i do not want to get into the business of posting LLM takes but very briefly:
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk To me, 'sad' is the right word. We (as the software industry) have been promised so many wildly different productivity boosts, one (read: I) would assume we'd have become somewhat immune. But no, after 4th generation languages, RUP, CASE tools, Lo/No Code, Blockchain, Microservice for everything, we still fall for such promises.
-
@b0rk To me, 'sad' is the right word. We (as the software industry) have been promised so many wildly different productivity boosts, one (read: I) would assume we'd have become somewhat immune. But no, after 4th generation languages, RUP, CASE tools, Lo/No Code, Blockchain, Microservice for everything, we still fall for such promises.
@b0rk Oh nooooo… Now I sound like a grumpy old person. Maybe—just maybe—because I turned into one. 🤪
-
@b0rk The origin of writing https://dustycloud.org/blog/a-letter-from-2016-to-2026/ is my bitterness that a decade ago, we heard a lot of promises that "don't worry, we'll automate away the boring stuff, you can focus on being creative!" and now people seem resigned to "well, all that creative stuff, I don't do it anymore"
Honestly, for me, not doing the creative stuff is giving up on the things that bring me the most happiness in life. And we know that what LLMs are bad at right now is anything that is genuinely new... they're very good at doing things that have been done before.
So, celebrate those who continue to be creative, I think. Because ultimately, even the vibecoders / vibeartists rely on their work to advance things.
But it's depressing to me to see the promises of what life would be like vs what it's now like.
On that note @b0rk, I'd include your work in the category of creative stuff worth celebrating. I hope you keep at it!
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk Anecdata from a freelance dev here: currently on a project for a ~$10 billion revenue company. Not a week goes by without a mail from some layer of management encouraging people to "use more AI". Entire teams are forced to come up with "user facing AI features", with no regard to what those teams are doing. There are mandatory AI sessions on the regular. New hires spend more time talking to copilot than to the rest of my team.
Things are changing very rapidly...
-
i do not want to get into the business of posting LLM takes but very briefly:
It feels clear to me that some people* are getting value out of using LLMs for programming. Basically see https://simonwillison.net/'s whole blog. If I think about it purely on the basis of "in a vacuum, can this help me write programs", it seems like an exciting technology.
BUT...
(1/?)
(* it also feels clear that some people are NOT getting value out of LLMs, hoping to avoid flamewars about that please)
@b0rk I think there is a jagged edge - on one side are tasks that benefit from LLMs (new standalone codebases, particularly in dynamic languages, creating written drafts, planning), and a group of people for whom they are useful (people working alone, the very senior who know exactly how to evaluate outputs), and on the other side are places they fall apart, and we (the industry as a whole) don’t spend nearly enough time examining the differences because of the hype
-
On that note @b0rk, I'd include your work in the category of creative stuff worth celebrating. I hope you keep at it!
@cwebber aw thank you! definitely when I think "what am I doing about AI" it's "idk keep writing stuff"
like i added some examples to the dig man page recently, and that is a small thing but not nothing
-
On that note @b0rk, I'd include your work in the category of creative stuff worth celebrating. I hope you keep at it!
-
@b0rk About searching getting increasingly worse, there's another side of this I've thought was interesting.
A non-negligible amount of people no longer ask their technical questions on public forums, they ask their favorite chatbot. These questions, and their answers, are not publicly displayed for other people sharing similar struggles to search for.
-
@b0rk About searching getting increasingly worse, there's another side of this I've thought was interesting.
A non-negligible amount of people no longer ask their technical questions on public forums, they ask their favorite chatbot. These questions, and their answers, are not publicly displayed for other people sharing similar struggles to search for.
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk see also the struggles LWN are having. Click through rates are down, their original material is lower down google search than LLM plagarised version of their own articles, plus they are getting effectively DDoS'd by scrapers.
