Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. it's kinda hilarious watching bluesky users talking about how they have to stay on the site, even as it gets worse, because they can't go back to twitter!

it's kinda hilarious watching bluesky users talking about how they have to stay on the site, even as it gets worse, because they can't go back to twitter!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
78 Posts 55 Posters 148 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • aran@localization.cafeA aran@localization.cafe

    @foone I came to the conclusion that some people are simply ideologically opposed to the Fediverse. That billionaire-owned platforms aren't a necessary evil, but their preferred choice. I guess they feel pinko otherwise? 😄

    nora@blob.loveN This user is from outside of this forum
    nora@blob.loveN This user is from outside of this forum
    nora@blob.love
    wrote last edited by
    #27

    @aran @foone i think some people find it uncomfortable that there isn't a formal hierarchy of power either because they have had bad experiences with what grows in its absence or because they don't have a guide on how to behave

    oblomov@sociale.networkO 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

      I don't know why they have this huge blindspot for mastodon, but it is hilarious to see that every time they talk about the viable microblogging platforms, they will list every possibility except fediverse ones

      somekindofgarf@kind.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      somekindofgarf@kind.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      somekindofgarf@kind.social
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      @foone Worst is I've seen people start here, go "this isn't right" for reasons not disclosed, move to blue sky and complain about it disclosing *exactly* the reasons it sucks.

      nicolai@babka.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

        I don't know why they have this huge blindspot for mastodon, but it is hilarious to see that every time they talk about the viable microblogging platforms, they will list every possibility except fediverse ones

        foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
        foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
        foone@digipres.club
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        and to clarify: I'm not saying mastodon is 100% perfect or for everyone.

        Maybe some of them have tried mastodon and don't like it for whatever reason, sure!

        but my point is that they don't even mention it as a possibility.

        foone@digipres.clubF deshipu@fosstodon.orgD mdhughes@appdot.netM liw@toot.liw.fiL devourer_ita@meow.socialD 6 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
        • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

          and to clarify: I'm not saying mastodon is 100% perfect or for everyone.

          Maybe some of them have tried mastodon and don't like it for whatever reason, sure!

          but my point is that they don't even mention it as a possibility.

          foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
          foone@digipres.clubF This user is from outside of this forum
          foone@digipres.club
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          it's not that they don't think mastodon is bad for whatever reason, it's that they don't think about mastodon at all

          nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN f4grx@chaos.socialF pixelrobot@neopaquita.esP sen@gnulinux.socialS poilapan@mastodon.gamedev.placeP 11 Replies Last reply
          0
          • eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

            @foone mostly when I try to promote fedi there people yell at me so I stopped 😞

            One time I even had someone have a go at me because fedi is apparently anti queer? That was pretty bizarre

            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
            oblomov@sociale.network
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            @eniko @foone I wonder if instead of actively promoting the Fediverse, simply commenting in these threads with something «I'm not worried about the BlueSky collapse, it won't affect my Mastodon use», like, making it personal instead of a recommendation for others, would be more effective.

            oblomov@sociale.networkO 0x0961h@mastodon.gamedev.place0 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

              it's not that they don't think mastodon is bad for whatever reason, it's that they don't think about mastodon at all

              nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
              nosirrahsec@infosec.exchangeN This user is from outside of this forum
              nosirrahsec@infosec.exchange
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              @foone I increasingly feel as I age that having technological and scientific knowledge is more burden than boon.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                and to clarify: I'm not saying mastodon is 100% perfect or for everyone.

                Maybe some of them have tried mastodon and don't like it for whatever reason, sure!

                but my point is that they don't even mention it as a possibility.

                deshipu@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                deshipu@fosstodon.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                deshipu@fosstodon.org
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                @foone I think they just don't see it as a viable platform because it costs money, and doesn't make it, and with our capitalist training that's just something that shouldn't exist. If it at least was spending VC money, and promising future income. But no, we are literally running "at a loss" (if you only care for money).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • aran@localization.cafeA aran@localization.cafe

                  @foone I came to the conclusion that some people are simply ideologically opposed to the Fediverse. That billionaire-owned platforms aren't a necessary evil, but their preferred choice. I guess they feel pinko otherwise? 😄

                  xenophora@mastodon.artX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xenophora@mastodon.artX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xenophora@mastodon.art
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  @aran @foone

                  They honestly feel like if some billionaire isn’t breathing down their neck all the time, they aren’t high class anymore. lol

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • oblomov@sociale.networkO oblomov@sociale.network

                    @eniko @foone I wonder if instead of actively promoting the Fediverse, simply commenting in these threads with something «I'm not worried about the BlueSky collapse, it won't affect my Mastodon use», like, making it personal instead of a recommendation for others, would be more effective.

                    oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                    oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                    oblomov@sociale.network
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    @eniko @foone

                    It should at least decrease the complaints. «Yeah, I'm not suggesting you come over, it's just where I'm at.»

                    The antiqueer thing is weird, but in these cases I always try to remember that each of us has a very different Fedi experience, and there ARE queer-unfriendly accounts, especially on the larger instances —plus of course the usual Nazi-adjacent instances who are more than happy to roam around and harrass people “just for the fun of it”.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • eniko@mastodon.gamedev.placeE eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place

                      @foone mostly when I try to promote fedi there people yell at me so I stopped 😞

                      One time I even had someone have a go at me because fedi is apparently anti queer? That was pretty bizarre

                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      @eniko @foone it's always interesting peeking inside these island realities and finding out what people there actually believe that ensures they stay separated from larger realities

                      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                        @eniko @foone it's always interesting peeking inside these island realities and finding out what people there actually believe that ensures they stay separated from larger realities

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        @eniko @foone (we're not referring to number of users, but a more metaphorical notion of size)

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                          and to clarify: I'm not saying mastodon is 100% perfect or for everyone.

                          Maybe some of them have tried mastodon and don't like it for whatever reason, sure!

                          but my point is that they don't even mention it as a possibility.

                          mdhughes@appdot.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mdhughes@appdot.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mdhughes@appdot.net
                          wrote last edited by
                          #38

                          @foone We're kind of like mythical goblins or elfs, if you name us, we'll come & take your children away to program gay flags on 8-bit computers.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                            it's not that they don't think mastodon is bad for whatever reason, it's that they don't think about mastodon at all

                            f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                            f4grx@chaos.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #39

                            @foone this is so good to be transparent.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                              it's not that they don't think mastodon is bad for whatever reason, it's that they don't think about mastodon at all

                              pixelrobot@neopaquita.esP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pixelrobot@neopaquita.esP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pixelrobot@neopaquita.es
                              wrote last edited by
                              #40

                              @foone I think people, especially in the USA, want a corporate for profit structure running things and a manager they can yell at. They don't trust a community project run by volunteers without a corporation behind it. They automatically don't take it seriously. They think that's a nice hobby for nerds, but not something they can really use.

                              pare@kamu.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • oblomov@sociale.networkO oblomov@sociale.network

                                @eniko @foone I wonder if instead of actively promoting the Fediverse, simply commenting in these threads with something «I'm not worried about the BlueSky collapse, it won't affect my Mastodon use», like, making it personal instead of a recommendation for others, would be more effective.

                                0x0961h@mastodon.gamedev.place0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                0x0961h@mastodon.gamedev.place0 This user is from outside of this forum
                                0x0961h@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                wrote last edited by
                                #41

                                @oblomov @eniko @foone sadly these days the choice of social network for many is almost religious kind of question, so they will see it as heresy when you say something works better and attack you anyway

                                it's also not hip (it doesn't look like twitter 100%) and hard to use (choosing instance requires user to have ability to think and ex-x users prefer to delegate it to billionaires who know what's best for them)

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                  it's not that they don't think mastodon is bad for whatever reason, it's that they don't think about mastodon at all

                                  sen@gnulinux.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sen@gnulinux.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  sen@gnulinux.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #42

                                  @foone mastodon is not something you can buy at the store, so I think it evades most peoples radar.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                    it's not that they don't think mastodon is bad for whatever reason, it's that they don't think about mastodon at all

                                    poilapan@mastodon.gamedev.placeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    poilapan@mastodon.gamedev.placeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    poilapan@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #43

                                    @foone I think people in general are still operating on a centralized network model and would like to use something that is more streamlined and normie-friendly. People ought to learn old-school web tech and undo years of social media conditioning.

                                    nicolai@babka.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                      I don't know why they have this huge blindspot for mastodon, but it is hilarious to see that every time they talk about the viable microblogging platforms, they will list every possibility except fediverse ones

                                      nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      nicolai@babka.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #44

                                      @foone because mastodon has some very clear technical limitations (especially the every server blocks how it wants instead of I subscribe to the block lists of my choice) and issues (unified visibility!) that make it not that great for a certain type of use

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • somekindofgarf@kind.socialS somekindofgarf@kind.social

                                        @foone Worst is I've seen people start here, go "this isn't right" for reasons not disclosed, move to blue sky and complain about it disclosing *exactly* the reasons it sucks.

                                        nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nicolai@babka.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nicolai@babka.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #45

                                        @somekindofgarf @foone the problem is if you start talking about what isn’t right here, people take offense, pretend that bugs are features to them and it becomes very exhausting and socially unpleasant

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • foone@digipres.clubF foone@digipres.club

                                          it's kinda hilarious watching bluesky users talking about how they have to stay on the site, even as it gets worse, because they can't go back to twitter!

                                          which is the only other option available

                                          jdgeoshack@social.vivaldi.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jdgeoshack@social.vivaldi.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jdgeoshack@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #46

                                          @foone Go full fediverse #bluesky

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups