“A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication.
-
“A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication. The journal publisher, Springer Nature, cited “discrepancies” in the analysis and a lack of confidence in the conclusions—but not before the paper racked up hundreds of citations and made the rounds on social media.”
Influential study touting ChatGPT in education retracted over red flags
The retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times.
Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)
-
“A study that claimed OpenAI’s ChatGPT can positively impact student learning has been retracted nearly one year after publication. The journal publisher, Springer Nature, cited “discrepancies” in the analysis and a lack of confidence in the conclusions—but not before the paper racked up hundreds of citations and made the rounds on social media.”
Influential study touting ChatGPT in education retracted over red flags
The retracted study on ChatGPT in education was already cited hundreds of times.
Ars Technica (arstechnica.com)
@gregeganSF In cases like these, a retraction feels not unlike closing the barn door after the entire herd has already fled.
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