It's outright warfare on actual human authored websites. -
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk I don't think that's entirely true. Although I'm very LLM skeptical, Google search enshitified before LLMs came about. They only sped a process that was already going on.
-
@b0rk About searching getting increasingly worse, there's another side of this I've thought was interesting.
A non-negligible amount of people no longer ask their technical questions on public forums, they ask their favorite chatbot. These questions, and their answers, are not publicly displayed for other people sharing similar struggles to search for.
-
@b0rk I think Google’s problems have more to do with its ad business than the slop at the top, which is a term I think I just coined for when the top of the search results is LLM output.
@nick @b0rk Agreed. I have NUMEROUS issues with LLMs*, but Google has been getting worse for years before chatGPT. It has focused on general information over specific, to the point where it ignores the actual terms you search for in favor of more popular ones, presumably because more popular results equates to more and revenue.
"Slop at the top" is a great phrase.
* Anti LLM rant implied rather than given out of respect for b0rk's request.
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk
As someone who recently graduated and been looking for a job, I've recently tried out Claude code and such because it seems there's an expectation now that I should get good at that.When I do, I find the experience to be impressive and almost overwhelming with what it can do & how quickly. But then I get a sinking feeling that... I just don't want to be doing this. If I knew in university this is what I'd be doing I'd have kept programming as a hobby and gone into something else.
-
i do not want to get into the business of posting LLM takes but very briefly:
It feels clear to me that some people* are getting value out of using LLMs for programming. Basically see https://simonwillison.net/'s whole blog. If I think about it purely on the basis of "in a vacuum, can this help me write programs", it seems like an exciting technology.
BUT...
(1/?)
(* it also feels clear that some people are NOT getting value out of LLMs, hoping to avoid flamewars about that please)
No flamewars, but this is really not about an individual "gets value / does not get value" decision. Except in the sense that a murderer gets value or does not get value out of murdering someone.
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk I also feel like the pricing model is a throwback to the mainframe era where you rented everything to do your job. I was too young for that but everyone I knew who had loved how they could buy a PC and, especially late in the 90s, use open source software to control the tools they depended on. Now participating in open source has a “train your replacement” feel and even the $200/mo models are currently subsidized so the economics are likely to shift even more.
-
i do not want to get into the business of posting LLM takes but very briefly:
It feels clear to me that some people* are getting value out of using LLMs for programming. Basically see https://simonwillison.net/'s whole blog. If I think about it purely on the basis of "in a vacuum, can this help me write programs", it seems like an exciting technology.
BUT...
(1/?)
(* it also feels clear that some people are NOT getting value out of LLMs, hoping to avoid flamewars about that please)
@b0rk I look at this way, these tools are profoundly changing our work, society.
I can sit on the sidelines and ignore it, or I can help shape the conversation in a small way.
I focus on helping find value: https://talk.macpowerusers.com/t/using-claude-as-strategic-thought-partner/44493 and the weaknesses https://agilepainrelief.com/blog/genai-code-quality-fundamental-flaws-and-how-bluffing-makes-it-worse/ and https://agilepainrelief.com/blog/is-ai-making-your-organization-fragile-or-more-resilient/
If I could turn back the clock on this technology, I would.
-
(continued from ^)
Google search doesn't work as well anymore because the results are full of LLM-generated articles? I hear about CEOs putting pressure on their teams to produce more faster because they've been told that AI will increase productivity?
it feels sad. even though I find LLMs useful sometimes, with all of the societal impacts it often feels like it isn't actually improving my life.
(2/?)
@b0rk It's a huge bummer. The technology IS cool and does present a huge advancement in our ability to interface with natural language.
I think it's important to frame it, instead of "can it do x?", as "sure, it can or might eventually be able to do X, but at what cost?" LLMs can and should exist and be accessible, and small open source models you can run on commodity hardware DO exist.
The problem is the eschatological venture capital death cult that's made LLMs their hobby horse,as always
-
