Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Want to read some anti disabled propaganda?

Want to read some anti disabled propaganda?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
4 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
    laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
    laukidh@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    RE: https://flipboard.com/@latimes/food-jn1ggo4tz/-/a-tjL4YhwbQUKCHeB9cAREEw%3Aa%3A460011909-%2F0

    Want to read some anti disabled propaganda? It’s bad to sue companies for ADA violations.

    epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • laukidh@infosec.exchangeL laukidh@infosec.exchange

      RE: https://flipboard.com/@latimes/food-jn1ggo4tz/-/a-tjL4YhwbQUKCHeB9cAREEw%3Aa%3A460011909-%2F0

      Want to read some anti disabled propaganda? It’s bad to sue companies for ADA violations.

      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
      epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
      epic_null@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @Laukidh Honestly, I see something else in this article. A broken system.

      The buisnesses are facing pentalties in part because they are not able to access a legal system (in which a judge could respond to the suit with "Technically yes, this is a violation, but the law's spirit was followed. Defendant, bring your stuff up to the letter of the law. Dismissed.")

      The number of complaints is limited to a few people because the knowledge and skill to actually complain is absurdly high.

      This is going to the courts because we are missing accessability auditing infrastructure that would provode a cheaper means of handling the situation for all parties - and a trained auditor would be able to reward good faith efforts with a "No penalties, here is a list of issues to address".

      The first response to an ADA violation should not be a lawsuit... but the other options are literally missing from our system.

      laukidh@infosec.exchangeL 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      • epic_null@infosec.exchangeE epic_null@infosec.exchange

        @Laukidh Honestly, I see something else in this article. A broken system.

        The buisnesses are facing pentalties in part because they are not able to access a legal system (in which a judge could respond to the suit with "Technically yes, this is a violation, but the law's spirit was followed. Defendant, bring your stuff up to the letter of the law. Dismissed.")

        The number of complaints is limited to a few people because the knowledge and skill to actually complain is absurdly high.

        This is going to the courts because we are missing accessability auditing infrastructure that would provode a cheaper means of handling the situation for all parties - and a trained auditor would be able to reward good faith efforts with a "No penalties, here is a list of issues to address".

        The first response to an ADA violation should not be a lawsuit... but the other options are literally missing from our system.

        laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
        laukidh@infosec.exchangeL This user is from outside of this forum
        laukidh@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @Epic_Null it’s absolutely f’d up.

        Yeah, this is the only recourse people have. Lawsuits and maybe getting lucky with someone publishing a story about it

        ADA went into effect in the 90s and it’s still on disabled people to complain instead of city permitting offices refusing businesses to open without meeting the standards, and more importantly landlords shouldn’t be able to rent out space that isn’t compliant.

        They should be paying for it, not the mom and pop stores.

        epic_null@infosec.exchangeE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • laukidh@infosec.exchangeL laukidh@infosec.exchange

          @Epic_Null it’s absolutely f’d up.

          Yeah, this is the only recourse people have. Lawsuits and maybe getting lucky with someone publishing a story about it

          ADA went into effect in the 90s and it’s still on disabled people to complain instead of city permitting offices refusing businesses to open without meeting the standards, and more importantly landlords shouldn’t be able to rent out space that isn’t compliant.

          They should be paying for it, not the mom and pop stores.

          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          epic_null@infosec.exchangeE This user is from outside of this forum
          epic_null@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Laukidh Even when it is on a mom and pop store, everyone involved deserves for an escalation level lower than a lawsuit to be made available. Which is why I brought up the auditor option.

          A health inspector is going to have more options than "fine a buisness", "close a buisness" or "do nothing". They can also answer questions and hold a dialog or offer resources if it's clear that the people running the buisness are actively trying to do things right, but have gotten something wrong.

          Where is the equivilant accessability inspector?

          We also have food grades of A, B and C - A being the best and most commom, but B being good enough for a buisness to keep running without much penalty as they work to address the issues.

          Where is our B grade option for the ADA? Because the likely cherrypicked story from the article absolutely described a B grade buisness. Scales too high? Reasonable complaint that needs fixing, but not a crisis. Reserved space next to parking lot large enough to be used but doesn't pass the measure test? I mean worth noting but not a huge deal. Customers in wheelchairs easily navigating technically too small isles? Again, minor issue.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups