Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running.

We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
426 Posts 315 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • faraiwe@mstdn.socialF faraiwe@mstdn.social

    @farbel @briankrebs is CPB a typo for CBP, or the actual address is CPB_PRA ? CPB dhs gov goes nowhere.

    farbel@mas.toF This user is from outside of this forum
    farbel@mas.toF This user is from outside of this forum
    farbel@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #43

    @faraiwe @briankrebs From the linked DHS document:

    Link Preview Image
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

      We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

      "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

      "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

      PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

      -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

      -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
      ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
      -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
      -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
      -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
      -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
      -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

      Just a moment...

      favicon

      (www.privacyinternational.org)

      The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
      must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

      Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

      ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
      ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
      ben@bluetoot.hardill.me.uk
      wrote last edited by
      #44

      @briankrebs So given you have to go through US immigration/customs even if just transiting through the US, this is also going to impact US Airlines, as who wants to turn over all that data even if just spending a few hours air side on the way to some where else?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • masek@infosec.exchangeM masek@infosec.exchange

        @briankrebs I would be unable to comply, even if I wanted to (and hell, I don't want to).

        I regularly use unique Email addresses and not all of them are documented. I guess that 5 years means 500+ email addresses.

        HaveIBennPwned quite often informs me, how wise that move is 🙂. Do they allow wildcards in email addresses?

        There are several more "no go" points in that text. And if a relative would hand out any information about me, I would consider that a breach of trust. So I won't do that either.

        I think any person wanting to visit the U.S. at the current state must be completely nuts.

        coatilex@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        coatilex@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
        coatilex@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #45

        @masek @briankrebs Who even knows all of the profiles, phone numbers, emails etc their relatives use? Like you, I wouldn't even be able to provide my own even if I wanted to.

        This seems like it's only meant to stifle free speech/ intimidate and to create probable cause if you want to go after someone. Because nobody will be able to fully comply

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

          @briankrebs

          I'm British, white, male, aged 60-ish.

          Prior to February 2016 I typically visited the USA 3 times a year for up to six weeks.

          Since February 2016 I have visited the USA twice in a decade, for a total of 10 days.

          Entering the USA as a foreigner, with a Republican POTUS in the White House, *never* felt safe, but under Trump it looks diabolically dangerous. (And to a glance I resemble "one of them": I'm not female or dark-skinned.)

          jzb@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jzb@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jzb@hachyderm.io
          wrote last edited by
          #46

          @cstross @briankrebs Living here is not a walk in the park at this point...

          I'd never ask anybody to travel here now. I'm glad I'm no longer in the events-organizing part of tech -- I couldn't host anything anywhere in the U.S. if it required people to come from outside.

          Not our largest problem right now, but it's a fairly nasty symptom.

          sjvn@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • shiitaketoast@beige.partyS shiitaketoast@beige.party

            @briankrebs I wish people understood how important the Federal Register is to how law is made. The government has to consider comments and if they fail to consider them seriously you can sue to block a regulation. The more people who comment with serious objections to a rule, the harder it is for the government to implement that rule. It’s an under appreciated avenue for direct democracy and direct action. If there’s an issue you care about, you can follow that on the FR

            infosecstuc@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            infosecstuc@infosec.exchangeI This user is from outside of this forum
            infosecstuc@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #47

            @ShiitakeToast new rule: "Anyone submitting an objection to the federal register must first provide 5 years social media, all email addr...."

            The only way to win is not to play.

            @briankrebs

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

              We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

              "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

              "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

              PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

              -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

              -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
              ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
              -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
              -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
              -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
              -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
              -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

              Just a moment...

              favicon

              (www.privacyinternational.org)

              The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
              must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

              Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

              thomastraynor@social.linux.pizzaT This user is from outside of this forum
              thomastraynor@social.linux.pizzaT This user is from outside of this forum
              thomastraynor@social.linux.pizza
              wrote last edited by
              #48

              @briankrebs Not visiting any time soon, but FUCK NO!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • waldi@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                waldi@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                waldi@chaos.social
                wrote last edited by
                #49

                @arrakeen_urbanite @briankrebs No, just to people with private jets or diplomatic passports.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • captmorgan@freeradical.zoneC captmorgan@freeradical.zone

                  @briankrebs Why would anyone want to travel to the US. Use a burner phone

                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mkj@social.mkj.earth
                  wrote last edited by
                  #50

                  @CaptMorgan How in the world would using a burner phone help with any of this?

                  @briankrebs

                  captmorgan@freeradical.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                    We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                    "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                    "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                    PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                    -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                    -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                    ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                    -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                    -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                    -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                    -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                    -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                    Just a moment...

                    favicon

                    (www.privacyinternational.org)

                    The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                    must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                    Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                    nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nini@oldbytes.space
                    wrote last edited by
                    #51

                    @briankrebs Data privacy aside, how would I know that this info wouldn't just find its way out onto the dark web for sale? I already gave up everything including my arsehole print to these fucks so that's one party who shouldn't have it already but that shouldn't mean I want it distributed more widely. Feels deeply unworkable for essentially having every bit of info that a fraudster could destroy my life with.

                    kongakong@masto.aiK 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      @briankrebs

                      I'm British, white, male, aged 60-ish.

                      Prior to February 2016 I typically visited the USA 3 times a year for up to six weeks.

                      Since February 2016 I have visited the USA twice in a decade, for a total of 10 days.

                      Entering the USA as a foreigner, with a Republican POTUS in the White House, *never* felt safe, but under Trump it looks diabolically dangerous. (And to a glance I resemble "one of them": I'm not female or dark-skinned.)

                      mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.euM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mavnn@bonfire.mavnn.eu
                      wrote last edited by
                      #52

                      @cstross@wandering.shop @briankrebs@infosec.exchange ​it doesn't just look dangerous, it looks actually impossible (legally) for many of us if that goes through. I don't have access to all of the information they're asking for even if I did want to give it to them (which I don't).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • runrichrun@mastodon.socialR runrichrun@mastodon.social

                        @briankrebs
                        Seems like a good time — unfortunately — for those outside the US to #boycott major sporting events like the #WorldCup, #LAOlympics, etc. There is no way to guarantee the safety of travelers from abroad — just as there is no way to guarantee the safety of US citizens — until these fascists, goons, grifters and thugs are out of office. Sad.

                        geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                        geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
                        geonz@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote last edited by
                        #53

                        @RunRichRun @briankrebs Pro sports are such a racket, anyway.... Imagine if 1 tenth of those dollars went to charity or ... mutual aid in ICE targets....

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jzb@hachyderm.ioJ jzb@hachyderm.io

                          @cstross @briankrebs Living here is not a walk in the park at this point...

                          I'd never ask anybody to travel here now. I'm glad I'm no longer in the events-organizing part of tech -- I couldn't host anything anywhere in the U.S. if it required people to come from outside.

                          Not our largest problem right now, but it's a fairly nasty symptom.

                          sjvn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sjvn@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          sjvn@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #54

                          @jzb @cstross @briankrebs Agreed. No one should visit the States now. It's not safe here.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                            We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                            "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                            "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                            PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                            -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                            -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                            ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                            -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                            -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                            -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                            -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                            -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                            Just a moment...

                            favicon

                            (www.privacyinternational.org)

                            The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                            must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                            Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                            peacefulz@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                            peacefulz@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                            peacefulz@infosec.exchange
                            wrote last edited by
                            #55

                            @briankrebs lmao if they wanted those types of data points on me, they'd have a lot to fish through! I've been using dummy phone numbers, emails, and identities for services for over a decade. I'm talking hundreds of numbers. Thousands of emails. Do they count bots as my social media? Literally gigs of plaintext to sort through. Not to mention I post encrypted blobs in places too.

                            This is just going to impact our economy negatively. Zero forethought.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                              We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                              "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                              "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                              PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                              -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                              -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                              ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                              -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                              -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                              -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                              -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                              -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                              Just a moment...

                              favicon

                              (www.privacyinternational.org)

                              The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                              must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                              Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                              mariyadelano@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mariyadelano@hachyderm.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mariyadelano@hachyderm.io
                              wrote last edited by
                              #56

                              @briankrebs and coupled with immigration law having provisions that classify any kind of omission on an immigration, visa, or entry form as potential immigration fraud and grounds to disqualify the individual from ANY future status = anybody that forgets one email address or social media account they’ve had years ago is suddenly easily turned into an “illegal immigrant” and passed into the jurisdiction of ICE for deportation and potentially a permanent life ban from the US.

                              implementcontrols@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                                We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                                "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                                "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                                PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                                -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                                -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                                ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                                -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                                -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                                -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                                -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                                -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                                Just a moment...

                                favicon

                                (www.privacyinternational.org)

                                The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                                must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                                Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                                ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ggmcbg@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ggmcbg@mstdn.plus
                                wrote last edited by
                                #57

                                @briankrebs

                                Ha. Fuck America. lol

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ojensen@hachyderm.ioO ojensen@hachyderm.io

                                  @briankrebs

                                  as someone who has been using unique email addresses for every service, I look forward to submitting several hundred addresses.

                                  samy@eupolicy.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  samy@eupolicy.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  samy@eupolicy.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #58

                                  @ojensen @briankrebs
                                  That’s what I thought!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • derickr@phpc.socialD derickr@phpc.social

                                    @ojensen @briankrebs Do you even remember them all? I certainly don't.

                                    ojensen@hachyderm.ioO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ojensen@hachyderm.ioO This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ojensen@hachyderm.io
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #59

                                    @derickr @briankrebs most of them, since they're in a big list in my email provider. Doubtless there's a few that I've deleted, though, so to be safe I'll need to add a bunch of maybes to the list.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                                      We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                                      "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                                      "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                                      PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                                      -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                                      -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                                      ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                                      -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                                      -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                                      -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                                      -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                                      -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                                      Just a moment...

                                      favicon

                                      (www.privacyinternational.org)

                                      The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                                      must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                                      Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                                      realgene@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      realgene@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      realgene@hachyderm.io
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #60

                                      @briankrebs
                                      Why didn't they just require everyone get chipped also?

                                      frieke72@mastodon.socialF implementcontrols@mastodon.socialI 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mkj@social.mkj.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mkj@social.mkj.earth
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #61

                                        @tdr @independentpen Besides, tit-for-tat international relations rarely works.

                                        If the EU should do anything in response to something like this, make it a reminder that sharing that information without the explicit and informed consent of the data subject is strictly prohibited under the GDPR. And that that includes a third country resident sharing such data as relates to EU data subjects.

                                        @arrakeen_urbanite @briankrebs

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • briankrebs@infosec.exchangeB briankrebs@infosec.exchange

                                          We knew this was coming, but now the clock is running. From Privacy International:

                                          "Yesterday the Trump Administration announced a proposed change in policy for travellers to the U.S. It applies to the powers of data collection by the Customs and Border Police (CBP)."

                                          "If the proposed changes are adopted after the 60-day consultation, then millions of travellers to the U.S. will be forced to use a U.S. government mobile phone app, submit their social media from the last five years and email addresses used in the last ten years, including of family members. They’re also proposing the collection of DNA."

                                          PI linked to and summarized a Federal Register entry describing the proposed requirements:

                                          -All visitors must submit ‘their social media from the last 5 years’

                                          -ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) applications will include ‘high value data fields’, ‘when feasible’
                                          ‘telephone numbers used in the last five years’
                                          -‘email addresses used in the last ten years’
                                          -‘family number telephone numbers (sic) used in the last five years’
                                          -biometrics – face, fingerprint, DNA, and iris
                                          -business telephone numbers used in the last five years
                                          -business email addresses used in the last ten years.

                                          Just a moment...

                                          favicon

                                          (www.privacyinternational.org)

                                          The Federal Register entry says comments are encouraged and
                                          must be submitted (no later than February 9, 2026) to be assured of consideration.

                                          Federal Register entry: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2025-12-10/pdf/2025-22461.pdf

                                          vekkq@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          vekkq@social.vivaldi.netV This user is from outside of this forum
                                          vekkq@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #62

                                          @briankrebs the 2028 Olympics in LA will be fun. No visitors and no athletes from outside.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups