Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. #Deepfakes are everywhere, but #DigitalForensics investigators are fighting back:

#Deepfakes are everywhere, but #DigitalForensics investigators are fighting back:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
deepfakesdigitalforensic
116 Posts 81 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mansr@society.oftrolls.comM mansr@society.oftrolls.com

    @nCrazed @leah @f4grx @FabMusacchio If the light source is behind the image plane, these lines will of course converge at an opposite point. The important part is that they all converge. If they intersect every which way, something funny is going on.

    f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    f4grx@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #39

    @mansr @nCrazed @leah @FabMusacchio yep I agree with that remark, modulo lens distortions. I would love to see the actual convergence on a known good image, for comparison sake.

    leah@blahaj.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

      @mansr @nCrazed @leah @FabMusacchio yep I agree with that remark, modulo lens distortions. I would love to see the actual convergence on a known good image, for comparison sake.

      leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      leah@blahaj.social
      wrote last edited by
      #40

      @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio I tried it on two random hallway images from Kagi Search and it worked great. I think most lens distortions are nonlinear, so the problem is rather that the lines are not straight than that they won't meet.

      f4grx@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • leah@blahaj.socialL leah@blahaj.social

        @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio I tried it on two random hallway images from Kagi Search and it worked great. I think most lens distortions are nonlinear, so the problem is rather that the lines are not straight than that they won't meet.

        f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        f4grx@chaos.social
        wrote last edited by
        #41

        @leah @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio How do you model the curvatures of these non straight lines so you can be sure that they all meet at the same point? 🤔

        leah@blahaj.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

          @leah @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio How do you model the curvatures of these non straight lines so you can be sure that they all meet at the same point? 🤔

          leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          leah@blahaj.social
          wrote last edited by
          #42

          @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio I didn't need to, since the lines were straight I assumed lens correction was already done or not necessary.

          funkylab@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • fabmusacchio@mastodon.socialF fabmusacchio@mastodon.social

            #Deepfakes are everywhere, but #DigitalForensics investigators are fighting back:

            🌍 https://scim.ag/42dMPBg

            octaviaconamore@cutie.cityO This user is from outside of this forum
            octaviaconamore@cutie.cityO This user is from outside of this forum
            octaviaconamore@cutie.city
            wrote last edited by
            #43

            @FabMusacchio @Jenetrix I feel like I'm in a Realism 101 illustration class

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ncrazed@fd00.spaceN ncrazed@fd00.space

              @leah @f4grx @FabMusacchio yeah, I think that's a fair criticism 🤔

              songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS This user is from outside of this forum
              songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS This user is from outside of this forum
              songxisto@icosahedron.website
              wrote last edited by
              #44

              @nCrazed @leah @f4grx @FabMusacchio Sunrays are quasi-parallel in the 3rd dimension, however they all diverge from the sun when projected on a surface such as a camera sensor or our retina. What difference does it make if the trick works with lamps too ? The sun is just a big, faraway lamp, and the rules of convergence in 2d spaces apply just the same for all 1d-ish lightsources.

              The trick works if you don't mind for lens distortion, which are really minor on most smartphone cameras nowadays (do not mess lens distortion with surface distortion caused by planar projection on sensors, the latter doesn't affect convergence even though it can exxagerate surfaces on the sides of the pic).

              leah@blahaj.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • leah@blahaj.socialL leah@blahaj.social

                @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio I didn't need to, since the lines were straight I assumed lens correction was already done or not necessary.

                funkylab@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                funkylab@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                funkylab@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #45

                @leah agreed, I just wished the technique they described came with that as a warning, because the (obviously generated, "read" the uniform patches) hallway picture shown would be a *prime* candidate for taking with a fisheye lens or a similarly distorting lens; and the piece of flooring used to extrapolate the straight lines is already honestly too short in the example to be sure. I cannot, over the length of maybe 50px, draw a 1000px line with < 1° error.

                @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio

                funkylab@mastodon.socialF P f4grx@chaos.socialF 3 Replies Last reply
                0
                • funkylab@mastodon.socialF funkylab@mastodon.social

                  @leah agreed, I just wished the technique they described came with that as a warning, because the (obviously generated, "read" the uniform patches) hallway picture shown would be a *prime* candidate for taking with a fisheye lens or a similarly distorting lens; and the piece of flooring used to extrapolate the straight lines is already honestly too short in the example to be sure. I cannot, over the length of maybe 50px, draw a 1000px line with < 1° error.

                  @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio

                  funkylab@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  funkylab@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  funkylab@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #46

                  @leah (and of course, a photojournalist in a government building is more likely to have a "low distortion as possible" lens equipped than a fishlens, but if you're preparing for e.g. reporting from a small, crowded room and want to get as many interacting politicians into the picture as possible, you'd not go in there with a superzoom lens alone. And if a picture is claimed to be from a publicity shot, the photographer certainly will pick from a wide range)

                  @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS songxisto@icosahedron.website

                    @nCrazed @leah @f4grx @FabMusacchio Sunrays are quasi-parallel in the 3rd dimension, however they all diverge from the sun when projected on a surface such as a camera sensor or our retina. What difference does it make if the trick works with lamps too ? The sun is just a big, faraway lamp, and the rules of convergence in 2d spaces apply just the same for all 1d-ish lightsources.

                    The trick works if you don't mind for lens distortion, which are really minor on most smartphone cameras nowadays (do not mess lens distortion with surface distortion caused by planar projection on sensors, the latter doesn't affect convergence even though it can exxagerate surfaces on the sides of the pic).

                    leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    leah@blahaj.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    leah@blahaj.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #47

                    @songxisto @nCrazed @f4grx @FabMusacchio Assume a solid cube on a plane, and only parallel, ambient light hits it from an angle. if you connect the cube corners with the three visible shadow-corners, the lines are parallel as well and won't intersect. am i wrong?

                    songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • leah@blahaj.socialL leah@blahaj.social

                      @songxisto @nCrazed @f4grx @FabMusacchio Assume a solid cube on a plane, and only parallel, ambient light hits it from an angle. if you connect the cube corners with the three visible shadow-corners, the lines are parallel as well and won't intersect. am i wrong?

                      songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS This user is from outside of this forum
                      songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS This user is from outside of this forum
                      songxisto@icosahedron.website
                      wrote last edited by
                      #48

                      @leah @nCrazed @f4grx @FabMusacchio You are right if the image is itself a parallel projection, but the images from cameras are perspectives, where parallel rays/lines in 3d always converge somewhere (except rays/lines parallel to the sensor).

                      Link Preview Image
                      f4grx@chaos.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • fabmusacchio@mastodon.socialF fabmusacchio@mastodon.social

                        #Deepfakes are everywhere, but #DigitalForensics investigators are fighting back:

                        🌍 https://scim.ag/42dMPBg

                        nihilarc@skastodon.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nihilarc@skastodon.comN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nihilarc@skastodon.com
                        wrote last edited by
                        #49

                        @FabMusacchio to be fair, the first one the perspective doesn't 100% mean it's fake. It could be that some builder somewhere did a shite job of the tiling.

                        walrus@toot.walesW viraptor@cyberplace.socialV 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • funkylab@mastodon.socialF funkylab@mastodon.social

                          @leah agreed, I just wished the technique they described came with that as a warning, because the (obviously generated, "read" the uniform patches) hallway picture shown would be a *prime* candidate for taking with a fisheye lens or a similarly distorting lens; and the piece of flooring used to extrapolate the straight lines is already honestly too short in the example to be sure. I cannot, over the length of maybe 50px, draw a 1000px line with < 1° error.

                          @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio

                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          phosphenes@glasgow.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #50

                          @funkylab @leah @f4grx @mansr @nCrazed @FabMusacchio

                          Also I have seen floors where the tiles were not parallel to the walls because of sloppy work.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • audecaussarieu@social.sciences.reA audecaussarieu@social.sciences.re

                            Ah bah voilà une super source d'exos d'optique géométrique 😅

                            tellington@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tellington@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                            tellington@eldritch.cafe
                            wrote last edited by
                            #51

                            @AudeCaussarieu oh wow faut que je bosse avec des profs de maths pour faire des séances maths / éducation aux médias !

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • songxisto@icosahedron.websiteS songxisto@icosahedron.website

                              @leah @nCrazed @f4grx @FabMusacchio You are right if the image is itself a parallel projection, but the images from cameras are perspectives, where parallel rays/lines in 3d always converge somewhere (except rays/lines parallel to the sensor).

