poor household's income than a rich household's income. -
2026 in a nutshell:
"The richest man on Earth killed the poorest children."
Another reason we should get rid of the super rich, one way or another
-
@aadeacon We could solve one issue with the other!
77 million people voted for this and another 90 million stayed home because both sides are the same. I can assure you that the majority of people supporting these atrocities are not wealthy, they're just bigoted, racist, lowlifes.
"It was not Hitler or Himmler who abducted me, beat me and shot my family. It was the shoemaker, the milkman, the neighbor, who received a uniform and then believed they were the master race."— Karl Stojka (Auschwitz survivor)
-
@failedLyndonLaRouchite @stux
In every region, wealthy individuals invest in assets like stocks, real estate, and businesses. These assets generate high returns over time, multiplying existing wealth. While the cost of living rises, lower-income wages often remain flat. This reduces the actual purchasing power of the poor. Price increases on essential goods (food, rent) consume a larger percentage of a poor household's income than a rich household's income.your reply raises so many complex questions, that I am unable to know if I agree or disagree
for instance, if we look at extreme poverty, there has been a huge global decrease (decrease) over the past 50 years
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-evolution-of-global-poverty-1990-2030/In the US, real (inflation adjusted) median household income has gone up a lot since 1984
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N -
your reply raises so many complex questions, that I am unable to know if I agree or disagree
for instance, if we look at extreme poverty, there has been a huge global decrease (decrease) over the past 50 years
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-evolution-of-global-poverty-1990-2030/In the US, real (inflation adjusted) median household income has gone up a lot since 1984
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672Nhowever, what is true is that while real incomes are growing, a larger percent of the pie is going to the rich, that is a very real thing
-
however, what is true is that while real incomes are growing, a larger percent of the pie is going to the rich, that is a very real thing
@failedLyndonLaRouchite @stux
I enjoy our positive rapport.
-
2026 in a nutshell:
"The richest man on Earth killed the poorest children."
Another reason we should get rid of the super rich, one way or another
Billionaires need to go.
I no longer care how. -
77 million people voted for this and another 90 million stayed home because both sides are the same. I can assure you that the majority of people supporting these atrocities are not wealthy, they're just bigoted, racist, lowlifes.
"It was not Hitler or Himmler who abducted me, beat me and shot my family. It was the shoemaker, the milkman, the neighbor, who received a uniform and then believed they were the master race."— Karl Stojka (Auschwitz survivor)
@HakeemG @stux I did not get a vote this year. Due to Local government reorganisation our elections were put back a year.This gives the Labour/Cooperative party* in my local wards a year to a0disociate themselves from Starmer and b)make the case to vote Labour/cooperative on the results of the current,Lab/Coop. council
* Truth in tooting, I am a member of both parties/
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
for it to make any difference in his abominable existence 
