Don't make me regret this ...
-
@suearcher This is part of the problem ... these people need to be better know, but even we need to look them up.
I'm guessing that many young people would be hard pressed to name any mathematicians (as opposed to scientists) so it's probably good if you can introduce them to a good proportion of male and female ones!
-
Marie Curie
Rosalind Franklin
Ada Lovelace
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin
Jocelyn Bell Burnell3/n
@ColinTheMathmo
Hypatia
Emilie du Chatelet
Maria Lombardini Sirmen
Lady Julian of Norwich
Hildegard of Bingen -
@antoinechambertloir For the purposes of engaging younger students, a list of random people of whom they've never heard is possibly not the best thing to do. Yes, these are (potentially) important people to be remembered, but creating engagement in students is perhaps not going to be helped by such a list.
This is hard. This is very hard, bordering on impossible. But I'm trying to connect things students have heard of with each other, and with new things they can learn about.
Newton, the Great Plague, and the Great Fire of London is a well-known and well-established connection.
Question: What was happening in Europe when Gauss was around? What music? What politicians? Who might he have met?
For example, Gauss and Beethoven were contemporaries.
That sort of thing.
CC: @e7_87
@ColinTheMathmo @antoinechambertloir @e7_87 as somebody else mentioned here and elsewhere, Sophie Germain would be a perfect example for what you are trying to do if you connect her to Gauss, and bring up questions about why she pretends to be a man (even if you question whether or not Gauss would have listened to her had he known she was a woman).
I also think there is value in doing cross generational discussions (as I mentioned Pingala made discoveries that were replicated 1400 and 1800 years later by Fibonacci and Pascal) why is there attribution to Fibonacci and Pascal, and like Antoine has pointed out there are sociological reasons for this.
There are parallels between the lives of Hypatia, Maria Gaetana Agnesi and Ada Lovelace, but then there are also extreme dissimilarities between their lives.
You can mention Queen Dido and her solution to the isoperimetroc problem in the foundation of the city of Carthage. This connects to Virgil’s Aeneid.
You can also compare the lives of Sofya Kolavskeya and Maria Chudnovsky where there are parallels (born in Russia/Soviet Union, both left the country to pursue a higher degree, both made groundbreaking advances to a problem that had been open for many years) yet they were born a little over one hundred years and the conditions for the recognition of mathematic talent amongst women had changed (their lives have been completely different in many other aspects).
Somebody mentioned Ada Lovelace, her story has many connections to the beginnings of computer science, she was the daughter of Lord Byron, who was instrumental in the stories surrounding the creations of horror icons such as Dracula and Frankenstein’s monster.
-
@ColinTheMathmo I was reacting to some sentence, earlier in the thread, by somebody else, that I read as “no woman has done notable things” and my — angry — answer was, “maybe learn what these women have done before saying such a thing.”
@antoinechambertloir I must have missed ... who said "no woman has done notable things" ??
Certainly I never said that ... where did you see it?
I'm confused as to exactly what you are responding to. I, for one, know a lot of notable things done by amazing women.
What is certainly true is that you have to dig quite hard to find them. They are there, but they are not as visible or celebrated.
That's not the same as saying "no woman has done notable things."
-
@antoinechambertloir I must have missed ... who said "no woman has done notable things" ??
Certainly I never said that ... where did you see it?
I'm confused as to exactly what you are responding to. I, for one, know a lot of notable things done by amazing women.
What is certainly true is that you have to dig quite hard to find them. They are there, but they are not as visible or celebrated.
That's not the same as saying "no woman has done notable things."
@ColinTheMathmo you didn't say that, but the message you were answering.
(Add) after reading the beginning of tbe thread, I feel sorry to have stepped up into your conversation like this. -
I don't think I've seen anyone else mention him, but in terms of situating developments in maths alongside more well-known historical events, then... Shakespeare. Born in between publication of Robert Recorde's two important books that helped to embed an entirely new number system into British life, industry, and commerce. He and his own father would have learnt not just different algorithms for calculating in their respective school careers, but entirely different number _systems_, and there's evidence of Bill playing with this new-fangled system throughout his famous works.
@TeaKayB Shakespeare is on my original list, up-thread from here.
I've seen Rob Eastaway's talk about this.
There's also Sarah Hart's books about the connections between maths and literature.
-
@ColinTheMathmo dates for when various countries were founded. A lot of them are surprisingly recent.
@Scmbradley @ColinTheMathmo to make this less eurocentric, I'd suggest also the dates of various countries being on one end subjugated and the other liberated from colonization. Both often also surprisingly recent.
-
@TeaKayB Shakespeare is on my original list, up-thread from here.
I've seen Rob Eastaway's talk about this.
There's also Sarah Hart's books about the connections between maths and literature.
@ColinTheMathmo
Oops, missed him on there: couldn't see Birnam wood for the moving trees!Yes - plenty of literary links in Sarah Hart's stuff!
-
@Scmbradley @ColinTheMathmo to make this less eurocentric, I'd suggest also the dates of various countries being on one end subjugated and the other liberated from colonization. Both often also surprisingly recent.
@pettter The danger is that any project like this turns into an overwhelmingly crowded attempt to list everything, and that would then get entirely ignored by everyone except those who take exception to things they think are missing.
I want to connect things young people have heard of, to things they may then find interesting or useful.
Have they heard of Mozart? Bach? Beethoven? Vivaldi? Tchaikovsky?
Have they heard of Michelangelo? Leonardo?
What maths was being done around then?
CC: @Scmbradley
-
@ColinTheMathmo Processing ...
-
@pettter The danger is that any project like this turns into an overwhelmingly crowded attempt to list everything, and that would then get entirely ignored by everyone except those who take exception to things they think are missing.
I want to connect things young people have heard of, to things they may then find interesting or useful.
Have they heard of Mozart? Bach? Beethoven? Vivaldi? Tchaikovsky?
Have they heard of Michelangelo? Leonardo?
What maths was being done around then?
CC: @Scmbradley
@pettter @ColinTheMathmo @Scmbradley let’s not then start by assuming we know what is interesting or what they know- ask them. While we might think it’s relevant why will they? This might be a topic that is interesting to young adults rather than youth, they need to be aware of what they don’t know?
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