                              Link Preview Image
                              f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                              f4grx@chaos.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #52

                              @songxisto @leah @nCrazed @FabMusacchio Yep. you can see the difference in freecad by switching between parallel projection and perspective.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • fabmusacchio@mastodon.socialF fabmusacchio@mastodon.social

                                #Deepfakes are everywhere, but #DigitalForensics investigators are fighting back:

                                🌍 https://scim.ag/42dMPBg

                                lps@mograph.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lps@mograph.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                                lps@mograph.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #53

                                @FabMusacchio thanks for reposting, these are great tips to help spot fakes:) it's getting incredibly hard, if not impossible lately: (

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • xauriel@mastodon.nzX xauriel@mastodon.nz

                                  @FabMusacchio it is really telling that one of the most powerful tools to detect fake images is an artistic tool that any first year art school student knows about

                                  martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  martinvermeer@fediscience.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  martinvermeer@fediscience.org
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #54

                                  @XauriEL @FabMusacchio Yep. GenAI doesn't _understand_ anything - like 3D geometry - it just knows a lot of patterns. The same holds for LLMs. The way to test is to look for understanding, or the lack of it.

                                  Like this

                                  https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:jdgad3rwwpboirmdcqx4qqvm/post/3mjs54ulm622n

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mourioche@mastodon.socialM mourioche@mastodon.social

                                    @mathieu_ @AudeCaussarieu Je mets ma main au feu que les IA génératives savent déjà le faire, si on leur demande dans le prompt 🙄

                                    On va surement en arriver au même résultat que pour la presse ou la télévision : La confiance dans le média sera lié à la réputation du média et à rien d'autre...

                                    gfadrelle@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gfadrelle@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gfadrelle@mamot.fr
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #55

                                    @Mourioche bah j'avais vu une vidéo sur la musique généré par IA où on disait que le gros problème c'était que l'IA n'arrive pas à reconstituer les pistes/instrument et manipule le bazar comme un tout, et forcément qqn d'exercé arrivait à repérer des étrangeté dans les sons et la stéréo.

                                    C'est le même problème pour la géométrie, vu qu'on crée l'image comme un tout, sans "calque" (qui permet de limiter ce genre de couilles en structurant les plans)

                                    @mathieu_ @AudeCaussarieu

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • fabmusacchio@mastodon.socialF fabmusacchio@mastodon.social

                                      #Deepfakes are everywhere, but #DigitalForensics investigators are fighting back:

                                      🌍 https://scim.ag/42dMPBg

                                      aearo@dragon.styleA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      aearo@dragon.styleA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      aearo@dragon.style
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #56

                                      @FabMusacchio

                                      Ooooh - what I like about this is, unlike a lot of "here's how you spot this stuff" advice, these seem like maybe things AI-generated images will have a *very* hard time ever getting consistently right.

                                      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ragon2@mstdn.socialR ragon2@mstdn.social

                                        @FabMusacchio Great to have a sure way to prove things, but honestly, just zoom in on details see if they're coherent? In most if not any genai image? Not even talking about the dinausore/crocodile one because if you're under 50 you could tell in one blink

                                        alexcorby@indieauthors.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        alexcorby@indieauthors.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        alexcorby@indieauthors.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #57

                                        @Ragon2 @FabMusacchio I also get immediately suspicious if the image in the foreground is crystal clear, high definition, yet anything just slightly in the background is completely blurry (image 2).

                                        Another tell is when I see people looking a little too uniform (soldier picture) and invariably all white. I'm also confused about all the chains they're wearing. Are they escorting themselves to a prison barracks? Except that one on the right with the chain trailing off screen. I assume he's taking his Labrador for a walk.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                                          @microblogc @FabMusacchio Forced perspective is your friend: "The Potemkin Stairs in Odesa extend for 142 metres, but give the illusion of greater depth since the stairs are wider at the bottom than at the top."

                                          gfadrelle@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gfadrelle@mamot.frG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gfadrelle@mamot.fr
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #58

                                          @Mabande and the usage of trees that remove all other reference points ^^ @microblogc @FabMusacchio

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups